Chipversus Index
Jump to Section

GeForce3 Ti 200 vs GeForce4 MX 440

CPUCPUGPUGPU
NVIDIA

GeForce3 Ti 200

2018Core: 1515 MHzBoost: 1710 MHz
Similar parts
······
Buy on Amazon
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce4 MX 440

2020Core: 1395 MHzBoost: 1575 MHz
Similar parts
·······
Buy on Amazon

GeForce3 Ti 200 vs GeForce4 MX 440 Performance Spectrum

GeForce3 Ti 200
0.5 GB 215
4
0.0%
brand logoGeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB
brand logoGeForce GTX 780 Ti
brand logoGeForce RTX 4050 Mobile
brand logoGeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
brand logoRTX 4000 Ada Generation
brand logoGeForce RTX 5070
brand logoGeForce RTX 4080 SUPER
brand logoGeForce RTX 4090
GeForce4 MX 440
0.063 GB 25
5
+25.0%
brand logoGeForce 6200A
brand logoGeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB
brand logoGeForce GTX 780 Ti
brand logoGeForce RTX 4050 Mobile
brand logoGeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
brand logoRTX 4000 Ada Generation
brand logoGeForce RTX 5070
brand logoGeForce RTX 4080 SUPER

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce3 Ti 200 vs GeForce4 MX 440 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

1080P
GeForce3 Ti 200
low1 FPS
medium1 FPS
high1 FPS
ultra1 FPS
1080P
GeForce4 MX 440
low1 FPS
medium1 FPS
high1 FPS
ultra1 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

1080P
GeForce3 Ti 200
low1 FPS
medium1 FPS
high1 FPS
ultra1 FPS
1080P
GeForce4 MX 440
low1 FPS
medium1 FPS
high1 FPS
ultra1 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

1080P
GeForce3 Ti 200
low1 FPS
medium1 FPS
high1 FPS
ultra1 FPS
1080P
GeForce4 MX 440
low1 FPS
medium1 FPS
high1 FPS
ultra1 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

1080P
GeForce3 Ti 200
low1 FPS
medium1 FPS
high1 FPS
ultra1 FPS
1080P
GeForce4 MX 440
low1 FPS
medium1 FPS
high1 FPS
ultra1 FPS
Among Us

Among Us

1080P
GeForce3 Ti 200
low1 FPS
medium1 FPS
high1 FPS
ultra1 FPS
1080P
GeForce4 MX 440
low1 FPS
medium1 FPS
high1 FPS
ultra1 FPS
Apex Legends

Apex Legends

1080P
GeForce3 Ti 200
low1 FPS
medium1 FPS
high1 FPS
ultra1 FPS
1080P
GeForce4 MX 440
low1 FPS
medium1 FPS
high1 FPS
ultra1 FPS
ARC Raiders

ARC Raiders

1080P
GeForce3 Ti 200
low1 FPS
medium1 FPS
high1 FPS
ultra1 FPS
1080P
GeForce4 MX 440
low1 FPS
medium1 FPS
high1 FPS
ultra1 FPS
Baldur's Gate 3

Baldur's Gate 3

1080P
GeForce3 Ti 200
low1 FPS
medium1 FPS
high1 FPS
ultra1 FPS
1080P
GeForce4 MX 440
low1 FPS
medium1 FPS
high1 FPS
ultra1 FPS
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6

1080P
GeForce3 Ti 200
low1 FPS
medium1 FPS
high1 FPS
ultra1 FPS
1080P
GeForce4 MX 440
low1 FPS
medium1 FPS
high1 FPS
ultra1 FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone

Call of Duty: Warzone

1080P
GeForce3 Ti 200
low1 FPS
medium1 FPS
high1 FPS
ultra1 FPS
1080P
GeForce4 MX 440
low1 FPS
medium1 FPS
high1 FPS
ultra1 FPS
Check FPS with Custom Builds

GeForce3 Ti 200 vs GeForce4 MX 440: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce3 Ti 200

2018

Why buy it

  • ✅693.7% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 65 MB).

Trade-offs

  • ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (4 vs 5).
  • ❌2018 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
  • ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.0 vs 0.0 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
  • ❌760% higher power demand at 215W vs 25W.
  • ❌10.9% longer card at 183mm vs 165mm.

GeForce4 MX 440

2020

Why buy it

  • ✅+25% higher PassMark G3D performance.
  • ✅Delivers 25% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.0 vs 0.0 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
  • ✅GeForce3 Ti 200 is already legacy-tier future-proofing, so GeForce4 MX 440 is the less risky modern option long term.
  • ✅Draws 25W instead of 215W, a 190W reduction.
  • ✅Measures 165mm instead of 183mm, a 18mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Less VRAM, with 65 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • ❌2020 hardware with 65 MB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce4 MX 440 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 25% in PassMark G3D (5 vs 4), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce4 MX 440 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a newer 2020 generation instead of 2018. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce4 MX 440 makes the most sense to buy today. It is priced the same on MSRP at $149 vs $149, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 25% (0.0 vs 0.0), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce3 Ti 200 vs GeForce4 MX 440 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce3 Ti 200

The GeForce3 Ti 200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 20 2018. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1515 MHz to 1710 MHz. It has 2944 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 215W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4 points. Launch price was $699.

NVIDIA

GeForce4 MX 440

The GeForce4 MX 440 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 1 2020. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1395 MHz to 1575 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce3 Ti 200 scores 4 versus the GeForce4 MX 440's 5 — the GeForce4 MX 440 leads by 25%. The GeForce3 Ti 200 is built on Turing while the GeForce4 MX 440 uses Turing, both on a 12 nm process. Shader units: 2,944 (GeForce3 Ti 200) vs 896 (GeForce4 MX 440). Raw compute: 10.07 TFLOPS (GeForce3 Ti 200) vs 3.226 TFLOPS (GeForce4 MX 440). Boost clocks: 1710 MHz vs 1575 MHz.

FeatureGeForce3 Ti 200GeForce4 MX 440
G3D Mark Score
4
5+25%
Architecture
Turing
Turing
Process Node
12 nm
12 nm
Shading Units
2944+229%
896
Compute (TFLOPS)
10.07 TFLOPS+212%
3.226 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
1710 MHz+9%
1575 MHz
ROPs
64+100%
32
TMUs
184+188%
64
✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce3 Ti 200GeForce4 MX 440
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce3 Ti 200 has 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce4 MX 440 carries 65 MB. GeForce3 Ti 200 gives you 693.7% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce3 Ti 200 and 64-bit on the GeForce4 MX 440.

FeatureGeForce3 Ti 200GeForce4 MX 440
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB+694%
0.063 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
64-bit
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 8.1 (GeForce3 Ti 200) vs 7.0 (GeForce4 MX 440). OpenGL: 1.3 vs 1.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

FeatureGeForce3 Ti 200GeForce4 MX 440
DirectX
8.1+16%
7.0
OpenGL
1.3
1.5+15%
Max Displays
2
2
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: None (GeForce3 Ti 200) vs None (GeForce4 MX 440). Decoder: None vs MPEG-2 Decoder. Supported codecs: MPEG-2 (GeForce3 Ti 200) vs MPEG-2 (GeForce4 MX 440).

FeatureGeForce3 Ti 200GeForce4 MX 440
Encoder
None
None
Decoder
None
MPEG-2 Decoder
Codecs
MPEG-2
MPEG-2
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce3 Ti 200 draws 215W versus the GeForce4 MX 440's 25W — a 158.3% difference. The GeForce4 MX 440 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce3 Ti 200) vs 350W (GeForce4 MX 440). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 183mm vs 165mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 60 vs 60°C.

FeatureGeForce3 Ti 200GeForce4 MX 440
TDP
215W
25W-88%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
183mm
165mm
Height
100mm
100mm
Slots
1
1
Temp (Load)
60
60°C
Perf/Watt
0.0
0.2
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce3 Ti 200 came in at $149, while the GeForce4 MX 440 launched at $149. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.0 (GeForce3 Ti 200) vs 0.0 (GeForce4 MX 440) — the GeForce4 MX 440 offers 0% better value. The newer card here is GeForce4 MX 440 (2020 vs 2018).

FeatureGeForce3 Ti 200GeForce4 MX 440
MSRP
$149
$149
Performance per Dollar
0.0
0.0
Codename
TU104
N17S-G5 / GP107-670-A1
Release
September 20 2018
August 1 2020
Ranking
#94
#523
Search GeForce3 Ti 200 on AmazonSearch GeForce4 MX 440 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.