
GeForce GTX TITAN X

Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design
GeForce GTX TITAN X vs Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce GTX TITAN X vs Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce GTX TITAN X vs Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce GTX TITAN X
2015Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 12.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($999 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 12 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation (2025).
- ❌2015 hardware with 12 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
- ❌212.5% higher power demand at 250W vs 80W.
Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design
2019Why buy it
- ✅16.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation (2025).
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 12 GB).
- ✅Better long-term bet: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 80W instead of 250W, a 170W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 12.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX TITAN X vs Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX TITAN X
The GeForce GTX TITAN X is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 17 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1075 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,621 points. Launch price was $999.

Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design
The Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 600 MHz to 1350 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 80W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 48 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,675 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX TITAN X scores 12,621 and the Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design reaches 12,675 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX TITAN X is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design uses Turing, both on 28 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 3,072 (GeForce GTX TITAN X) vs 3,072 (Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design). Raw compute: 6.691 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX TITAN X) vs 8.294 TFLOPS (Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design). Boost clocks: 1075 MHz vs 1350 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN X | Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 12,621 | 12,675 |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Turing |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 3072 | 3072 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.691 TFLOPS | 8.294 TFLOPS+24% |
| Boost Clock | 1075 MHz | 1350 MHz+26% |
| ROPs | 96+50% | 64 |
| TMUs | 192 | 192 |
| L1 Cache | 1.1 MB | 3 MB+173% |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 4 MB+33% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The clearest feature edge for the Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design is support for DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The GeForce GTX TITAN X does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design supports the newer DLSS 4 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce GTX TITAN X is capped at Upscaling support.
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN X | Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | DLSS 4 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 4) |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX TITAN X has 12 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design carries 16 GB. Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design gives you 33.3% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 384-bit on the GeForce GTX TITAN X and 256-bit on the Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design. L2 Cache: 3 MB (GeForce GTX TITAN X) vs 4 MB (Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design) — the Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN X | Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB | 16 GB+33% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 384-bit+50% | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 4 MB+33% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (FL 12_1) (GeForce GTX TITAN X) vs 12.2 (Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN X | Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (FL 12_1) | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6+2% |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 2nd gen (GeForce GTX TITAN X) vs 7th Gen NVENC (Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design). Decoder: NVDEC 2nd gen vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce GTX TITAN X) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design).
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN X | Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 2nd gen | 7th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | NVDEC 2nd gen | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX TITAN X draws 250W versus the Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design's 80W — a 103% difference. The Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (GeForce GTX TITAN X) vs 500W (Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design). Power connectors: 6-pin + 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 83°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN X | Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W | 80W-68% |
| Recommended PSU | 600W | 500W-17% |
| Power Connector | 6-pin + 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | 0mm |
| Height | 111mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 83°C | 80°C-4% |
| Perf/Watt | 50.5 | 158.4+214% |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design (2019 vs 2015).
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN X | Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $999 | — |
| Codename | GM200 | TU104 |
| Release | March 17 2015 | May 27 2019 |
| Ranking | #209 | #208 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















