G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

2019

Why buy it

✅7.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 45.7 vs 0 G3D/$ ($279 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile is the safer long-term pick here because the hardware is newer and the feature stack is stronger.
❌242.9% higher power demand at 120W vs 35W.

RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile

2025

Why buy it

✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
✅Better long-term bet: Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
✅Draws 35W instead of 120W, a 85W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 1660 Ti across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 45.7 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $279 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 7.1% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile instead at 13,209 vs 12,747, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 8 GB vs 6 GB of VRAM, a 5nm process instead of 12nm, 14 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2025 generation instead of 2019. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and lighter 1440p, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and lighter 1440p headroom, RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 22 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1770 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 120W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,747 points. Launch price was $279.

RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile

The RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 19 2025. It features the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2235 MHz to 2520 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 14 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,209 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti scores 12,747 and the RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile reaches 13,209 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti is built on Turing while the RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile uses Blackwell 2.0, both on 12 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 1,536 (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti) vs 1,792 (RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile). Raw compute: 5.437 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti) vs 9.032 TFLOPS (RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile). Boost clocks: 1770 MHz vs 2520 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1660 Ti	RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile
G3D Mark Score	12,747	13,209+4%
Architecture	Turing	Blackwell 2.0
Process Node	12 nm	5 nm
Shading Units	1536	1792+17%
Compute (TFLOPS)	5.437 TFLOPS	9.032 TFLOPS+66%
Boost Clock	1770 MHz	2520 MHz+42%
ROPs	48+100%	24
TMUs	96+71%	56
L1 Cache	1.5 MB	1.8 MB+20%
L2 Cache	1.5 MB	24 MB+1500%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce GTX 1660 Ti	RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti has 6 GB of VRAM, while the RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile carries 8 GB. RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile gives you 33.3% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 192-bit on the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti and 256-bit on the RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti) vs 24 MB (RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile) — the RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1660 Ti	RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile
VRAM Capacity	6 GB	8 GB+33%
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Bus Width	192-bit	256-bit+33%
L2 Cache	1.5 MB	24 MB+1500%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti) vs 12.0 (RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 1.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1660 Ti	RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile
DirectX	12	12.0
Vulkan	1.4	1.4
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4+300%	1

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th gen (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti) vs 9th Gen NVENC (RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile). Decoder: NVDEC 4th gen vs 6th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile).

Feature	GeForce GTX 1660 Ti	RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile
Encoder	NVENC 7th gen	9th Gen NVENC
Decoder	NVDEC 4th gen	6th Gen NVDEC
Codecs	H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti draws 120W versus the RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile's 35W — a 109.7% difference. The RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti) vs 500W (RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 229mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 80°C.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1660 Ti	RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile
TDP	120W	35W-71%
Recommended PSU	450W-10%	500W
Power Connector	8-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	229mm	0mm
Height	111mm	0mm
Slots	2	0-100%
Temp (Load)	75°C-6%	80°C
Perf/Watt	106.2	377.4+255%

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile (2025 vs 2019).

Feature	GeForce GTX 1660 Ti	RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile
MSRP	$279	—
Codename	TU116	GB207
Release	February 22 2019	March 19 2025
Ranking	#204	#244

Search GeForce GTX 1660 Ti on Amazon

Search RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.