
GeForce3 Ti 200
Popular choices:

RADEON 7200
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce3 Ti 200 is positioned at rank 382 and the RADEON 7200 is on rank 750, so the GeForce3 Ti 200 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce3 Ti 200
Performance Per Dollar RADEON 7200
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce3 Ti 200 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 33.3% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the RADEON 7200.
| Insight | GeForce3 Ti 200 | RADEON 7200 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+33.3%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-33.3%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / Turing (2018−2022)) | GCN 3.0 (2014−2019) (28nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce3 Ti 200 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $49 (vs $45), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 22.4% better value per dollar than the RADEON 7200.
| Insight | GeForce3 Ti 200 | RADEON 7200 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+22.4%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($49) | ✅More affordable ($45) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce3 Ti 200 and RADEON 7200

GeForce3 Ti 200
The GeForce3 Ti 200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 20 2018. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1515 MHz to 1710 MHz. It has 2944 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 215W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4 points. Launch price was $699.

RADEON 7200
The RADEON 7200 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 13 2019. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 730 MHz to 1024 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce3 Ti 200 scores 4 versus the RADEON 7200's 3 — the GeForce3 Ti 200 leads by 33.3%. The GeForce3 Ti 200 is built on Turing while the RADEON 7200 uses GCN 3.0, both on 12 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 2,944 (GeForce3 Ti 200) vs 384 (RADEON 7200). Raw compute: 10.07 TFLOPS (GeForce3 Ti 200) vs 0.7864 TFLOPS (RADEON 7200). Boost clocks: 1710 MHz vs 1024 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce3 Ti 200 | RADEON 7200 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4+33% | 3 |
| Architecture | Turing | GCN 3.0 |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 2944+667% | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 10.07 TFLOPS+1181% | 0.7864 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1710 MHz+67% | 1024 MHz |
| ROPs | 64+700% | 8 |
| TMUs | 184+667% | 24 |
| L1 Cache | 2.9 MB+3122% | 0.09 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+2977% | 0.13 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce3 Ti 200 | RADEON 7200 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (GeForce3 Ti 200) vs 0.13 MB (RADEON 7200) — the GeForce3 Ti 200 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce3 Ti 200 | RADEON 7200 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+2977% | 0.13 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 8.1 (GeForce3 Ti 200) vs 7.0 (RADEON 7200). Vulkan: N/A vs N/A. OpenGL: 1.3 vs 1.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 1.
| Feature | GeForce3 Ti 200 | RADEON 7200 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 8.1+16% | 7.0 |
| Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
| OpenGL | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| Max Displays | 2+100% | 1 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (GeForce3 Ti 200) vs None (RADEON 7200). Decoder: None vs MPEG-2 Motion Comp. Supported codecs: MPEG-2 (GeForce3 Ti 200) vs MPEG-2 (RADEON 7200).
| Feature | GeForce3 Ti 200 | RADEON 7200 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | None |
| Decoder | None | MPEG-2 Motion Comp |
| Codecs | MPEG-2 | MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce3 Ti 200 draws 215W versus the RADEON 7200's 50W — a 124.5% difference. The RADEON 7200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce3 Ti 200) vs 350W (RADEON 7200). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy. Card length: 183mm vs 0mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 60 vs 70.
| Feature | GeForce3 Ti 200 | RADEON 7200 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 215W | 50W-77% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Legacy |
| Length | 183mm | 0mm |
| Height | 100mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 1 | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 60-14% | 70 |
| Perf/Watt | 0.0 | 0.1 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce3 Ti 200 launched at $149 MSRP and currently averages $49, while the RADEON 7200 launched at $99 and now averages $45. The RADEON 7200 costs 8.2% less ($4 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 0.1 (GeForce3 Ti 200) vs 0.1 (RADEON 7200) — the RADEON 7200 offers 0% better value. The RADEON 7200 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2018).
| Feature | GeForce3 Ti 200 | RADEON 7200 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $149 | $99-34% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $49 | $45-8% |
| Performance per Dollar | 0.1 | 0.1 |
| Codename | TU104 | Polaris 24 |
| Release | September 20 2018 | May 13 2019 |
| Ranking | #94 | #898 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















