CPU
GPU
MOBILITY RADEON 7500
Popular choices:
RADEON 7200
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The MOBILITY RADEON 7500 is positioned at rank 744 and the RADEON 7200 is on rank 750, so the MOBILITY RADEON 7500 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar MOBILITY RADEON 7500
Performance Per Dollar RADEON 7200
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The RADEON 7200 is significantly newer (2019 vs 2010). The RADEON 7200 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The MOBILITY RADEON 7500 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The MOBILITY RADEON 7500 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 33.3% higher G3D Mark score. However, the RADEON 7200 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | MOBILITY RADEON 7500 | RADEON 7200 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+33.3%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-33.3%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)) | GCN 3.0 (2014−2019) (28nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+693.7%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The MOBILITY RADEON 7500 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $15 versus $45 for the RADEON 7200, it costs 67% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 300% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | MOBILITY RADEON 7500 | RADEON 7200 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+300%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($15) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($45) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of MOBILITY RADEON 7500 and RADEON 7200
MOBILITY RADEON 7500
The MOBILITY RADEON 7500 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4 points.
RADEON 7200
The RADEON 7200 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 13 2019. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 730 MHz to 1024 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the MOBILITY RADEON 7500 scores 4 versus the RADEON 7200's 3 — the MOBILITY RADEON 7500 leads by 33.3%. The MOBILITY RADEON 7500 is built on TeraScale 2 while the RADEON 7200 uses GCN 3.0, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 800 (MOBILITY RADEON 7500) vs 384 (RADEON 7200). Raw compute: 1.12 TFLOPS (MOBILITY RADEON 7500) vs 0.7864 TFLOPS (RADEON 7200).
| Feature | MOBILITY RADEON 7500 | RADEON 7200 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4+33% | 3 |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | GCN 3.0 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 800+108% | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.12 TFLOPS+42% | 0.7864 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 16+100% | 8 |
| TMUs | 40+67% | 24 |
| L1 Cache | 80 KB | 96 KB+20% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB+100% | 128 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | MOBILITY RADEON 7500 | RADEON 7200 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The MOBILITY RADEON 7500 comes with 65 MB of VRAM, while the RADEON 7200 has 512 MB. The RADEON 7200 offers 693.7% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 256 KB (MOBILITY RADEON 7500) vs 128 KB (RADEON 7200) — the MOBILITY RADEON 7500 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | MOBILITY RADEON 7500 | RADEON 7200 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.063 GB | 0.5 GB+694% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB+100% | 128 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 7.0 (MOBILITY RADEON 7500) vs 7.0 (RADEON 7200). OpenGL: 1.3 vs 1.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 1.
| Feature | MOBILITY RADEON 7500 | RADEON 7200 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 7.0 | 7.0 |
| OpenGL | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| Max Displays | 2+100% | 1 |
Power & Dimensions
The MOBILITY RADEON 7500 draws 50W versus the RADEON 7200's 50W — a 0% difference. The RADEON 7200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (MOBILITY RADEON 7500) vs 350W (RADEON 7200). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 70.
| Feature | MOBILITY RADEON 7500 | RADEON 7200 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W | 50W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Legacy |
| Length | — | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | — | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C | 70 |
| Perf/Watt | 0.1 | 0.1 |
Value Analysis
The MOBILITY RADEON 7500 launched at $49 MSRP and currently averages $15, while the RADEON 7200 launched at $99 and now averages $45. The MOBILITY RADEON 7500 costs 66.7% less ($30 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 0.3 (MOBILITY RADEON 7500) vs 0.1 (RADEON 7200) — the MOBILITY RADEON 7500 offers 200% better value. The RADEON 7200 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2010).
| Feature | MOBILITY RADEON 7500 | RADEON 7200 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $49-51% | $99 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $15-67% | $45 |
| Performance per Dollar | 0.3+200% | 0.1 |
| Codename | Broadway | Polaris 24 |
| Release | January 7 2010 | May 13 2019 |
| Ranking | #846 | #898 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on MOBILITY RADEON 7500 and RADEON 7200
