Chipversus Index
Jump to Section

GeForce3 Ti 200 vs MOBILITY/RADEON 9000

CPUCPUGPUGPU
NVIDIA

GeForce3 Ti 200

2018Core: 1515 MHzBoost: 1710 MHz
Similar parts
·······
Buy on Amazon
VS
AMD

MOBILITY/RADEON 9000

2010Core: 700 MHz
Similar parts
·······
Buy on Amazon

GeForce3 Ti 200 vs MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 Performance Spectrum

GeForce3 Ti 200
0.5 GB 215
4
0.0%
brand logoGeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB
brand logoGeForce GTX 780 Ti
brand logoGeForce RTX 4050 Mobile
brand logoGeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
brand logoRTX 4000 Ada Generation
brand logoGeForce RTX 5070
brand logoGeForce RTX 4080 SUPER
brand logoGeForce RTX 4090
MOBILITY/RADEON 9000
0.5 GB 10
4
0.0%
brand logoRADEON 7500
brand logoMOBILITY RADEON 9000
brand logoRadeon HD 7950 / R9 280
brand logoRadeon R9 Fury
brand logoRadeon RX 5700
brand logoRadeon RX 6700
brand logoRadeon RX 7800 XT
brand logoRadeon RX 7900 XT

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce3 Ti 200 vs MOBILITY/RADEON 9000: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce3 Ti 200

2018

Why buy it

  • ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • ✅MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GeForce3 Ti 200 is the less risky modern option long term.
  • ✅More future proof: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • ❌2018 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
  • ❌2050% higher power demand at 215W vs 10W.

MOBILITY/RADEON 9000

2010

Why buy it

  • ✅Draws 10W instead of 215W, a 205W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • ❌2010 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $149 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 0% in PassMark G3D (4 vs 4), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce3 Ti 200 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 12nm process instead of 40nm, 46 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2018 generation instead of 2010. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce3 Ti 200 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GeForce3 Ti 200 vs MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce3 Ti 200

The GeForce3 Ti 200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 20 2018. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1515 MHz to 1710 MHz. It has 2944 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 215W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4 points. Launch price was $699.

AMD

MOBILITY/RADEON 9000

The MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 10W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce3 Ti 200 scores 4 and the MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 reaches 4 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce3 Ti 200 is built on Turing while the MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 uses TeraScale 2, both on 12 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 2,944 (GeForce3 Ti 200) vs 800 (MOBILITY/RADEON 9000). Raw compute: 10.07 TFLOPS (GeForce3 Ti 200) vs 1.12 TFLOPS (MOBILITY/RADEON 9000).

FeatureGeForce3 Ti 200MOBILITY/RADEON 9000
G3D Mark Score
4
4
Architecture
Turing
TeraScale 2
Process Node
12 nm
40 nm
Shading Units
2944+268%
800
Compute (TFLOPS)
10.07 TFLOPS+799%
1.12 TFLOPS
ROPs
64+300%
16
TMUs
184+360%
40
L1 Cache
2.9 MB+3525%
0.08 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB+1500%
0.25 MB
✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce3 Ti 200 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce3 Ti 200MOBILITY/RADEON 9000
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce3 Ti 200 and 64-bit on the MOBILITY/RADEON 9000. L2 Cache: 4 MB (GeForce3 Ti 200) vs 0.25 MB (MOBILITY/RADEON 9000) — the GeForce3 Ti 200 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce3 Ti 200MOBILITY/RADEON 9000
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
64-bit
L2 Cache
4 MB+1500%
0.25 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 8.1 (GeForce3 Ti 200) vs 8.1 (MOBILITY/RADEON 9000). Vulkan: N/A vs N/A. OpenGL: 1.3 vs 1.4. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

FeatureGeForce3 Ti 200MOBILITY/RADEON 9000
DirectX
8.1
8.1
Vulkan
N/A
N/A
OpenGL
1.3
1.4+8%
Max Displays
2
2
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: None (GeForce3 Ti 200) vs N/A (MOBILITY/RADEON 9000). Decoder: None vs MPEG-2. Supported codecs: MPEG-2 (GeForce3 Ti 200) vs MPEG-2 (MOBILITY/RADEON 9000).

FeatureGeForce3 Ti 200MOBILITY/RADEON 9000
Encoder
None
N/A
Decoder
None
MPEG-2
Codecs
MPEG-2
MPEG-2
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce3 Ti 200 draws 215W versus the MOBILITY/RADEON 9000's 10W — a 182.2% difference. The MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce3 Ti 200) vs 0W (MOBILITY/RADEON 9000). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None. Card length: 183mm vs 0mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 60 vs 70.

FeatureGeForce3 Ti 200MOBILITY/RADEON 9000
TDP
215W
10W-95%
Recommended PSU
350W
0W-100%
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
None
Length
183mm
0mm
Height
100mm
0mm
Slots
1
0-100%
Temp (Load)
60-14%
70
Perf/Watt
0.0
0.4
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce3 Ti 200 came in at $149, while the MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 launched at $0. On MSRP, MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 was 100+% cheaper ($149 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.0 (GeForce3 Ti 200) vs Infinity (MOBILITY/RADEON 9000) — the MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 offers 100+% better value. The newer card here is GeForce3 Ti 200 (2018 vs 2010).

FeatureGeForce3 Ti 200MOBILITY/RADEON 9000
MSRP
$149
$0-100%
Performance per Dollar
0.0
Infinity
Codename
TU104
Broadway
Release
September 20 2018
January 7 2010
Ranking
#94
#846
Search GeForce3 Ti 200 on AmazonSearch MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.