GeForce3 Ti 200 vs GeForce4 MX 4000

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce3 Ti 200 vs GeForce4 MX 4000 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce3 Ti 200 vs GeForce4 MX 4000: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce3 Ti 200

2018

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (4 vs 5).
❌2018 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
❌760% higher power demand at 215W vs 25W.

GeForce4 MX 4000

2020

Why buy it

✅+25% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅GeForce3 Ti 200 is already legacy-tier future-proofing, so GeForce4 MX 4000 is the less risky modern option long term.
✅Draws 25W instead of 215W, a 190W reduction.
✅Measures 168mm instead of 183mm, a 15mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌2020 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $149 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce4 MX 4000 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 25% in PassMark G3D (5 vs 4), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce4 MX 4000 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a newer 2020 generation instead of 2018. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce3 Ti 200 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, GeForce3 Ti 200 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce4 MX 4000 has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce3 Ti 200 vs GeForce4 MX 4000 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce3 Ti 200

The GeForce3 Ti 200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 20 2018. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1515 MHz to 1710 MHz. It has 2944 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 215W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4 points. Launch price was $699.

GeForce4 MX 4000

The GeForce4 MX 4000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 1 2020. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1395 MHz to 1575 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce3 Ti 200 scores 4 versus the GeForce4 MX 4000's 5 — the GeForce4 MX 4000 leads by 25%. The GeForce3 Ti 200 is built on Turing while the GeForce4 MX 4000 uses Turing, both on a 12 nm process. Shader units: 2,944 (GeForce3 Ti 200) vs 896 (GeForce4 MX 4000). Raw compute: 10.07 TFLOPS (GeForce3 Ti 200) vs 3.226 TFLOPS (GeForce4 MX 4000). Boost clocks: 1710 MHz vs 1575 MHz.

Feature	GeForce3 Ti 200	GeForce4 MX 4000
G3D Mark Score	4	5+25%
Architecture	Turing	Turing
Process Node	12 nm	12 nm
Shading Units	2944+229%	896
Compute (TFLOPS)	10.07 TFLOPS+212%	3.226 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1710 MHz+9%	1575 MHz
ROPs	64+100%	32
TMUs	184+188%	64

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce3 Ti 200	GeForce4 MX 4000
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce3 Ti 200 and 64-bit on the GeForce4 MX 4000.

Feature	GeForce3 Ti 200	GeForce4 MX 4000
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 8.1 (GeForce3 Ti 200) vs 7.0 (GeForce4 MX 4000). OpenGL: 1.3 vs 1.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

Feature	GeForce3 Ti 200	GeForce4 MX 4000
DirectX	8.1+16%	7.0
OpenGL	1.3	1.5+15%
Max Displays	2	2

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: None (GeForce3 Ti 200) vs None (GeForce4 MX 4000). Decoder: None vs MPEG-2 Decoder. Supported codecs: MPEG-2 (GeForce3 Ti 200) vs MPEG-2 (GeForce4 MX 4000).

Feature	GeForce3 Ti 200	GeForce4 MX 4000
Encoder	None	None
Decoder	None	MPEG-2 Decoder
Codecs	MPEG-2	MPEG-2

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce3 Ti 200 draws 215W versus the GeForce4 MX 4000's 25W — a 158.3% difference. The GeForce4 MX 4000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce3 Ti 200) vs 350W (GeForce4 MX 4000). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 183mm vs 168mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 60 vs 60°C.

Feature	GeForce3 Ti 200	GeForce4 MX 4000
TDP	215W	25W-88%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	183mm	168mm
Height	100mm	100mm
Slots	1	1
Temp (Load)	60	60°C
Perf/Watt	0.0	0.2

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce3 Ti 200 came in at $149, while the GeForce4 MX 4000 launched at $0. On MSRP, GeForce4 MX 4000 was 100+% cheaper ($149 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.0 (GeForce3 Ti 200) vs Infinity (GeForce4 MX 4000) — the GeForce4 MX 4000 offers 100+% better value. The newer card here is GeForce4 MX 4000 (2020 vs 2018).

Feature	GeForce3 Ti 200	GeForce4 MX 4000
MSRP	$149	$0-100%
Performance per Dollar	0.0	Infinity
Codename	TU104	N17S-G5 / GP107-670-A1
Release	September 20 2018	August 1 2020
Ranking	#94	#523

Search GeForce3 Ti 200 on Amazon

Search GeForce4 MX 4000 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.