
GeForce3 Ti 500 vs MOBILITY RADEON 7500

GeForce3 Ti 500
Popular choices:

MOBILITY RADEON 7500
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce3 Ti 500 is positioned at rank 390 and the MOBILITY RADEON 7500 is on rank 744, so the GeForce3 Ti 500 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce3 Ti 500
Performance Per Dollar MOBILITY RADEON 7500
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce3 Ti 500 is significantly newer (2025 vs 2010). The GeForce3 Ti 500 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The MOBILITY RADEON 7500 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The MOBILITY RADEON 7500 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 33.3% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce3 Ti 500 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | GeForce3 Ti 500 | MOBILITY RADEON 7500 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-33.3%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+33.3%) |
| Longevity | Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026) (5nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+693.7%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The MOBILITY RADEON 7500 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $15 versus $49 for the GeForce3 Ti 500, it costs 69% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 335.6% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce3 Ti 500 | MOBILITY RADEON 7500 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+335.6%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($49) | ✅More affordable ($15) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce3 Ti 500 and MOBILITY RADEON 7500

GeForce3 Ti 500
The GeForce3 Ti 500 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 30 2025. It features the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2017 MHz to 2407 MHz. It has 21760 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 575W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 170 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3 points. Launch price was $1,999.

MOBILITY RADEON 7500
The MOBILITY RADEON 7500 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce3 Ti 500 scores 3 versus the MOBILITY RADEON 7500's 4 — the MOBILITY RADEON 7500 leads by 33.3%. The GeForce3 Ti 500 is built on Blackwell 2.0 while the MOBILITY RADEON 7500 uses TeraScale 2, both on 5 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 21,760 (GeForce3 Ti 500) vs 800 (MOBILITY RADEON 7500). Raw compute: 104.8 TFLOPS (GeForce3 Ti 500) vs 1.12 TFLOPS (MOBILITY RADEON 7500).
| Feature | GeForce3 Ti 500 | MOBILITY RADEON 7500 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3 | 4+33% |
| Architecture | Blackwell 2.0 | TeraScale 2 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 21760+2620% | 800 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 104.8 TFLOPS+9257% | 1.12 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 176+1000% | 16 |
| TMUs | 680+1600% | 40 |
| L1 Cache | 21.3 MB+26525% | 0.08 MB |
| L2 Cache | 96 MB+38300% | 0.25 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce3 Ti 500 | MOBILITY RADEON 7500 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce3 Ti 500 comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the MOBILITY RADEON 7500 has 65 MB. The GeForce3 Ti 500 offers 693.7% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 96 MB (GeForce3 Ti 500) vs 0.25 MB (MOBILITY RADEON 7500) — the GeForce3 Ti 500 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce3 Ti 500 | MOBILITY RADEON 7500 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB+694% | 0.063 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 96 MB+38300% | 0.25 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 8.1 (GeForce3 Ti 500) vs 7.0 (MOBILITY RADEON 7500). OpenGL: 1.5 vs 1.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce3 Ti 500 | MOBILITY RADEON 7500 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 8.1+16% | 7.0 |
| OpenGL | 1.5+15% | 1.3 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce3 Ti 500 draws 575W versus the MOBILITY RADEON 7500's 50W — a 168% difference. The MOBILITY RADEON 7500 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce3 Ti 500) vs 350W (MOBILITY RADEON 7500). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 80 vs 70°C.
| Feature | GeForce3 Ti 500 | MOBILITY RADEON 7500 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 575W | 50W-91% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 183mm | — |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 80 | 70°C-13% |
| Perf/Watt | 0.0 | 0.1 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce3 Ti 500 launched at $349 MSRP and currently averages $49, while the MOBILITY RADEON 7500 launched at $49 and now averages $15. The MOBILITY RADEON 7500 costs 69.4% less ($34 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 0.1 (GeForce3 Ti 500) vs 0.3 (MOBILITY RADEON 7500) — the MOBILITY RADEON 7500 offers 200% better value. The GeForce3 Ti 500 is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2010).
| Feature | GeForce3 Ti 500 | MOBILITY RADEON 7500 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $349 | $49-86% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $49 | $15-69% |
| Performance per Dollar | 0.1 | 0.3+200% |
| Codename | GB202 | Broadway |
| Release | January 30 2025 | January 7 2010 |
| Ranking | #3 | #846 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















