GeForce4 Ti 4800 vs MOBILITY RADEON 7500 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce4 Ti 4800 vs MOBILITY RADEON 7500 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
GeForce4 Ti 4800 vs MOBILITY RADEON 7500: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce4 Ti 4800
2010Why buy it
- ✅+50% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅693.7% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 65 MB).
- ✅More future proof: Fermi (2010−2014) on 40nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌2010 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌714.3% HIGHER MSRP$399 MSRPvs$49 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.0 vs 0.1 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $49 MSRP).
- ❌400% higher power demand at 250W vs 50W.
MOBILITY RADEON 7500
2010Why buy it
- ✅Costs $350 less on MSRP ($49 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 442.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.1 vs 0.0 G3D/$ ($49 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 250W, a 200W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (4 vs 6).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 65 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2010 hardware with 65 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce4 Ti 4800 vs MOBILITY RADEON 7500 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce4 Ti 4800
The GeForce4 Ti 4800 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 26 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6 points. Launch price was $499.

MOBILITY RADEON 7500
The MOBILITY RADEON 7500 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce4 Ti 4800 scores 6 versus the MOBILITY RADEON 7500's 4 — the GeForce4 Ti 4800 leads by 50%. The GeForce4 Ti 4800 is built on Fermi while the MOBILITY RADEON 7500 uses TeraScale 2, both on a 40 nm process. Shader units: 480 (GeForce4 Ti 4800) vs 800 (MOBILITY RADEON 7500). Raw compute: 1.345 TFLOPS (GeForce4 Ti 4800) vs 1.12 TFLOPS (MOBILITY RADEON 7500).
| Feature | GeForce4 Ti 4800 | MOBILITY RADEON 7500 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6+50% | 4 |
| Architecture | Fermi | TeraScale 2 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 480 | 800+67% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.345 TFLOPS+20% | 1.12 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 48+200% | 16 |
| TMUs | 60+50% | 40 |
| L1 Cache | 960 KB+1100% | 80 KB |
| L2 Cache | 768 KB+200% | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce4 Ti 4800 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The MOBILITY RADEON 7500 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce4 Ti 4800 | MOBILITY RADEON 7500 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce4 Ti 4800 has 512 MB of VRAM, while the MOBILITY RADEON 7500 carries 65 MB. GeForce4 Ti 4800 gives you 693.7% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce4 Ti 4800 and 128-bit on the MOBILITY RADEON 7500. L2 Cache: 768 KB (GeForce4 Ti 4800) vs 256 KB (MOBILITY RADEON 7500) — the GeForce4 Ti 4800 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce4 Ti 4800 | MOBILITY RADEON 7500 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB+694% | 0.063 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 768 KB+200% | 256 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 8.1 (GeForce4 Ti 4800) vs 7.0 (MOBILITY RADEON 7500). OpenGL: 1.3 vs 1.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce4 Ti 4800 | MOBILITY RADEON 7500 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 8.1+16% | 7.0 |
| OpenGL | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce4 Ti 4800 draws 250W versus the MOBILITY RADEON 7500's 50W — a 133.3% difference. The MOBILITY RADEON 7500 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce4 Ti 4800) vs 350W (MOBILITY RADEON 7500). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 65°C vs 70°C.
| Feature | GeForce4 Ti 4800 | MOBILITY RADEON 7500 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W | 50W-80% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 216mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 65°C-7% | 70°C |
| Perf/Watt | 0.0 | 0.1 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce4 Ti 4800 came in at $399, while the MOBILITY RADEON 7500 launched at $49. On MSRP, MOBILITY RADEON 7500 was 87.7% cheaper ($350 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.0 (GeForce4 Ti 4800) vs 0.1 (MOBILITY RADEON 7500) — the MOBILITY RADEON 7500 offers 100+% better value.
| Feature | GeForce4 Ti 4800 | MOBILITY RADEON 7500 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $399 | $49-88% |
| Performance per Dollar | 0.0 | 0.1 |
| Codename | GF100 | Broadway |
| Release | March 26 2010 | January 7 2010 |
| Ranking | #488 | #846 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















