GeForce4 440 Go 64M vs GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce4 440 Go 64M is positioned at rank 741 and the GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE is on rank 384, so the GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce4 440 Go 64M

#731

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

90475%

#733

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

82017%

#734

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

81800%

#738

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

74383%

#739

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

73875%

#741

GeForce4 440 Go 64M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

#742

RADEON 9000

MSRP: $49|Avg: $20

83%

#743

RADEON 9200 SE

MSRP: $30|Avg: $15

83%

#744

MOBILITY RADEON 7500

MSRP: $49|Avg: $15

67%

#745

MOBILITY RADEON 9000

MSRP: $50|Avg: $5

50%

#746

MOBILITY RADEON 9200

MSRP: $49|Avg: $15

50%

#747

GeForce4 MX 420

MSRP: $99|Avg: $10

42%

#748

RADEON 9200

MSRP: $99|Avg: $25

33%

#749

RADEON 9250

MSRP: $79|Avg: $25

33%

#750

RADEON 7200

MSRP: $99|Avg: $45

25%

#751

GeForce4 MX 440

MSRP: $149|Avg: $49

25%

#752

GeForce 256

MSRP: $199|Avg: $20

25%

#753

GeForce2 MX/MX 400

MSRP: $129|Avg: $15

25%

#754

GeForce2 MX

MSRP: $129|Avg: $49

17%

#755

GeForce3

MSRP: $499|Avg: $49

8%

#756

GeForce4 440

MSRP: $469|Avg: $49

8%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE

#1

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

MSRP: $399|Avg: $280

362700%

#2

GeForce RTX 5060

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

348450%

#3

Radeon RX 5600 XT

MSRP: $279|Avg: $180

344400%

#4

Radeon RX 9060

MSRP: $249|Avg: $249

343800%

#5

GeForce RTX 5050

MSRP: $249|Avg: $249

343100%

#6

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

MSRP: $249|Avg: $150

341150%

#7

Arc A580

MSRP: $179|Avg: $179

336850%

#8

Radeon RX 9060 XT

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

335600%

#9

Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

332500%

#10

Radeon RX 7600

MSRP: $269|Avg: $250

331600%

#11

Radeon RX 6600

MSRP: $329|Avg: $180

327600%

#12

GeForce RTX 4060

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

326900%

#13

Arc B570

MSRP: $219|Avg: $219

321000%

#14

Arc B580

MSRP: $249|Avg: $249

320800%

#369

Radeon R5 430 OEM

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $13

400000%

#384

GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE

MSRP: $299|Avg: $30

100%

#385

GeForce4 Ti 4800

MSRP: $399|Avg: $40

100%

#386

GeForce4 MX 460

MSRP: $179|Avg: $15

100%

#387

GeForce4 Ti 4600

MSRP: $399|Avg: $40

100%

#388

GeForce4 Ti 4400

MSRP: $299|Avg: $49

100%

#389

RADEON 7500

MSRP: $199|Avg: $50

100%

#390

GeForce3 Ti 500

MSRP: $349|Avg: $49

50%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 16.7% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce4 440 Go 64M.

Insight	GeForce4 440 Go 64M	GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-16.7%)	✅Leading raw performance (+16.7%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / Kepler (2012−2018))	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / Fermi (2010−2014))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit	—	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce4 440 Go 64M Benchmark Check

GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce4 440 Go 64M and GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE

GeForce4 440 Go 64M

The GeForce4 440 Go 64M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 1 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is Up to 710 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 32W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6 points.

GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE

The GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 15 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 650 MHz. It has 288 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7 points. Launch price was $160.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce4 440 Go 64M scores 6 versus the GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE's 7 — the GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE leads by 16.7%. The GeForce4 440 Go 64M is built on Kepler while the GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE uses Fermi, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce4 440 Go 64M) vs 288 (GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE). Raw compute: 0.5445 TFLOPS (GeForce4 440 Go 64M) vs 0.7488 TFLOPS (GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE).

Feature	GeForce4 440 Go 64M	GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE
G3D Mark Score	6	7+17%
Architecture	Kepler	Fermi
Process Node	28 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	384+33%	288
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.5445 TFLOPS	0.7488 TFLOPS+38%
ROPs	16	32+100%
TMUs	32	48+50%
L1 Cache	32 KB	384 KB+1100%
L2 Cache	256 KB	512 KB+100%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce4 440 Go 64M	GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 256 KB (GeForce4 440 Go 64M) vs 512 KB (GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE) — the GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce4 440 Go 64M	GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	256 KB	512 KB+100%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 7.0 (GeForce4 440 Go 64M) vs 8.1 (GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE). Vulkan: N/A vs None. OpenGL: 1.5 vs 1.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

Feature	GeForce4 440 Go 64M	GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE
DirectX	7.0	8.1+16%
Vulkan	N/A	None
OpenGL	1.5+15%	1.3
Max Displays	2	2

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: None (GeForce4 440 Go 64M) vs No (GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE). Decoder: MPEG-2 VPE vs No.

Feature	GeForce4 440 Go 64M	GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE
Encoder	None	No
Decoder	MPEG-2 VPE	No
Codecs	MPEG-2

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce4 440 Go 64M draws 32W versus the GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE's 150W — a 129.7% difference. The GeForce4 440 Go 64M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce4 440 Go 64M) vs 350W (GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 216mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 85 vs 65°C.

Feature	GeForce4 440 Go 64M	GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE
TDP	32W-79%	150W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	0mm	216mm
Height	0mm	111mm
Slots	0-100%	1
Temp (Load)	85	65°C-24%
Perf/Watt	0.2	0.0