
GeForce 256

GeForce3 Ti 200
GeForce 256 vs GeForce3 Ti 200 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce 256 vs GeForce3 Ti 200 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce 256 vs GeForce3 Ti 200: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce 256
2019Why buy it
- ✅+25% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅GeForce3 Ti 200 is already legacy-tier future-proofing, so GeForce 256 is the less risky modern option long term.
- ✅Draws 10W instead of 215W, a 205W reduction.
- ✅Measures 165mm instead of 183mm, a 18mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌2019 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
- ❌33.6% HIGHER MSRP$199 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
GeForce3 Ti 200
2018Why buy it
- ✅Costs $50 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (4 vs 5).
- ❌2018 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
- ❌2050% higher power demand at 215W vs 10W.
- ❌10.9% longer card at 183mm vs 165mm.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce 256 vs GeForce3 Ti 200 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce 256
The GeForce 256 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 20 2019. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 937 MHz to 1038 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 10W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5 points.

GeForce3 Ti 200
The GeForce3 Ti 200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 20 2018. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1515 MHz to 1710 MHz. It has 2944 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 215W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4 points. Launch price was $699.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce 256 scores 5 versus the GeForce3 Ti 200's 4 — the GeForce 256 leads by 25%. The GeForce 256 is built on Pascal while the GeForce3 Ti 200 uses Turing, both on 14 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 256) vs 2,944 (GeForce3 Ti 200). Raw compute: 0.7972 TFLOPS (GeForce 256) vs 10.07 TFLOPS (GeForce3 Ti 200). Boost clocks: 1038 MHz vs 1710 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce 256 | GeForce3 Ti 200 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5+25% | 4 |
| Architecture | Pascal | Turing |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 2944+667% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.7972 TFLOPS | 10.07 TFLOPS+1163% |
| Boost Clock | 1038 MHz | 1710 MHz+65% |
| ROPs | 16 | 64+300% |
| TMUs | 24 | 184+667% |
| L1 Cache | 0.14 MB | 2.9 MB+1971% |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 4 MB+700% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce 256 | GeForce3 Ti 200 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 256 and 64-bit on the GeForce3 Ti 200. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (GeForce 256) vs 4 MB (GeForce3 Ti 200) — the GeForce3 Ti 200 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce 256 | GeForce3 Ti 200 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 4 MB+700% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 7.0 (GeForce 256) vs 8.1 (GeForce3 Ti 200). OpenGL: 1.2 vs 1.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce 256 | GeForce3 Ti 200 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 7.0 | 8.1+16% |
| OpenGL | 1.2 | 1.3+8% |
| Max Displays | 1 | 2+100% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (GeForce 256) vs None (GeForce3 Ti 200). Decoder: MPEG-2 Motion Comp vs None. Supported codecs: MPEG-2 (GeForce 256) vs MPEG-2 (GeForce3 Ti 200).
| Feature | GeForce 256 | GeForce3 Ti 200 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | None |
| Decoder | MPEG-2 Motion Comp | None |
| Codecs | MPEG-2 | MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 256 draws 10W versus the GeForce3 Ti 200's 215W — a 182.2% difference. The GeForce 256 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 256) vs 350W (GeForce3 Ti 200). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 165mm vs 183mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 60°C vs 60.
| Feature | GeForce 256 | GeForce3 Ti 200 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 10W-95% | 215W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 165mm | 183mm |
| Height | 100mm | 100mm |
| Slots | 1 | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 60°C | 60 |
| Perf/Watt | 0.5 | 0.0 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce 256 came in at $199, while the GeForce3 Ti 200 launched at $149. On MSRP, GeForce3 Ti 200 was 25.1% cheaper ($50 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.0 (GeForce 256) vs 0.0 (GeForce3 Ti 200) — the GeForce3 Ti 200 offers 0% better value. The newer card here is GeForce 256 (2019 vs 2018).
| Feature | GeForce 256 | GeForce3 Ti 200 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $199 | $149-25% |
| Performance per Dollar | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Codename | GP108B | TU104 |
| Release | February 20 2019 | September 20 2018 |
| Ranking | #643 | #94 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














