GeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs Radeon Vega Frontier Edition

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

2019Core: 1500 MHzBoost: 1770 MHz
VS
AMD

Radeon Vega Frontier Edition

2017Core: 1382 MHzBoost: 1600 MHz

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs Radeon Vega Frontier Edition Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs Radeon Vega Frontier Edition FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs Radeon Vega Frontier Edition: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

2019

Why buy it

  • 2.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Costs $720 less on MSRP ($279 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
  • Delivers 257.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 45.7 vs 12.8 G3D/$ ($279 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
  • 100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs Unknown).
  • Better long-term bet: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.

Radeon Vega Frontier Edition

2017

Why buy it

  • Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 1660 Ti across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2017 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 258.1% HIGHER MSRP
    $999 MSRPvs$279 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 12.8 vs 45.7 G3D/$ ($999 MSRP vs $279 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 2.6% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Radeon Vega Frontier Edition instead at 12,753 vs 12,747, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 6 GB vs Unknown of VRAM, a 12nm process instead of 14nm, and a newer 2019 generation instead of 2017. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti makes the most sense to buy today. It is $720 cheaper on MSRP at $279 vs $999, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 257.9% (45.7 vs 12.8), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs Radeon Vega Frontier Edition Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 22 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1770 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 120W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,747 points. Launch price was $279.

AMD

Radeon Vega Frontier Edition

The Radeon Vega Frontier Edition is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 27 2017. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1382 MHz to 1600 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,753 points. Launch price was $999.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti scores 12,747 and the Radeon Vega Frontier Edition reaches 12,753 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti is built on Turing while the Radeon Vega Frontier Edition uses GCN 5.0, both on 12 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 1,536 (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti) vs 4,096 (Radeon Vega Frontier Edition). Raw compute: 5.437 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti) vs 13.11 TFLOPS (Radeon Vega Frontier Edition). Boost clocks: 1770 MHz vs 1600 MHz.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1660 TiRadeon Vega Frontier Edition
G3D Mark Score
12,747
12,753
Architecture
Turing
GCN 5.0
Process Node
12 nm
14 nm
Shading Units
1536
4096+167%
Compute (TFLOPS)
5.437 TFLOPS
13.11 TFLOPS+141%
Boost Clock
1770 MHz+11%
1600 MHz
ROPs
48
64+33%
TMUs
96
256+167%
L1 Cache
1.5 MB+50%
1 MB
L2 Cache
1.5 MB
4 MB+167%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon Vega Frontier Edition leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1660 TiRadeon Vega Frontier Edition
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti has 6 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Vega Frontier Edition carries 0 MB. GeForce GTX 1660 Ti gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 192-bit on the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti and System on the Radeon Vega Frontier Edition. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti) vs 4 MB (Radeon Vega Frontier Edition) — the Radeon Vega Frontier Edition has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1660 TiRadeon Vega Frontier Edition
VRAM Capacity
6 GB
Shared System RAM
Memory Type
GDDR6
Shared
Memory Bandwidth
288 GB/s
System
Bus Width
192-bit
System
L2 Cache
1.5 MB
4 MB+167%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti) vs 12.1 (Radeon Vega Frontier Edition). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1660 TiRadeon Vega Frontier Edition
DirectX
12
12.1
Vulkan
1.4+27%
1.1
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th gen (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti) vs VCE 4.0 (Radeon Vega Frontier Edition). Decoder: NVDEC 4th gen vs UVD 7.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Vega Frontier Edition).

FeatureGeForce GTX 1660 TiRadeon Vega Frontier Edition
Encoder
NVENC 7th gen
VCE 4.0
Decoder
NVDEC 4th gen
UVD 7.0
Codecs
H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti draws 120W versus the Radeon Vega Frontier Edition's 300W — a 85.7% difference. The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti) vs 1W (Radeon Vega Frontier Edition). Power connectors: 8-pin vs Integrated. Card length: 229mm vs 268mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 85°C.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1660 TiRadeon Vega Frontier Edition
TDP
120W-60%
300W
Recommended PSU
450W
1W-100%
Power Connector
8-pin
Integrated
Length
229mm
268mm
Height
111mm
105mm
Slots
2
2
Temp (Load)
75°C-12%
85°C
Perf/Watt
106.2+150%
42.5
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti came in at $279, while the Radeon Vega Frontier Edition launched at $999. On MSRP, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti was 72.1% cheaper ($720 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 45.7 (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti) vs 12.8 (Radeon Vega Frontier Edition) — the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti offers 257% better value. The newer card here is GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (2019 vs 2017).

FeatureGeForce GTX 1660 TiRadeon Vega Frontier Edition
MSRP
$279-72%
$999
Performance per Dollar
45.7+257%
12.8
Codename
TU116
Vega 10
Release
February 22 2019
June 27 2017
Ranking
#204
#203

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.