GeForce4 440 Go 64M vs GeForce4 MX 420

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce4 440 Go 64M vs GeForce4 MX 420 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce4 440 Go 64M vs GeForce4 MX 420: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce4 440 Go 64M

2012

Why buy it

✅+20% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅693.7% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 65 MB).

Trade-offs

❌2012 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.1 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $99 MSRP).
❌28% higher power demand at 32W vs 25W.

GeForce4 MX 420

2020

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.1 vs 0 G3D/$ ($99 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅GeForce4 440 Go 64M is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GeForce4 MX 420 is the less risky modern option long term.
✅Draws 25W instead of 32W, a 7W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (5 vs 6).
❌Less VRAM, with 65 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2020 hardware with 65 MB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce4 440 Go 64M is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 20% in PassMark G3D (6 vs 5), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce4 MX 420 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 12nm process instead of 28nm and a newer 2020 generation instead of 2012. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce4 MX 420 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. GeForce4 440 Go 64M still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GeForce4 440 Go 64M vs GeForce4 MX 420 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce4 440 Go 64M

The GeForce4 440 Go 64M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 1 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is Up to 710 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 32W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6 points.

GeForce4 MX 420

The GeForce4 MX 420 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 1 2020. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1395 MHz to 1575 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce4 440 Go 64M scores 6 versus the GeForce4 MX 420's 5 — the GeForce4 440 Go 64M leads by 20%. The GeForce4 440 Go 64M is built on Kepler while the GeForce4 MX 420 uses Turing, both on 28 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce4 440 Go 64M) vs 896 (GeForce4 MX 420). Raw compute: 0.5445 TFLOPS (GeForce4 440 Go 64M) vs 3.226 TFLOPS (GeForce4 MX 420).

Feature	GeForce4 440 Go 64M	GeForce4 MX 420
G3D Mark Score	6+20%	5
Architecture	Kepler	Turing
Process Node	28 nm	12 nm
Shading Units	384	896+133%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.5445 TFLOPS	3.226 TFLOPS+492%
ROPs	16	32+100%
TMUs	32	64+100%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce4 440 Go 64M	GeForce4 MX 420
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce4 440 Go 64M has 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce4 MX 420 carries 65 MB. GeForce4 440 Go 64M gives you 693.7% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce4 440 Go 64M and 64-bit on the GeForce4 MX 420.

Feature	GeForce4 440 Go 64M	GeForce4 MX 420
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB+694%	0.063 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 7.0 (GeForce4 440 Go 64M) vs 7.0 (GeForce4 MX 420). OpenGL: 1.5 vs 1.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

Feature	GeForce4 440 Go 64M	GeForce4 MX 420
DirectX	7.0	7.0
OpenGL	1.5	1.5
Max Displays	2	2

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: None (GeForce4 440 Go 64M) vs None (GeForce4 MX 420). Decoder: MPEG-2 VPE vs MPEG-2 Decoder. Supported codecs: MPEG-2 (GeForce4 440 Go 64M) vs MPEG-2 (GeForce4 MX 420).

Feature	GeForce4 440 Go 64M	GeForce4 MX 420
Encoder	None	None
Decoder	MPEG-2 VPE	MPEG-2 Decoder
Codecs	MPEG-2	MPEG-2

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce4 440 Go 64M draws 32W versus the GeForce4 MX 420's 25W — a 24.6% difference. The GeForce4 MX 420 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce4 440 Go 64M) vs 350W (GeForce4 MX 420). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 85 vs 60°C.

Feature	GeForce4 440 Go 64M	GeForce4 MX 420
TDP	32W	25W-22%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	0mm	—
Height	0mm	100mm
Slots	0-100%	1
Temp (Load)	85	60°C-29%
Perf/Watt	0.2	0.2

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is GeForce4 MX 420 (2020 vs 2012).

Feature	GeForce4 440 Go 64M	GeForce4 MX 420
MSRP	—	$99
Codename	GK107	N17S-G5 / GP107-670-A1
Release	October 1 2012	August 1 2020
Ranking	#903	#523

Search GeForce4 440 Go 64M on Amazon

Search GeForce4 MX 420 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.