GeForce3 Ti 200 vs GeForce4 440 Go 64M

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce3 Ti 200 vs GeForce4 440 Go 64M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce3 Ti 200 vs GeForce4 440 Go 64M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce3 Ti 200

2018

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅GeForce4 440 Go 64M is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GeForce3 Ti 200 is the less risky modern option long term.
✅More future proof: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (4 vs 6).
❌2018 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
❌571.9% higher power demand at 215W vs 32W.

GeForce4 440 Go 64M

2012

Why buy it

✅+50% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Draws 32W instead of 215W, a 183W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌2012 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $149 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce4 440 Go 64M is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 50% in PassMark G3D (6 vs 4), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce3 Ti 200 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 12nm process instead of 28nm, 46 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2018 generation instead of 2012. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce3 Ti 200 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. GeForce4 440 Go 64M still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GeForce3 Ti 200 vs GeForce4 440 Go 64M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce3 Ti 200

The GeForce3 Ti 200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 20 2018. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1515 MHz to 1710 MHz. It has 2944 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 215W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4 points. Launch price was $699.

GeForce4 440 Go 64M

The GeForce4 440 Go 64M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 1 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is Up to 710 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 32W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce3 Ti 200 scores 4 versus the GeForce4 440 Go 64M's 6 — the GeForce4 440 Go 64M leads by 50%. The GeForce3 Ti 200 is built on Turing while the GeForce4 440 Go 64M uses Kepler, both on 12 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 2,944 (GeForce3 Ti 200) vs 384 (GeForce4 440 Go 64M). Raw compute: 10.07 TFLOPS (GeForce3 Ti 200) vs 0.5445 TFLOPS (GeForce4 440 Go 64M).

Feature	GeForce3 Ti 200	GeForce4 440 Go 64M
G3D Mark Score	4	6+50%
Architecture	Turing	Kepler
Process Node	12 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	2944+667%	384
Compute (TFLOPS)	10.07 TFLOPS+1749%	0.5445 TFLOPS
ROPs	64+300%	16
TMUs	184+475%	32
L1 Cache	2.9 MB+9567%	0.03 MB
L2 Cache	4 MB+1500%	0.25 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce3 Ti 200	GeForce4 440 Go 64M
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce3 Ti 200 and 64-bit on the GeForce4 440 Go 64M. L2 Cache: 4 MB (GeForce3 Ti 200) vs 0.25 MB (GeForce4 440 Go 64M) — the GeForce3 Ti 200 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce3 Ti 200	GeForce4 440 Go 64M
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	4 MB+1500%	0.25 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 8.1 (GeForce3 Ti 200) vs 7.0 (GeForce4 440 Go 64M). Vulkan: N/A vs N/A. OpenGL: 1.3 vs 1.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

Feature	GeForce3 Ti 200	GeForce4 440 Go 64M
DirectX	8.1+16%	7.0
Vulkan	N/A	N/A
OpenGL	1.3	1.5+15%
Max Displays	2	2

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: None (GeForce3 Ti 200) vs None (GeForce4 440 Go 64M). Decoder: None vs MPEG-2 VPE. Supported codecs: MPEG-2 (GeForce3 Ti 200) vs MPEG-2 (GeForce4 440 Go 64M).

Feature	GeForce3 Ti 200	GeForce4 440 Go 64M
Encoder	None	None
Decoder	None	MPEG-2 VPE
Codecs	MPEG-2	MPEG-2

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce3 Ti 200 draws 215W versus the GeForce4 440 Go 64M's 32W — a 148.2% difference. The GeForce4 440 Go 64M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce3 Ti 200) vs 350W (GeForce4 440 Go 64M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 183mm vs 0mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 60 vs 85.

Feature	GeForce3 Ti 200	GeForce4 440 Go 64M
TDP	215W	32W-85%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	183mm	0mm
Height	100mm	0mm
Slots	1	0-100%
Temp (Load)	60-29%	85
Perf/Watt	0.0	0.2

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is GeForce3 Ti 200 (2018 vs 2012).

Feature	GeForce3 Ti 200	GeForce4 440 Go 64M
MSRP	$149	—
Codename	TU104	GK107
Release	September 20 2018	October 1 2012
Ranking	#94	#903

Search GeForce3 Ti 200 on Amazon

Search GeForce4 440 Go 64M on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.