
GeForce3 Ti 200

GeForce4 MX 420
GeForce3 Ti 200 vs GeForce4 MX 420 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce3 Ti 200 vs GeForce4 MX 420 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce3 Ti 200 vs GeForce4 MX 420: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce3 Ti 200
2018Why buy it
- ✅693.7% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 65 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (4 vs 5).
- ❌2018 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
- ❌50.5% HIGHER MSRP$149 MSRPvs$99 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.0 vs 0.1 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $99 MSRP).
- ❌760% higher power demand at 215W vs 25W.
GeForce4 MX 420
2020Why buy it
- ✅+25% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $50 less on MSRP ($99 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 88.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.1 vs 0.0 G3D/$ ($99 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
- ✅GeForce3 Ti 200 is already legacy-tier future-proofing, so GeForce4 MX 420 is the less risky modern option long term.
- ✅Draws 25W instead of 215W, a 190W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 65 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2020 hardware with 65 MB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce3 Ti 200 vs GeForce4 MX 420 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce3 Ti 200
The GeForce3 Ti 200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 20 2018. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1515 MHz to 1710 MHz. It has 2944 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 215W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4 points. Launch price was $699.

GeForce4 MX 420
The GeForce4 MX 420 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 1 2020. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1395 MHz to 1575 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce3 Ti 200 scores 4 versus the GeForce4 MX 420's 5 — the GeForce4 MX 420 leads by 25%. The GeForce3 Ti 200 is built on Turing while the GeForce4 MX 420 uses Turing, both on a 12 nm process. Shader units: 2,944 (GeForce3 Ti 200) vs 896 (GeForce4 MX 420). Raw compute: 10.07 TFLOPS (GeForce3 Ti 200) vs 3.226 TFLOPS (GeForce4 MX 420). Boost clocks: 1710 MHz vs 1575 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce3 Ti 200 | GeForce4 MX 420 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4 | 5+25% |
| Architecture | Turing | Turing |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 2944+229% | 896 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 10.07 TFLOPS+212% | 3.226 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1710 MHz+9% | 1575 MHz |
| ROPs | 64+100% | 32 |
| TMUs | 184+188% | 64 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce3 Ti 200 | GeForce4 MX 420 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce3 Ti 200 has 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce4 MX 420 carries 65 MB. GeForce3 Ti 200 gives you 693.7% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce3 Ti 200 and 64-bit on the GeForce4 MX 420.
| Feature | GeForce3 Ti 200 | GeForce4 MX 420 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB+694% | 0.063 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 8.1 (GeForce3 Ti 200) vs 7.0 (GeForce4 MX 420). OpenGL: 1.3 vs 1.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce3 Ti 200 | GeForce4 MX 420 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 8.1+16% | 7.0 |
| OpenGL | 1.3 | 1.5+15% |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (GeForce3 Ti 200) vs None (GeForce4 MX 420). Decoder: None vs MPEG-2 Decoder. Supported codecs: MPEG-2 (GeForce3 Ti 200) vs MPEG-2 (GeForce4 MX 420).
| Feature | GeForce3 Ti 200 | GeForce4 MX 420 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | None |
| Decoder | None | MPEG-2 Decoder |
| Codecs | MPEG-2 | MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce3 Ti 200 draws 215W versus the GeForce4 MX 420's 25W — a 158.3% difference. The GeForce4 MX 420 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce3 Ti 200) vs 350W (GeForce4 MX 420). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 60 vs 60°C.
| Feature | GeForce3 Ti 200 | GeForce4 MX 420 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 215W | 25W-88% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 183mm | — |
| Height | 100mm | 100mm |
| Slots | 1 | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 60 | 60°C |
| Perf/Watt | 0.0 | 0.2 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce3 Ti 200 came in at $149, while the GeForce4 MX 420 launched at $99. On MSRP, GeForce4 MX 420 was 33.6% cheaper ($50 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.0 (GeForce3 Ti 200) vs 0.1 (GeForce4 MX 420) — the GeForce4 MX 420 offers 100+% better value. The newer card here is GeForce4 MX 420 (2020 vs 2018).
| Feature | GeForce3 Ti 200 | GeForce4 MX 420 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $149 | $99-34% |
| Performance per Dollar | 0.0 | 0.1 |
| Codename | TU104 | N17S-G5 / GP107-670-A1 |
| Release | September 20 2018 | August 1 2020 |
| Ranking | #94 | #523 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














