
GeForce FX 5500

GeForce4 440 Go 64M
GeForce FX 5500 vs GeForce4 440 Go 64M Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce FX 5500 vs GeForce4 440 Go 64M FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce FX 5500 vs GeForce4 440 Go 64M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce FX 5500
2021Why buy it
- ✅+33.3% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.2 vs 0 G3D/$ ($37 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅GeForce4 440 Go 64M is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GeForce FX 5500 is the less risky modern option long term.
- ✅Draws 25W instead of 32W, a 7W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 256 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Older hardware, 256 MB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
GeForce4 440 Go 64M
2012Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 256 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (6 vs 8).
- ❌2012 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.2 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $37 MSRP).
- ❌28% higher power demand at 32W vs 25W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce FX 5500 vs GeForce4 440 Go 64M Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce FX 5500
The GeForce FX 5500 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 17 2021. It features the Rankine architecture. The core clock ranges from 1065 MHz to 1320 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8 points.

GeForce4 440 Go 64M
The GeForce4 440 Go 64M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 1 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is Up to 710 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 32W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce FX 5500 scores 8 versus the GeForce4 440 Go 64M's 6 — the GeForce FX 5500 leads by 33.3%. The GeForce FX 5500 is built on Rankine while the GeForce4 440 Go 64M uses Kepler, both on 12 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (GeForce FX 5500) vs 384 (GeForce4 440 Go 64M). Raw compute: 2.703 TFLOPS (GeForce FX 5500) vs 0.5445 TFLOPS (GeForce4 440 Go 64M).
| Feature | GeForce FX 5500 | GeForce4 440 Go 64M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 8+33% | 6 |
| Architecture | Rankine | Kepler |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1024+167% | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.703 TFLOPS+396% | 0.5445 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 32 | 32 |
| L1 Cache | 2 MB+6567% | 0.03 MB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+700% | 0.25 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce FX 5500 | GeForce4 440 Go 64M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce FX 5500 has 256 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce4 440 Go 64M carries 512 MB. GeForce4 440 Go 64M gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce FX 5500 and 64-bit on the GeForce4 440 Go 64M. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce FX 5500) vs 0.25 MB (GeForce4 440 Go 64M) — the GeForce FX 5500 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce FX 5500 | GeForce4 440 Go 64M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.25 GB | 0.5 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+700% | 0.25 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 9.0a (GeForce FX 5500) vs 7.0 (GeForce4 440 Go 64M). Vulkan: None vs N/A. OpenGL: 1.5 vs 1.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce FX 5500 | GeForce4 440 Go 64M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 9.0a+29% | 7.0 |
| Vulkan | None | N/A |
| OpenGL | 1.5 | 1.5 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: No (GeForce FX 5500) vs None (GeForce4 440 Go 64M). Decoder: No vs MPEG-2 VPE.
| Feature | GeForce FX 5500 | GeForce4 440 Go 64M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | No | None |
| Decoder | No | MPEG-2 VPE |
| Codecs | MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce FX 5500 draws 25W versus the GeForce4 440 Go 64M's 32W — a 24.6% difference. The GeForce FX 5500 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce FX 5500) vs 350W (GeForce4 440 Go 64M). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 171mm vs 0mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 85.
| Feature | GeForce FX 5500 | GeForce4 440 Go 64M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 25W-22% | 32W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 171mm | 0mm |
| Height | 111mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C-18% | 85 |
| Perf/Watt | 0.3+50% | 0.2 |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is GeForce FX 5500 (2021 vs 2012).
| Feature | GeForce FX 5500 | GeForce4 440 Go 64M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $37 | — |
| Codename | TU117S | GK107 |
| Release | December 17 2021 | October 1 2012 |
| Ranking | #468 | #903 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













