GeForce3 Ti 200 vs MOBILITY RADEON 9200

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce3 Ti 200 vs MOBILITY RADEON 9200 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce3 Ti 200 vs MOBILITY RADEON 9200: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce3 Ti 200

2018

Why buy it

✅+33.3% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅693.7% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 65 MB).
✅MOBILITY RADEON 9200 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GeForce3 Ti 200 is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

❌2018 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
❌
204.1% HIGHER MSRP
$149 MSRPvs$49 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.0 vs 0.1 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $49 MSRP).
❌330% higher power demand at 215W vs 50W.
❌18200% longer card at 183mm vs 1mm.

MOBILITY RADEON 9200

2010

Why buy it

✅Costs $100 less on MSRP ($49 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
✅Delivers 128.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.1 vs 0.0 G3D/$ ($49 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
✅Draws 50W instead of 215W, a 165W reduction.
✅Measures 1mm instead of 183mm, a 182mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (3 vs 4).
❌Less VRAM, with 65 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2010 hardware with 65 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce3 Ti 200 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 33.3% in PassMark G3D (4 vs 3), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce3 Ti 200 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 512 MB vs 65 MB of VRAM, a 12nm process instead of 40nm, 46 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2018 generation instead of 2010. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

MOBILITY RADEON 9200 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $100 cheaper on MSRP at $49 vs $149, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 128.1% (0.1 vs 0.0), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, MOBILITY RADEON 9200 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce3 Ti 200 has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce3 Ti 200 vs MOBILITY RADEON 9200 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce3 Ti 200

The GeForce3 Ti 200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 20 2018. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1515 MHz to 1710 MHz. It has 2944 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 215W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4 points. Launch price was $699.

MOBILITY RADEON 9200

The MOBILITY RADEON 9200 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce3 Ti 200 scores 4 versus the MOBILITY RADEON 9200's 3 — the GeForce3 Ti 200 leads by 33.3%. The GeForce3 Ti 200 is built on Turing while the MOBILITY RADEON 9200 uses TeraScale 2, both on 12 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 2,944 (GeForce3 Ti 200) vs 800 (MOBILITY RADEON 9200). Raw compute: 10.07 TFLOPS (GeForce3 Ti 200) vs 1.12 TFLOPS (MOBILITY RADEON 9200).

Feature	GeForce3 Ti 200	MOBILITY RADEON 9200
G3D Mark Score	4+33%	3
Architecture	Turing	TeraScale 2
Process Node	12 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	2944+268%	800
Compute (TFLOPS)	10.07 TFLOPS+799%	1.12 TFLOPS
ROPs	64+300%	16
TMUs	184+360%	40
L1 Cache	2.9 MB+3525%	0.08 MB
L2 Cache	4 MB+1500%	0.25 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce3 Ti 200 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The MOBILITY RADEON 9200 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce3 Ti 200	MOBILITY RADEON 9200
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce3 Ti 200 has 512 MB of VRAM, while the MOBILITY RADEON 9200 carries 65 MB. GeForce3 Ti 200 gives you 693.7% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce3 Ti 200 and 128-bit on the MOBILITY RADEON 9200. L2 Cache: 4 MB (GeForce3 Ti 200) vs 0.25 MB (MOBILITY RADEON 9200) — the GeForce3 Ti 200 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce3 Ti 200	MOBILITY RADEON 9200
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB+694%	0.063 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%
L2 Cache	4 MB+1500%	0.25 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 8.1 (GeForce3 Ti 200) vs 8.1 (MOBILITY RADEON 9200). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 0.

Feature	GeForce3 Ti 200	MOBILITY RADEON 9200
DirectX	8.1	8.1
Max Displays	2	0

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce3 Ti 200 draws 215W versus the MOBILITY RADEON 9200's 50W — a 124.5% difference. The MOBILITY RADEON 9200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce3 Ti 200) vs 350W (MOBILITY RADEON 9200). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 183mm vs 1mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots.

Feature	GeForce3 Ti 200	MOBILITY RADEON 9200
TDP	215W	50W-77%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	183mm	1mm
Height	100mm	—
Slots	1	0-100%
Temp (Load)	60	—
Perf/Watt	0.0	0.1

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce3 Ti 200 came in at $149, while the MOBILITY RADEON 9200 launched at $49. On MSRP, MOBILITY RADEON 9200 was 67.1% cheaper ($100 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.0 (GeForce3 Ti 200) vs 0.1 (MOBILITY RADEON 9200) — the MOBILITY RADEON 9200 offers 100+% better value. The newer card here is GeForce3 Ti 200 (2018 vs 2010).

Feature	GeForce3 Ti 200	MOBILITY RADEON 9200
MSRP	$149	$49-67%
Performance per Dollar	0.0	0.1
Codename	TU104	Broadway
Release	September 20 2018	January 7 2010
Ranking	#94	#846

Search GeForce3 Ti 200 on Amazon

Search MOBILITY RADEON 9200 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.