GeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU

#57

Quadro RTX 3000

MSRP: $800|Avg: $891

155%

#58

RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell

MSRP: $1999|Avg: $1700

152%

#59

Radeon Vega Frontier Edition

MSRP: $999|Avg: $150

146%

#60

Radeon Pro WX 8200

MSRP: $999|Avg: $350

144%

#62

RTX A4500

MSRP: $1699|Avg: $800

142%

#63

RTX 4500 Ada Generation

MSRP: $2250|Avg: $2000

141%

#64

RTX 4000 Ada Generation

MSRP: $1999|Avg: $1547

137%

#65

RTX A4000H

MSRP: $1000|Avg: $927

135%

#66

Radeon PRO W7800

MSRP: $2499|Avg: $2200

124%

#67

RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation

MSRP: $1999|Avg: $1450

118%

#70

Radeon PRO W6800

MSRP: $2249|Avg: $2249

103%

#71

Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

#72

Quadro P4200

MSRP: $1200|Avg: $110

99%

#74

RTX 5000 Ada Generation

MSRP: $4000|Avg: $4095

87%

#75

Radeon Pro Vega II

MSRP: $2199|Avg: $1800

81%

#76

Radeon PRO W7900

MSRP: $3999|Avg: $3500

81%

#77

Radeon Pro VII

MSRP: $1899|Avg: $1400

80%

#78

Quadro RTX 5000

MSRP: $2299|Avg: $692

77%

#79

Quadro RTX 5000 (móvel)

MSRP: $2299|Avg: $692

76%

#80

Radeon Pro W6800X

MSRP: $2799|Avg: $2799

73%

#81

Tesla T10

MSRP: $2000|Avg: $975

72%

#82

RTX A5000

MSRP: $3721|Avg: $1800

71%

#83

Radeon Pro Vega 64X

MSRP: $2200|Avg: $2200

69%

#84

Radeon PRO V710

MSRP: $2000|Avg: $2000

69%

#85

RTX A5500

MSRP: $3600|Avg: $2200

67%

#86

Radeon Pro WX 9100

MSRP: $2199|Avg: $550

64%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3% higher G3D Mark score and 366.7% more VRAM (28 GB vs 6 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti.

Insight	GeForce GTX 1660 Ti	Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-3%)	✅Leading raw performance (+3%)
Longevity	Turing (2018−2022) (12nm)	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / RDNA 3.0)
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	🎮 High Capacity (6 GB)	✅ More VRAM (+366.7%)
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly	Standard Size (267mm)

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Benchmark Check

Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1660 Ti and Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 22 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1770 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 120W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,747 points. Launch price was $279.

Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU

The Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 26 2018. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1500 MHz. It has 3584 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 158W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,130 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti scores 12,747 and the Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU reaches 13,130 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti is built on Turing while the Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU uses GCN 5.0, both on 12 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 1,536 (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti) vs 3,584 (Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU). Raw compute: 5.437 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti) vs 10.75 TFLOPS ×2 (Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU). Boost clocks: 1770 MHz vs 1500 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1660 Ti	Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU
G3D Mark Score	12,747	13,130+3%
Architecture	Turing	GCN 5.0
Process Node	12 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	1536	3584 ×2+133%
Compute (TFLOPS)	5.437 TFLOPS	10.75 TFLOPS ×2+98%
Boost Clock	1770 MHz+18%	1500 MHz
ROPs	48	64 ×2+33%
TMUs	96	224 ×2+133%
L1 Cache	1.5 MB+70%	0.88 MB
L2 Cache	1.5 MB	4 MB+167%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce GTX 1660 Ti	Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU
Upscaling Tech	FSR 2.1 (Compatible)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	FSR 3 (Compatible)	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU has 28 GB. The Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU offers 366.7% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti) vs 4 MB (Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU) — the Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1660 Ti	Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU
VRAM Capacity	6 GB	28 GB+367%
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Bus Width	192-bit	256-bit+33%
L2 Cache	1.5 MB	4 MB+167%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti) vs 12.2 (Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1660 Ti	Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU
DirectX	12	12.2+2%
Vulkan	1.4+8%	1.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	0

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th gen (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU). Decoder: NVDEC 4th gen vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU).

Feature	GeForce GTX 1660 Ti	Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU
Encoder	NVENC 7th gen	VCN 4.0
Decoder	NVDEC 4th gen	VCN 4.0
Codecs	H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti draws 120W versus the Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU's 158W — a 27.3% difference. The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti) vs 500W (Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 229mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 80°C.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1660 Ti	Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU
TDP	120W-24%	158W
Recommended PSU	450W-10%	500W
Power Connector	8-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	229mm	267mm
Height	111mm	111mm
Slots	2	1-50%
Temp (Load)	75°C-6%	80°C
Perf/Watt	106.2+28%	83.1