GeForce FX 5500
VS
GeForce4 440 Go 64M

GeForce FX 5500 vs GeForce4 440 Go 64M

NVIDIA

GeForce FX 5500

2021Core: 1065 MHzBoost: 1320 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce4 440 Go 64M

2012Core: Up to 710 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce FX 5500 is positioned at rank 736 and the GeForce4 440 Go 64M is on rank 741, so the GeForce FX 5500 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce FX 5500

#726
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
49350%
#728
44736%
#729
44618%
#733
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
40573%
#734
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
40295%
#736
GeForce FX 5500
MSRP: $37|Avg: $30
100%
#737
RADEON 9500
MSRP: $179|Avg: $30
91%
#738
MOBILITY RADEON 9800
MSRP: $229|Avg: $25
91%
#739
RADEON X850 XT
MSRP: $499|Avg: $50
73%
#740
RADEON 9800
MSRP: $399|Avg: $399
68%
#742
RADEON 9000
MSRP: $49|Avg: $20
45%
#743
RADEON 9200 SE
MSRP: $30|Avg: $15
45%
#744
MOBILITY RADEON 7500
MSRP: $49|Avg: $15
36%
#745
MOBILITY RADEON 9200
MSRP: $49|Avg: $15
27%
#746
MOBILITY RADEON 9000
MSRP: $50|Avg: $5
27%
#747
GeForce4 MX 420
MSRP: $99|Avg: $10
23%
#748
RADEON 9250
MSRP: $79|Avg: $25
18%
#749
RADEON 9200
MSRP: $99|Avg: $25
18%
#750
GeForce 256
MSRP: $199|Avg: $20
14%
#751
GeForce4 MX 440
MSRP: $149|Avg: $49
14%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce4 440 Go 64M

#731
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
90475%
#733
82017%
#734
81800%
#738
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
74383%
#739
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
73875%
#741
GeForce4 440 Go 64M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#742
RADEON 9000
MSRP: $49|Avg: $20
83%
#743
RADEON 9200 SE
MSRP: $30|Avg: $15
83%
#744
MOBILITY RADEON 7500
MSRP: $49|Avg: $15
67%
#745
MOBILITY RADEON 9000
MSRP: $50|Avg: $5
50%
#746
MOBILITY RADEON 9200
MSRP: $49|Avg: $15
50%
#747
GeForce4 MX 420
MSRP: $99|Avg: $10
42%
#748
RADEON 9200
MSRP: $99|Avg: $25
33%
#749
RADEON 9250
MSRP: $79|Avg: $25
33%
#750
RADEON 7200
MSRP: $99|Avg: $45
25%
#751
GeForce4 MX 440
MSRP: $149|Avg: $49
25%
#752
GeForce 256
MSRP: $199|Avg: $20
25%
#753
GeForce2 MX/MX 400
MSRP: $129|Avg: $15
25%
#754
GeForce2 MX
MSRP: $129|Avg: $49
17%
#755
GeForce3
MSRP: $499|Avg: $49
8%
#756
GeForce4 440
MSRP: $469|Avg: $49
8%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The GeForce FX 5500 is significantly newer (2021 vs 2012). The GeForce FX 5500 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce4 440 Go 64M lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce FX 5500 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 33.3% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce4 440 Go 64M offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

InsightGeForce FX 5500GeForce4 440 Go 64M
Performance
Leading raw performance (+33.3%)
Lower raw frame rates (-33.3%)
Longevity
Turing (2018−2022) (12nm)
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / Kepler (2012−2018))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+100%)
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce FX 5500 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce FX 5500 and GeForce4 440 Go 64M

NVIDIA

GeForce FX 5500

The GeForce FX 5500 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 17 2021. It features the Rankine architecture. The core clock ranges from 1065 MHz to 1320 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8 points.

NVIDIA

GeForce4 440 Go 64M

The GeForce4 440 Go 64M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 1 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is Up to 710 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 32W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6 points.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce FX 5500 scores 8 versus the GeForce4 440 Go 64M's 6 — the GeForce FX 5500 leads by 33.3%. The GeForce FX 5500 is built on Rankine while the GeForce4 440 Go 64M uses Kepler, both on 12 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (GeForce FX 5500) vs 384 (GeForce4 440 Go 64M). Raw compute: 2.703 TFLOPS (GeForce FX 5500) vs 0.5445 TFLOPS (GeForce4 440 Go 64M).

FeatureGeForce FX 5500GeForce4 440 Go 64M
G3D Mark Score
8+33%
6
Architecture
Rankine
Kepler
Process Node
12 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
1024+167%
384
Compute (TFLOPS)
2.703 TFLOPS+396%
0.5445 TFLOPS
ROPs
16
16
TMUs
32
32
L1 Cache
2 MB+6567%
0.03 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB+700%
0.25 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce FX 5500GeForce4 440 Go 64M
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce FX 5500 comes with 256 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce4 440 Go 64M has 512 MB. The GeForce4 440 Go 64M offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce FX 5500) vs 0.25 MB (GeForce4 440 Go 64M) — the GeForce FX 5500 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce FX 5500GeForce4 440 Go 64M
VRAM Capacity
0.25 GB
0.5 GB+100%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
128-bit+100%
64-bit
L2 Cache
2 MB+700%
0.25 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 9.0a (GeForce FX 5500) vs 7.0 (GeForce4 440 Go 64M). Vulkan: None vs N/A. OpenGL: 1.5 vs 1.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

FeatureGeForce FX 5500GeForce4 440 Go 64M
DirectX
9.0a+29%
7.0
Vulkan
None
N/A
OpenGL
1.5
1.5
Max Displays
2
2
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: No (GeForce FX 5500) vs None (GeForce4 440 Go 64M). Decoder: No vs MPEG-2 VPE.

FeatureGeForce FX 5500GeForce4 440 Go 64M
Encoder
No
None
Decoder
No
MPEG-2 VPE
Codecs
MPEG-2
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce FX 5500 draws 25W versus the GeForce4 440 Go 64M's 32W — a 24.6% difference. The GeForce FX 5500 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce FX 5500) vs 350W (GeForce4 440 Go 64M). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 171mm vs 0mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 85.

FeatureGeForce FX 5500GeForce4 440 Go 64M
TDP
25W-22%
32W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
Legacy
PCIe-powered
Length
171mm
0mm
Height
111mm
0mm
Slots
1
0-100%
Temp (Load)
70°C-18%
85
Perf/Watt
0.3+50%
0.2
💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce FX 5500 is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2012).

FeatureGeForce FX 5500GeForce4 440 Go 64M
MSRP
$37
Avg Price (30d)
$30
Codename
TU117S
GK107
Release
December 17 2021
October 1 2012
Ranking
#468
#903