GeForce FX Go 5200 vs GeForce4 440 Go 64M

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce FX Go 5200 vs GeForce4 440 Go 64M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce FX Go 5200 vs GeForce4 440 Go 64M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce FX Go 5200

2025

Why buy it

✅+33.3% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Better long-term bet: Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
✅More future proof: Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 32 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌1696.9% higher power demand at 575W vs 32W.

GeForce4 440 Go 64M

2012

Why buy it

✅1512.9% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 32 MB).
✅Draws 32W instead of 575W, a 543W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (6 vs 8).
❌2012 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce FX Go 5200 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 33.3% in PassMark G3D (8 vs 6), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce FX Go 5200 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 5nm process instead of 28nm, 170 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2025 generation instead of 2012. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce FX Go 5200 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

GeForce FX Go 5200 vs GeForce4 440 Go 64M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce FX Go 5200

The GeForce FX Go 5200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 30 2025. It features the Rankine architecture. The core clock ranges from 2017 MHz to 2407 MHz. It has 21760 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 575W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 170 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8 points. Launch price was $1,999.

GeForce4 440 Go 64M

The GeForce4 440 Go 64M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 1 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is Up to 710 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 32W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce FX Go 5200 scores 8 versus the GeForce4 440 Go 64M's 6 — the GeForce FX Go 5200 leads by 33.3%. The GeForce FX Go 5200 is built on Rankine while the GeForce4 440 Go 64M uses Kepler, both on 5 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 21,760 (GeForce FX Go 5200) vs 384 (GeForce4 440 Go 64M). Raw compute: 104.8 TFLOPS (GeForce FX Go 5200) vs 0.5445 TFLOPS (GeForce4 440 Go 64M).

Feature	GeForce FX Go 5200	GeForce4 440 Go 64M
G3D Mark Score	8+33%	6
Architecture	Rankine	Kepler
Process Node	5 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	21760+5567%	384
Compute (TFLOPS)	104.8 TFLOPS+19147%	0.5445 TFLOPS
ROPs	176+1000%	16
TMUs	680+2025%	32
L1 Cache	21.3 MB+70900%	0.03 MB
L2 Cache	96 MB+38300%	0.25 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce FX Go 5200	GeForce4 440 Go 64M
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce FX Go 5200 has 32 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce4 440 Go 64M carries 512 MB. GeForce4 440 Go 64M gives you 1512.9% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce FX Go 5200 and 64-bit on the GeForce4 440 Go 64M. L2 Cache: 96 MB (GeForce FX Go 5200) vs 0.25 MB (GeForce4 440 Go 64M) — the GeForce FX Go 5200 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce FX Go 5200	GeForce4 440 Go 64M
VRAM Capacity	0.031 GB	0.5 GB+1513%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	96 MB+38300%	0.25 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 9.0a (GeForce FX Go 5200) vs 7.0 (GeForce4 440 Go 64M). Vulkan: None vs N/A. OpenGL: 1.5 vs 1.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

Feature	GeForce FX Go 5200	GeForce4 440 Go 64M
DirectX	9.0a+29%	7.0
Vulkan	None	N/A
OpenGL	1.5	1.5
Max Displays	2	2

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: No (GeForce FX Go 5200) vs None (GeForce4 440 Go 64M). Decoder: No vs MPEG-2 VPE. Supported codecs: MPEG-2 (GeForce FX Go 5200) vs MPEG-2 (GeForce4 440 Go 64M).

Feature	GeForce FX Go 5200	GeForce4 440 Go 64M
Encoder	No	None
Decoder	No	MPEG-2 VPE
Codecs	MPEG-2	MPEG-2

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce FX Go 5200 draws 575W versus the GeForce4 440 Go 64M's 32W — a 178.9% difference. The GeForce4 440 Go 64M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce FX Go 5200) vs 350W (GeForce4 440 Go 64M). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 85.