GeForce GTX TITAN X
VS
Radeon Pro Vega 64

GeForce GTX TITAN X vs Radeon Pro Vega 64

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX TITAN X

2015Core: 1000 MHzBoost: 1075 MHz
VS
AMD

Radeon Pro Vega 64

2017Core: 1250 MHzBoost: 1350 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon Pro Vega 64

#18
Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $340
142%
#19
RTX A2000 12GB
MSRP: $449|Avg: $380
142%
#20
Radeon Pro Vega 56
MSRP: $399|Avg: $60
141%
#21
RTX A2000
MSRP: $450|Avg: $320
139%
#23
Intel Arc Pro B60
MSRP: $500|Avg: $450
128%
#24
Radeon PRO W7600
MSRP: $599|Avg: $599
128%
#25
RTX 2000 Ada Generation
MSRP: $625|Avg: $750
128%
#26
Radeon Pro Vega 48
MSRP: $450|Avg: $450
116%
#27
Radeon Pro 5700 XT
MSRP: $500|Avg: $280
116%
#28
Quadro P5200
MSRP: $500|Avg: $240
108%
#29
Radeon PRO W7700
MSRP: $999|Avg: $999
107%
#30
Radeon PRO W6600
MSRP: $649|Avg: $649
107%
#32
Radeon AI PRO R9700
MSRP: $1299|Avg: $1450
102%
#33
Radeon Pro Vega 64
MSRP: $599|Avg: $114
100%
#38
Radeon PRO W6600X
MSRP: $699|Avg: $699
87%
#41
Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel)
MSRP: $600|Avg: $600
84%
#42
Radeon Pro W5700
MSRP: $799|Avg: $300
84%
#43
Radeon Pro W5700X
MSRP: $999|Avg: $999
82%
#44
RTX A4000
MSRP: $1111|Avg: $1111
81%
#45
RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell
MSRP: $849|Avg: $748
79%
#46
Quadro RTX 4000
MSRP: $899|Avg: $220
77%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon Pro Vega 64 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.1% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce GTX TITAN X offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

InsightGeForce GTX TITAN XRadeon Pro Vega 64
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-2.1%)
Leading raw performance (+2.1%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / GCN 5.0 (2017−2020))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
✅ More VRAM (+100+%)
❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency
Normal Efficiency
Normal Efficiency
Case Fit
Standard Size (267mm)
Standard Size (267mm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Radeon Pro Vega 64 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon Pro Vega 64 holds the technical lead. Priced at $114 (vs $120), it costs 5% less, resulting in a 7.5% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightGeForce GTX TITAN XRadeon Pro Vega 64
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+7.5%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($120)
More affordable ($114)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX TITAN X and Radeon Pro Vega 64

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX TITAN X

The GeForce GTX TITAN X is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 17 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1075 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,621 points. Launch price was $999.

AMD

Radeon Pro Vega 64

The Radeon Pro Vega 64 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 27 2017. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1250 MHz to 1350 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,891 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX TITAN X scores 12,621 and the Radeon Pro Vega 64 reaches 12,891 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX TITAN X is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Radeon Pro Vega 64 uses GCN 5.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 3,072 (GeForce GTX TITAN X) vs 4,096 (Radeon Pro Vega 64). Raw compute: 6.691 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX TITAN X) vs 11.06 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro Vega 64). Boost clocks: 1075 MHz vs 1350 MHz.

FeatureGeForce GTX TITAN XRadeon Pro Vega 64
G3D Mark Score
12,621
12,891+2%
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
GCN 5.0
Process Node
28 nm
14 nm
Shading Units
3072
4096+33%
Compute (TFLOPS)
6.691 TFLOPS
11.06 TFLOPS+65%
Boost Clock
1075 MHz
1350 MHz+26%
ROPs
96+50%
64
TMUs
192
256+33%
L1 Cache
1.1 MB+10%
1 MB
L2 Cache
3 MB
4 MB+33%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce GTX TITAN XRadeon Pro Vega 64
Upscaling Tech
FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
FSR 3 (Compatible)
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX TITAN X comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro Vega 64 has 0 MB. The GeForce GTX TITAN X offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 384-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 3 MB (GeForce GTX TITAN X) vs 4 MB (Radeon Pro Vega 64) — the Radeon Pro Vega 64 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce GTX TITAN XRadeon Pro Vega 64
VRAM Capacity
12 GB
Shared System RAM
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR6
Bus Width
384-bit+200%
128-bit
L2 Cache
3 MB
4 MB+33%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (FL 12_1) (GeForce GTX TITAN X) vs 12.1 (Radeon Pro Vega 64). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

FeatureGeForce GTX TITAN XRadeon Pro Vega 64
DirectX
12 (FL 12_1)
12.1
Vulkan
1.3+18%
1.1
OpenGL
4.5
4.6+2%
Max Displays
4
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 2nd gen (GeForce GTX TITAN X) vs VCE 4.0 (Radeon Pro Vega 64). Decoder: NVDEC 2nd gen vs UVD 7.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce GTX TITAN X) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro Vega 64).

FeatureGeForce GTX TITAN XRadeon Pro Vega 64
Encoder
NVENC 2nd gen
VCE 4.0
Decoder
NVDEC 2nd gen
UVD 7.0
Codecs
H.264,H.265/HEVC
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX TITAN X draws 250W versus the Radeon Pro Vega 64's 250W — a 0% difference. The Radeon Pro Vega 64 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (GeForce GTX TITAN X) vs 1W (Radeon Pro Vega 64). Power connectors: 6-pin + 8-pin vs Integrated. Card length: 267mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 83°C vs 85°C.

FeatureGeForce GTX TITAN XRadeon Pro Vega 64
TDP
250W
250W
Recommended PSU
600W
1W-100%
Power Connector
6-pin + 8-pin
Integrated
Length
267mm
267mm
Height
111mm
111mm
Slots
2
2
Temp (Load)
83°C-2%
85°C
Perf/Watt
50.5
51.6+2%
💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GTX TITAN X launched at $999 MSRP and currently averages $120, while the Radeon Pro Vega 64 launched at $599 and now averages $114. The Radeon Pro Vega 64 costs 5% less ($6 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 105.2 (GeForce GTX TITAN X) vs 113.1 (Radeon Pro Vega 64) — the Radeon Pro Vega 64 offers 7.5% better value. The Radeon Pro Vega 64 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2015).

FeatureGeForce GTX TITAN XRadeon Pro Vega 64
MSRP
$999
$599-40%
Avg Price (30d)
$120
$114-5%
Performance per Dollar
105.2
113.1+8%
Codename
GM200
Vega 10
Release
March 17 2015
June 27 2017
Ranking
#209
#202