G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs GeForce GTX TITAN X FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs GeForce GTX TITAN X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

2019

Why buy it

✅Costs $720 less on MSRP ($279 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
✅Delivers 261.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 45.7 vs 12.6 G3D/$ ($279 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
✅Better long-term bet: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
✅Draws 120W instead of 250W, a 130W reduction.
✅Measures 229mm instead of 267mm, a 38mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX TITAN X across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.

GeForce GTX TITAN X

2015

Why buy it

✅6.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 6 GB).

Trade-offs

❌2015 hardware with 12 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
❌
258.1% HIGHER MSRP
$999 MSRPvs$279 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 12.6 vs 45.7 G3D/$ ($999 MSRP vs $279 MSRP).
❌108.3% higher power demand at 250W vs 120W.
❌16.6% longer card at 267mm vs 229mm.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce GTX TITAN X is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 6.2% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward GeForce GTX 1660 Ti instead at 12,747 vs 12,621, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 12nm process instead of 28nm and a newer 2019 generation instead of 2015. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti makes the most sense to buy today. It is $720 cheaper on MSRP at $279 vs $999, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 261.6% (45.7 vs 12.6), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. GeForce GTX TITAN X still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs GeForce GTX TITAN X Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 22 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1770 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 120W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,747 points. Launch price was $279.

GeForce GTX TITAN X

The GeForce GTX TITAN X is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 17 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1075 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,621 points. Launch price was $999.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti scores 12,747 and the GeForce GTX TITAN X reaches 12,621 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti is built on Turing while the GeForce GTX TITAN X uses Maxwell 2.0, both on 12 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,536 (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti) vs 3,072 (GeForce GTX TITAN X). Raw compute: 5.437 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti) vs 6.691 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX TITAN X). Boost clocks: 1770 MHz vs 1075 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1660 Ti	GeForce GTX TITAN X
G3D Mark Score	12,747	12,621
Architecture	Turing	Maxwell 2.0
Process Node	12 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	1536	3072+100%
Compute (TFLOPS)	5.437 TFLOPS	6.691 TFLOPS+23%
Boost Clock	1770 MHz+65%	1075 MHz
ROPs	48	96+100%
TMUs	96	192+100%
L1 Cache	1.5 MB+36%	1.1 MB
L2 Cache	1.5 MB	3 MB+100%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce GTX 1660 Ti	GeForce GTX TITAN X
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti has 6 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX TITAN X carries 12 GB. GeForce GTX TITAN X gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 288 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti) vs 336 GB/s (GeForce GTX TITAN X) — a 16.7% advantage for the GeForce GTX TITAN X. Memory bus width is 192-bit on the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti and 384-bit on the GeForce GTX TITAN X. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti) vs 3 MB (GeForce GTX TITAN X) — the GeForce GTX TITAN X has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1660 Ti	GeForce GTX TITAN X
VRAM Capacity	6 GB	12 GB+100%
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	288 GB/s	336 GB/s+17%
Bus Width	192-bit	384-bit+100%
L2 Cache	1.5 MB	3 MB+100%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti) vs 12 (FL 12_1) (GeForce GTX TITAN X). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1660 Ti	GeForce GTX TITAN X
DirectX	12	12 (FL 12_1)
Vulkan	1.4+8%	1.3
OpenGL	4.6+2%	4.5
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th gen (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti) vs NVENC 2nd gen (GeForce GTX TITAN X). Decoder: NVDEC 4th gen vs NVDEC 2nd gen. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce GTX TITAN X).

Feature	GeForce GTX 1660 Ti	GeForce GTX TITAN X
Encoder	NVENC 7th gen	NVENC 2nd gen
Decoder	NVDEC 4th gen	NVDEC 2nd gen
Codecs	H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9	H.264,H.265/HEVC

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti draws 120W versus the GeForce GTX TITAN X's 250W — a 70.3% difference. The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti) vs 600W (GeForce GTX TITAN X). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 6-pin + 8-pin. Card length: 229mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 83°C.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1660 Ti	GeForce GTX TITAN X
TDP	120W-52%	250W
Recommended PSU	450W-25%	600W
Power Connector	8-pin	6-pin + 8-pin
Length	229mm	267mm
Height	111mm	111mm
Slots	2	2
Temp (Load)	75°C-10%	83°C
Perf/Watt	106.2+110%	50.5

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti came in at $279, while the GeForce GTX TITAN X launched at $999. On MSRP, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti was 72.1% cheaper ($720 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 45.7 (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti) vs 12.6 (GeForce GTX TITAN X) — the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti offers 262.7% better value. The newer card here is GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (2019 vs 2015).

Feature	GeForce GTX 1660 Ti	GeForce GTX TITAN X
MSRP	$279-72%	$999
Performance per Dollar	45.7+263%	12.6
Codename	TU116	GM200
Release	February 22 2019	March 17 2015
Ranking	#204	#209

Search GeForce GTX 1660 Ti on Amazon

Search GeForce GTX TITAN X on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.