GeForce GTX TITAN X
Radeon Pro Vega 64
GeForce GTX TITAN X vs Radeon Pro Vega 64 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce GTX TITAN X vs Radeon Pro Vega 64 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce GTX TITAN X vs Radeon Pro Vega 64: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce GTX TITAN X
2015Why buy it
- ✅13.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs Unknown).
- ✅Radeon Pro Vega 64 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GeForce GTX TITAN X is the less risky modern option long term.
Trade-offs
- ❌2015 hardware with 12 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
- ❌66.8% HIGHER MSRP$999 MSRPvs$599 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 12.6 vs 21.5 G3D/$ ($999 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
Radeon Pro Vega 64
2017Why buy it
- ✅Costs $400 less on MSRP ($599 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 70.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 21.5 vs 12.6 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
- ✅More future proof: GCN 5.0 (2017−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX TITAN X across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2017 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX TITAN X vs Radeon Pro Vega 64 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
GeForce GTX TITAN X
The GeForce GTX TITAN X is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 17 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1075 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,621 points. Launch price was $999.
Radeon Pro Vega 64
The Radeon Pro Vega 64 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 27 2017. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1250 MHz to 1350 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,891 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX TITAN X scores 12,621 and the Radeon Pro Vega 64 reaches 12,891 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX TITAN X is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Radeon Pro Vega 64 uses GCN 5.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 3,072 (GeForce GTX TITAN X) vs 4,096 (Radeon Pro Vega 64). Raw compute: 6.691 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX TITAN X) vs 11.06 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro Vega 64). Boost clocks: 1075 MHz vs 1350 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN X | Radeon Pro Vega 64 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 12,621 | 12,891+2% |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | GCN 5.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 3072 | 4096+33% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.691 TFLOPS | 11.06 TFLOPS+65% |
| Boost Clock | 1075 MHz | 1350 MHz+26% |
| ROPs | 96+50% | 64 |
| TMUs | 192 | 256+33% |
| L1 Cache | 1.1 MB+10% | 1 MB |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 4 MB+33% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX TITAN X gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon Pro Vega 64 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN X | Radeon Pro Vega 64 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX TITAN X has 12 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro Vega 64 carries 0 MB. GeForce GTX TITAN X gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 384-bit on the GeForce GTX TITAN X and 128-bit on the Radeon Pro Vega 64. L2 Cache: 3 MB (GeForce GTX TITAN X) vs 4 MB (Radeon Pro Vega 64) — the Radeon Pro Vega 64 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN X | Radeon Pro Vega 64 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 384-bit+200% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 4 MB+33% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (FL 12_1) (GeForce GTX TITAN X) vs 12.1 (Radeon Pro Vega 64). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN X | Radeon Pro Vega 64 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (FL 12_1) | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+18% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6+2% |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 2nd gen (GeForce GTX TITAN X) vs VCE 4.0 (Radeon Pro Vega 64). Decoder: NVDEC 2nd gen vs UVD 7.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce GTX TITAN X) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro Vega 64).
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN X | Radeon Pro Vega 64 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 2nd gen | VCE 4.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC 2nd gen | UVD 7.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX TITAN X draws 250W versus the Radeon Pro Vega 64's 250W — a 0% difference. The Radeon Pro Vega 64 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (GeForce GTX TITAN X) vs 1W (Radeon Pro Vega 64). Power connectors: 6-pin + 8-pin vs Integrated. Card length: 267mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 83°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN X | Radeon Pro Vega 64 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 600W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | 6-pin + 8-pin | Integrated |
| Length | 267mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 83°C-2% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 50.5 | 51.6+2% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce GTX TITAN X came in at $999, while the Radeon Pro Vega 64 launched at $599. On MSRP, Radeon Pro Vega 64 was 40% cheaper ($400 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 12.6 (GeForce GTX TITAN X) vs 21.5 (Radeon Pro Vega 64) — the Radeon Pro Vega 64 offers 70.6% better value. The newer card here is Radeon Pro Vega 64 (2017 vs 2015).
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN X | Radeon Pro Vega 64 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $999 | $599-40% |
| Performance per Dollar | 12.6 | 21.5+71% |
| Codename | GM200 | Vega 10 |
| Release | March 17 2015 | June 27 2017 |
| Ranking | #209 | #202 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce GTX TITAN X and Radeon Pro Vega 64
