GeForce4 MX 420 vs RADEON 9200

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce4 MX 420 vs RADEON 9200 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce4 MX 420 vs RADEON 9200: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce4 MX 420

2020

Why buy it

✅+25% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Delivers 25% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.1 vs 0.0 G3D/$ ($99 MSRP vs $99 MSRP).
✅Draws 25W instead of 50W, a 25W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 65 MB vs 256 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2020 hardware with 65 MB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.

RADEON 9200

2019

Why buy it

✅296.8% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (256 MB vs 65 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (4 vs 5).
❌2019 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.0 vs 0.1 G3D/$ ($99 MSRP vs $99 MSRP).
❌100% higher power demand at 50W vs 25W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce4 MX 420 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 25% in PassMark G3D (5 vs 4), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce4 MX 420 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 12nm process instead of 28nm and a newer 2020 generation instead of 2019. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce4 MX 420 makes the most sense to buy today. It is priced the same on MSRP at $99 vs $99, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 25% (0.1 vs 0.0), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce4 MX 420 vs RADEON 9200 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce4 MX 420

The GeForce4 MX 420 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 1 2020. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1395 MHz to 1575 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5 points.

RADEON 9200

The RADEON 9200 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 13 2019. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 730 MHz to 1024 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce4 MX 420 scores 5 versus the RADEON 9200's 4 — the GeForce4 MX 420 leads by 25%. The GeForce4 MX 420 is built on Turing while the RADEON 9200 uses GCN 3.0, both on 12 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 896 (GeForce4 MX 420) vs 384 (RADEON 9200). Raw compute: 3.226 TFLOPS (GeForce4 MX 420) vs 0.7864 TFLOPS (RADEON 9200). Boost clocks: 1575 MHz vs 1024 MHz.

Feature	GeForce4 MX 420	RADEON 9200
G3D Mark Score	5+25%	4
Architecture	Turing	GCN 3.0
Process Node	12 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	896+133%	384
Compute (TFLOPS)	3.226 TFLOPS+310%	0.7864 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1575 MHz+54%	1024 MHz
ROPs	32+300%	8
TMUs	64+167%	24

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce4 MX 420 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The RADEON 9200 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce4 MX 420	RADEON 9200
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce4 MX 420 has 65 MB of VRAM, while the RADEON 9200 carries 256 MB. RADEON 9200 gives you 296.8% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce4 MX 420 and 64-bit on the RADEON 9200.

Feature	GeForce4 MX 420	RADEON 9200
VRAM Capacity	0.063 GB	0.25 GB+297%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce4 MX 420 draws 25W versus the RADEON 9200's 50W — a 66.7% difference. The GeForce4 MX 420 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce4 MX 420) vs 350W (RADEON 9200). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy.

Feature	GeForce4 MX 420	RADEON 9200
TDP	25W-50%	50W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	Legacy
Height	100mm	—
Slots	1	—
Temp (Load)	60°C	—
Perf/Watt	0.2+100%	0.1

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce4 MX 420 came in at $99, while the RADEON 9200 launched at $99. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.1 (GeForce4 MX 420) vs 0.0 (RADEON 9200) — the GeForce4 MX 420 offers 100+% better value. The newer card here is GeForce4 MX 420 (2020 vs 2019).

Feature	GeForce4 MX 420	RADEON 9200
MSRP	$99	$99
Performance per Dollar	0.1	0.0
Codename	N17S-G5 / GP107-670-A1	Polaris 24
Release	August 1 2020	May 13 2019
Ranking	#523	#898

Search GeForce4 MX 420 on Amazon

Search RADEON 9200 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.