Chipversus Index
Jump to Section

GeForce3 Ti 200 vs RADEON 9200 SE

CPUCPUGPUGPU
NVIDIA

GeForce3 Ti 200

2018Core: 1515 MHzBoost: 1710 MHz
Buy on Amazon
VS
AMD

RADEON 9200 SE

2025Core: 1295 MHzBoost: 2900 MHz
Similar parts
·······
Buy on Amazon

GeForce3 Ti 200 vs RADEON 9200 SE Performance Spectrum

GeForce3 Ti 200
0.5 GB 215
4
+33.3%
brand logoGeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB
brand logoGeForce GTX 780 Ti
brand logoGeForce RTX 4050 Mobile
brand logoGeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
brand logoRTX 4000 Ada Generation
brand logoGeForce RTX 5070
brand logoGeForce RTX 4080 SUPER
brand logoGeForce RTX 4090
RADEON 9200 SE
0.25 GB 55
3
0.0%
brand logoRadeon R9 370
brand logoRadeon R9 Fury
brand logoRadeon RX 5700
brand logoRadeon RX 6700
brand logoRadeon RX 7800 XT
brand logoRadeon RX 7900 XT

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce3 Ti 200 vs RADEON 9200 SE FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

1080P
GeForce3 Ti 200
low1 FPS
medium1 FPS
high1 FPS
ultra1 FPS
1080P
RADEON 9200 SE
low1 FPS
medium1 FPS
high1 FPS
ultra1 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

1080P
GeForce3 Ti 200
low1 FPS
medium1 FPS
high1 FPS
ultra1 FPS
1080P
RADEON 9200 SE
low1 FPS
medium1 FPS
high1 FPS
ultra1 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

1080P
GeForce3 Ti 200
low1 FPS
medium1 FPS
high1 FPS
ultra1 FPS
1080P
RADEON 9200 SE
low1 FPS
medium1 FPS
high1 FPS
ultra1 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

1080P
GeForce3 Ti 200
low1 FPS
medium1 FPS
high1 FPS
ultra1 FPS
1080P
RADEON 9200 SE
low1 FPS
medium1 FPS
high1 FPS
ultra1 FPS
Among Us

Among Us

1080P
GeForce3 Ti 200
low1 FPS
medium1 FPS
high1 FPS
ultra1 FPS
1080P
RADEON 9200 SE
low1 FPS
medium1 FPS
high1 FPS
ultra1 FPS
Apex Legends

Apex Legends

1080P
GeForce3 Ti 200
low1 FPS
medium1 FPS
high1 FPS
ultra1 FPS
1080P
RADEON 9200 SE
low1 FPS
medium1 FPS
high1 FPS
ultra1 FPS
ARC Raiders

ARC Raiders

1080P
GeForce3 Ti 200
low1 FPS
medium1 FPS
high1 FPS
ultra1 FPS
1080P
RADEON 9200 SE
low1 FPS
medium1 FPS
high1 FPS
ultra1 FPS
Baldur's Gate 3

Baldur's Gate 3

1080P
GeForce3 Ti 200
low1 FPS
medium1 FPS
high1 FPS
ultra1 FPS
1080P
RADEON 9200 SE
low1 FPS
medium1 FPS
high1 FPS
ultra1 FPS
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6

1080P
GeForce3 Ti 200
low1 FPS
medium1 FPS
high1 FPS
ultra1 FPS
1080P
RADEON 9200 SE
low1 FPS
medium1 FPS
high1 FPS
ultra1 FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone

Call of Duty: Warzone

1080P
GeForce3 Ti 200
low1 FPS
medium1 FPS
high1 FPS
ultra1 FPS
1080P
RADEON 9200 SE
low1 FPS
medium1 FPS
high1 FPS
ultra1 FPS
Check FPS with Custom Builds

GeForce3 Ti 200 vs RADEON 9200 SE: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce3 Ti 200

2018

Why buy it

  • ✅+33.3% higher PassMark G3D performance.
  • ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 256 MB).

Trade-offs

  • ❌2018 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
  • ❌
    396.7% HIGHER MSRP
    $149 MSRPvs$30 MSRP
  • ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.0 vs 0.1 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $30 MSRP).
  • ❌290.9% higher power demand at 215W vs 55W.

RADEON 9200 SE

2025

Why buy it

  • ✅Costs $119 less on MSRP ($30 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
  • ✅Delivers 272.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.1 vs 0.0 G3D/$ ($30 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
  • ✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025) on 4nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
  • ✅Draws 55W instead of 215W, a 160W reduction.
  • ✅Measures 168mm instead of 183mm, a 15mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (3 vs 4).
  • ❌Less VRAM, with 256 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce3 Ti 200 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 33.3% in PassMark G3D (4 vs 3), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
RADEON 9200 SE is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 4nm process instead of 12nm, and a newer 2025 generation instead of 2018. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
RADEON 9200 SE makes the most sense to buy today. It is $119 cheaper on MSRP at $30 vs $149, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 272.5% (0.1 vs 0.0), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. GeForce3 Ti 200 still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GeForce3 Ti 200 vs RADEON 9200 SE Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce3 Ti 200

The GeForce3 Ti 200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 20 2018. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1515 MHz to 1710 MHz. It has 2944 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 215W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4 points. Launch price was $699.

AMD

RADEON 9200 SE

The RADEON 9200 SE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 6 2025. It features the RDNA 3.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1295 MHz to 2900 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 40 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce3 Ti 200 scores 4 versus the RADEON 9200 SE's 3 — the GeForce3 Ti 200 leads by 33.3%. The GeForce3 Ti 200 is built on Turing while the RADEON 9200 SE uses RDNA 3.5, both on 12 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 2,944 (GeForce3 Ti 200) vs 2,560 (RADEON 9200 SE). Raw compute: 10.07 TFLOPS (GeForce3 Ti 200) vs 14.85 TFLOPS (RADEON 9200 SE). Boost clocks: 1710 MHz vs 2900 MHz. Ray tracing: 46 RT cores (GeForce3 Ti 200) vs 40 (RADEON 9200 SE) with 368 Tensor cores.

FeatureGeForce3 Ti 200RADEON 9200 SE
G3D Mark Score
4+33%
3
Architecture
Turing
RDNA 3.5
Process Node
12 nm
4 nm
Shading Units
2944+15%
2560
Compute (TFLOPS)
10.07 TFLOPS
14.85 TFLOPS+47%
Boost Clock
1710 MHz
2900 MHz+70%
ROPs
64
64
TMUs
184+15%
160
L2 Cache
4 MB
8 MB+100%
Ray Tracing Cores
46+15%
40
✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce3 Ti 200 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The RADEON 9200 SE leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce3 Ti 200RADEON 9200 SE
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce3 Ti 200 has 512 MB of VRAM, while the RADEON 9200 SE carries 256 MB. GeForce3 Ti 200 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce3 Ti 200 and 64-bit on the RADEON 9200 SE. L2 Cache: 4 MB (GeForce3 Ti 200) vs 8 MB (RADEON 9200 SE) — the RADEON 9200 SE has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce3 Ti 200RADEON 9200 SE
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB+100%
0.25 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
64-bit
L2 Cache
4 MB
8 MB+100%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 8.1 (GeForce3 Ti 200) vs 8.1 (RADEON 9200 SE). Vulkan: N/A vs N/A. OpenGL: 1.3 vs 1.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

FeatureGeForce3 Ti 200RADEON 9200 SE
DirectX
8.1
8.1
Vulkan
N/A
N/A
OpenGL
1.3
1.3
Max Displays
2
2
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: None (GeForce3 Ti 200) vs None (RADEON 9200 SE). Decoder: None vs None. Supported codecs: MPEG-2 (GeForce3 Ti 200) vs MPEG-2 (RADEON 9200 SE).

FeatureGeForce3 Ti 200RADEON 9200 SE
Encoder
None
None
Decoder
None
None
Codecs
MPEG-2
MPEG-2
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce3 Ti 200 draws 215W versus the RADEON 9200 SE's 55W — a 118.5% difference. The RADEON 9200 SE is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce3 Ti 200) vs 350W (RADEON 9200 SE). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy. Card length: 183mm vs 168mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 60 vs 60.

FeatureGeForce3 Ti 200RADEON 9200 SE
TDP
215W
55W-74%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
Legacy
Length
183mm
168mm
Height
100mm
111mm
Slots
1
1
Temp (Load)
60
60
Perf/Watt
0.0
0.1
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce3 Ti 200 came in at $149, while the RADEON 9200 SE launched at $30. On MSRP, RADEON 9200 SE was 79.9% cheaper ($119 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.0 (GeForce3 Ti 200) vs 0.1 (RADEON 9200 SE) — the RADEON 9200 SE offers 100+% better value. The newer card here is RADEON 9200 SE (2025 vs 2018).

FeatureGeForce3 Ti 200RADEON 9200 SE
MSRP
$149
$30-80%
Performance per Dollar
0.0
0.1
Codename
TU104
Strix Halo
Release
September 20 2018
January 6 2025
Ranking
#94
#98
Search GeForce3 Ti 200 on AmazonSearch RADEON 9200 SE on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.