GeForce4 440 Go 64M vs GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce4 440 Go 64M vs GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce4 440 Go 64M vs GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce4 440 Go 64M

2012

Why buy it

✅Draws 32W instead of 150W, a 118W reduction.
✅More future proof: Kepler (2012−2018) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (6 vs 7).
❌2012 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $299 MSRP).

GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE

2010

Why buy it

✅+16.7% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌2010 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌368.8% higher power demand at 150W vs 32W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 16.7% in PassMark G3D (7 vs 6), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce4 440 Go 64M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 28nm process instead of 40nm and a newer 2012 generation instead of 2010. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce4 440 Go 64M has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce4 440 Go 64M vs GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce4 440 Go 64M

The GeForce4 440 Go 64M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 1 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is Up to 710 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 32W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6 points.

GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE

The GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 15 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 650 MHz. It has 288 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7 points. Launch price was $160.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce4 440 Go 64M scores 6 versus the GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE's 7 — the GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE leads by 16.7%. The GeForce4 440 Go 64M is built on Kepler while the GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE uses Fermi, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce4 440 Go 64M) vs 288 (GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE). Raw compute: 0.5445 TFLOPS (GeForce4 440 Go 64M) vs 0.7488 TFLOPS (GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE).

Feature	GeForce4 440 Go 64M	GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE
G3D Mark Score	6	7+17%
Architecture	Kepler	Fermi
Process Node	28 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	384+33%	288
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.5445 TFLOPS	0.7488 TFLOPS+38%
ROPs	16	32+100%
TMUs	32	48+50%
L1 Cache	32 KB	384 KB+1100%
L2 Cache	256 KB	512 KB+100%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce4 440 Go 64M	GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce4 440 Go 64M and 64-bit on the GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE. L2 Cache: 256 KB (GeForce4 440 Go 64M) vs 512 KB (GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE) — the GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce4 440 Go 64M	GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	256 KB	512 KB+100%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 7.0 (GeForce4 440 Go 64M) vs 8.1 (GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE). Vulkan: N/A vs None. OpenGL: 1.5 vs 1.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

Feature	GeForce4 440 Go 64M	GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE
DirectX	7.0	8.1+16%
Vulkan	N/A	None
OpenGL	1.5+15%	1.3
Max Displays	2	2

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: None (GeForce4 440 Go 64M) vs No (GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE). Decoder: MPEG-2 VPE vs No.

Feature	GeForce4 440 Go 64M	GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE
Encoder	None	No
Decoder	MPEG-2 VPE	No
Codecs	MPEG-2

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce4 440 Go 64M draws 32W versus the GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE's 150W — a 129.7% difference. The GeForce4 440 Go 64M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce4 440 Go 64M) vs 350W (GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 216mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 85 vs 65°C.

Feature	GeForce4 440 Go 64M	GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE
TDP	32W-79%	150W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	0mm	216mm
Height	0mm	111mm
Slots	0-100%	1
Temp (Load)	85	65°C-24%
Perf/Watt	0.2	0.0

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is GeForce4 440 Go 64M (2012 vs 2010).

Feature	GeForce4 440 Go 64M	GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE
MSRP	—	$299
Codename	GK107	GF104
Release	October 1 2012	November 15 2010
Ranking	#903	#683

Search GeForce4 440 Go 64M on Amazon

Search GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.