CPU
GPU
GeForce3 Ti 200
Popular choices:
MOBILITY RADEON 9200
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce3 Ti 200 is positioned at rank 382 and the MOBILITY RADEON 9200 is on rank 745, so the GeForce3 Ti 200 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce3 Ti 200
Performance Per Dollar MOBILITY RADEON 9200
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce3 Ti 200 is significantly newer (2018 vs 2010). The GeForce3 Ti 200 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The MOBILITY RADEON 9200 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce3 Ti 200 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 33.3% higher G3D Mark score and 693.7% more VRAM (512 MB vs 65 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the MOBILITY RADEON 9200.
| Insight | GeForce3 Ti 200 | MOBILITY RADEON 9200 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+33.3%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-33.3%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / Turing (2018−2022)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+693.7%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The MOBILITY RADEON 9200 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $15 versus $49 for the GeForce3 Ti 200, it costs 69% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 145% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce3 Ti 200 | MOBILITY RADEON 9200 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+145%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($49) | ✅More affordable ($15) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce3 Ti 200 and MOBILITY RADEON 9200
GeForce3 Ti 200
The GeForce3 Ti 200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 20 2018. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1515 MHz to 1710 MHz. It has 2944 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 215W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4 points. Launch price was $699.
MOBILITY RADEON 9200
The MOBILITY RADEON 9200 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce3 Ti 200 scores 4 versus the MOBILITY RADEON 9200's 3 — the GeForce3 Ti 200 leads by 33.3%. The GeForce3 Ti 200 is built on Turing while the MOBILITY RADEON 9200 uses TeraScale 2, both on 12 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 2,944 (GeForce3 Ti 200) vs 800 (MOBILITY RADEON 9200). Raw compute: 10.07 TFLOPS (GeForce3 Ti 200) vs 1.12 TFLOPS (MOBILITY RADEON 9200).
| Feature | GeForce3 Ti 200 | MOBILITY RADEON 9200 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4+33% | 3 |
| Architecture | Turing | TeraScale 2 |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 2944+268% | 800 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 10.07 TFLOPS+799% | 1.12 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 64+300% | 16 |
| TMUs | 184+360% | 40 |
| L1 Cache | 2.9 MB+3525% | 0.08 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+1500% | 0.25 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce3 Ti 200 | MOBILITY RADEON 9200 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce3 Ti 200 comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the MOBILITY RADEON 9200 has 65 MB. The GeForce3 Ti 200 offers 693.7% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (GeForce3 Ti 200) vs 0.25 MB (MOBILITY RADEON 9200) — the GeForce3 Ti 200 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce3 Ti 200 | MOBILITY RADEON 9200 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB+694% | 0.063 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+1500% | 0.25 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 8.1 (GeForce3 Ti 200) vs 8.1 (MOBILITY RADEON 9200). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 0.
| Feature | GeForce3 Ti 200 | MOBILITY RADEON 9200 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 0 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce3 Ti 200 draws 215W versus the MOBILITY RADEON 9200's 50W — a 124.5% difference. The MOBILITY RADEON 9200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce3 Ti 200) vs 350W (MOBILITY RADEON 9200). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 183mm vs 1mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | GeForce3 Ti 200 | MOBILITY RADEON 9200 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 215W | 50W-77% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 183mm | 1mm |
| Height | 100mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 60 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 0.0 | 0.1 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce3 Ti 200 launched at $149 MSRP and currently averages $49, while the MOBILITY RADEON 9200 launched at $49 and now averages $15. The MOBILITY RADEON 9200 costs 69.4% less ($34 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 0.1 (GeForce3 Ti 200) vs 0.2 (MOBILITY RADEON 9200) — the MOBILITY RADEON 9200 offers 100% better value. The GeForce3 Ti 200 is the newer GPU (2018 vs 2010).
| Feature | GeForce3 Ti 200 | MOBILITY RADEON 9200 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $149 | $49-67% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $49 | $15-69% |
| Performance per Dollar | 0.1 | 0.2+100% |
| Codename | TU104 | Broadway |
| Release | September 20 2018 | January 7 2010 |
| Ranking | #94 | #846 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce3 Ti 200 and MOBILITY RADEON 9200
