GeForce4 MX 420 vs MOBILITY RADEON 7500

NVIDIA

GeForce4 MX 420

2020Core: 1395 MHzBoost: 1575 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

MOBILITY RADEON 7500

2010Core: 700 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce4 MX 420 vs MOBILITY RADEON 7500 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce4 MX 420 vs MOBILITY RADEON 7500: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce4 MX 420

2020

Why buy it

  • +25% higher PassMark G3D performance.
  • MOBILITY RADEON 7500 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GeForce4 MX 420 is the less risky modern option long term.
  • Draws 25W instead of 50W, a 25W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • 2020 hardware with 65 MB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
  • 102% HIGHER MSRP
    $99 MSRPvs$49 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.1 vs 0.1 G3D/$ ($99 MSRP vs $49 MSRP).

MOBILITY RADEON 7500

2010

Why buy it

  • Costs $50 less on MSRP ($49 MSRP vs $99 MSRP).
  • Delivers 61.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.1 vs 0.1 G3D/$ ($49 MSRP vs $99 MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark G3D performance (4 vs 5).
  • 2010 hardware with 65 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 100% higher power demand at 50W vs 25W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce4 MX 420 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 25% in PassMark G3D (5 vs 4), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce4 MX 420 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 12nm process instead of 40nm and a newer 2020 generation instead of 2010. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
MOBILITY RADEON 7500 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $50 cheaper on MSRP at $49 vs $99, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 61.6% (0.1 vs 0.1), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, MOBILITY RADEON 7500 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce4 MX 420 has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce4 MX 420 vs MOBILITY RADEON 7500 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce4 MX 420

The GeForce4 MX 420 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 1 2020. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1395 MHz to 1575 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5 points.

AMD

MOBILITY RADEON 7500

The MOBILITY RADEON 7500 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4 points.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce4 MX 420 scores 5 versus the MOBILITY RADEON 7500's 4 — the GeForce4 MX 420 leads by 25%. The GeForce4 MX 420 is built on Turing while the MOBILITY RADEON 7500 uses TeraScale 2, both on 12 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 896 (GeForce4 MX 420) vs 800 (MOBILITY RADEON 7500). Raw compute: 3.226 TFLOPS (GeForce4 MX 420) vs 1.12 TFLOPS (MOBILITY RADEON 7500).

FeatureGeForce4 MX 420MOBILITY RADEON 7500
G3D Mark Score
5+25%
4
Architecture
Turing
TeraScale 2
Process Node
12 nm
40 nm
Shading Units
896+12%
800
Compute (TFLOPS)
3.226 TFLOPS+188%
1.12 TFLOPS
ROPs
32+100%
16
TMUs
64+60%
40

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce4 MX 420 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The MOBILITY RADEON 7500 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce4 MX 420MOBILITY RADEON 7500
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 65 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce4 MX 420 and 128-bit on the MOBILITY RADEON 7500.

FeatureGeForce4 MX 420MOBILITY RADEON 7500
VRAM Capacity
0.063 GB
0.063 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
128-bit+100%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 7.0 (GeForce4 MX 420) vs 7.0 (MOBILITY RADEON 7500). OpenGL: 1.5 vs 1.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

FeatureGeForce4 MX 420MOBILITY RADEON 7500
DirectX
7.0
7.0
OpenGL
1.5+15%
1.3
Max Displays
2
2
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce4 MX 420 draws 25W versus the MOBILITY RADEON 7500's 50W — a 66.7% difference. The GeForce4 MX 420 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce4 MX 420) vs 350W (MOBILITY RADEON 7500). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 60°C vs 70°C.

FeatureGeForce4 MX 420MOBILITY RADEON 7500
TDP
25W-50%
50W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Height
100mm
Slots
1
Temp (Load)
60°C-14%
70°C
Perf/Watt
0.2+100%
0.1
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce4 MX 420 came in at $99, while the MOBILITY RADEON 7500 launched at $49. On MSRP, MOBILITY RADEON 7500 was 50.5% cheaper ($50 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.1 (GeForce4 MX 420) vs 0.1 (MOBILITY RADEON 7500) — the MOBILITY RADEON 7500 offers 0% better value. The newer card here is GeForce4 MX 420 (2020 vs 2010).

FeatureGeForce4 MX 420MOBILITY RADEON 7500
MSRP
$99
$49-51%
Performance per Dollar
0.1
0.1
Codename
N17S-G5 / GP107-670-A1
Broadway
Release
August 1 2020
January 7 2010
Ranking
#523
#846

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.