GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
Radeon RX 5700M
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs Radeon RX 5700M Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs Radeon RX 5700M FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs Radeon RX 5700M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
2019Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 45.7 vs 0 G3D/$ ($279 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Draws 120W instead of 180W, a 60W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 5700M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Radeon RX 5700M is the safer long-term pick here because the hardware is newer and the feature stack is stronger.
Radeon RX 5700M
2020Why buy it
- ✅4.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 45.7 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $279 MSRP).
- ❌50% higher power demand at 180W vs 120W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs Radeon RX 5700M Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 22 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1770 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 120W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,747 points. Launch price was $279.
Radeon RX 5700M
The Radeon RX 5700M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 1 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1465 MHz to 1720 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,669 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti scores 12,747 and the Radeon RX 5700M reaches 12,669 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti is built on Turing while the Radeon RX 5700M uses RDNA 1.0, both on 12 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 1,536 (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti) vs 2,304 (Radeon RX 5700M). Raw compute: 5.437 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti) vs 7.926 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 5700M). Boost clocks: 1770 MHz vs 1720 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti | Radeon RX 5700M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 12,747 | 12,669 |
| Architecture | Turing | RDNA 1.0 |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 1536 | 2304+50% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 5.437 TFLOPS | 7.926 TFLOPS+46% |
| Boost Clock | 1770 MHz+3% | 1720 MHz |
| ROPs | 48 | 64+33% |
| TMUs | 96 | 144+50% |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 8 MB+433% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The clearest feature edge for the Radeon RX 5700M is support for FSR Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon RX 5700M leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti | Radeon RX 5700M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti has 6 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 5700M carries 8 GB. Radeon RX 5700M gives you 33.3% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 288 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti) vs 384 GB/s (Radeon RX 5700M) — a 33.3% advantage for the Radeon RX 5700M. Memory bus width is 192-bit on the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti and 256-bit on the Radeon RX 5700M. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti) vs 8 MB (Radeon RX 5700M) — the Radeon RX 5700M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti | Radeon RX 5700M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | 8 GB+33% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 288 GB/s | 384 GB/s+33% |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 256-bit+33% |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 8 MB+433% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti) vs 12.1 (Radeon RX 5700M). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti | Radeon RX 5700M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.4+17% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th gen (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti) vs VCN 2.0 (Radeon RX 5700M). Decoder: NVDEC 4th gen vs VCN 2.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon RX 5700M).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti | Radeon RX 5700M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 7th gen | VCN 2.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC 4th gen | VCN 2.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti draws 120W versus the Radeon RX 5700M's 180W — a 40% difference. The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti) vs 500W (Radeon RX 5700M). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 229mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti | Radeon RX 5700M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 120W-33% | 180W |
| Recommended PSU | 450W-10% | 500W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 229mm | 0mm |
| Height | 111mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-12% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 106.2+51% | 70.4 |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is Radeon RX 5700M (2020 vs 2019).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti | Radeon RX 5700M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $279 | — |
| Codename | TU116 | Navi 10 |
| Release | February 22 2019 | March 1 2020 |
| Ranking | #204 | #751 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce GTX 1660 Ti and Radeon RX 5700M
