GeForce4 440 Go 64M vs Quadro FX 500/FX 600

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce4 440 Go 64M vs Quadro FX 500/FX 600 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce4 440 Go 64M vs Quadro FX 500/FX 600: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce4 440 Go 64M

2012

Why buy it

✅Draws 32W instead of 189W, a 157W reduction.
✅More future proof: Kepler (2012−2018) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (6 vs 8).
❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2012 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $449 MSRP).

Quadro FX 500/FX 600

2008

Why buy it

✅+33.3% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($449 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅700% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 512 MB).

Trade-offs

❌2008 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌490.6% higher power demand at 189W vs 32W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Quadro FX 500/FX 600 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 33.3% in PassMark G3D (8 vs 6), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce4 440 Go 64M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 28nm process instead of 55nm and a newer 2012 generation instead of 2008. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Quadro FX 500/FX 600 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Quadro FX 500/FX 600 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce4 440 Go 64M has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce4 440 Go 64M vs Quadro FX 500/FX 600 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce4 440 Go 64M

The GeForce4 440 Go 64M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 1 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is Up to 710 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 32W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6 points.

Quadro FX 500/FX 600

The Quadro FX 500/FX 600 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8 points. Launch price was $3,499.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce4 440 Go 64M scores 6 versus the Quadro FX 500/FX 600's 8 — the Quadro FX 500/FX 600 leads by 33.3%. The GeForce4 440 Go 64M is built on Kepler while the Quadro FX 500/FX 600 uses Tesla 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce4 440 Go 64M) vs 240 (Quadro FX 500/FX 600). Raw compute: 0.5445 TFLOPS (GeForce4 440 Go 64M) vs 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 500/FX 600).

Feature	GeForce4 440 Go 64M	Quadro FX 500/FX 600
G3D Mark Score	6	8+33%
Architecture	Kepler	Tesla 2.0
Process Node	28 nm	55 nm
Shading Units	384+60%	240
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.5445 TFLOPS	0.6221 TFLOPS+14%
ROPs	16	32+100%
TMUs	32	80+150%
L2 Cache	256 KB	256 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce4 440 Go 64M gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Quadro FX 500/FX 600 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce4 440 Go 64M	Quadro FX 500/FX 600
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce4 440 Go 64M has 512 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro FX 500/FX 600 carries 4 GB. Quadro FX 500/FX 600 gives you 700% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce4 440 Go 64M and 64-bit on the Quadro FX 500/FX 600.

Feature	GeForce4 440 Go 64M	Quadro FX 500/FX 600
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	4 GB+700%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	256 KB	256 KB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce4 440 Go 64M draws 32W versus the Quadro FX 500/FX 600's 189W — a 142.1% difference. The GeForce4 440 Go 64M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce4 440 Go 64M) vs 350W (Quadro FX 500/FX 600). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	GeForce4 440 Go 64M	Quadro FX 500/FX 600
TDP	32W-83%	189W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	0mm	—
Height	0mm	—
Slots	0	—
Temp (Load)	85	—
Perf/Watt	0.2	0.0

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is GeForce4 440 Go 64M (2012 vs 2008).

Feature	GeForce4 440 Go 64M	Quadro FX 500/FX 600
MSRP	—	$449
Codename	GK107	GT200B
Release	October 1 2012	November 11 2008
Ranking	#903	#815

Search GeForce4 440 Go 64M on Amazon

Search Quadro FX 500/FX 600 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.