GeForce3 Ti 500 vs GeForce4 MX 460

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce3 Ti 500 vs GeForce4 MX 460 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce3 Ti 500 vs GeForce4 MX 460: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce3 Ti 500

2025

Why buy it

✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 128 MB).
✅Better long-term bet: Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
✅More future proof: Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (3 vs 4).
❌
95% HIGHER MSRP
$349 MSRPvs$179 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.0 vs 0.0 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs $179 MSRP).
❌259.4% higher power demand at 575W vs 160W.
❌10.9% longer card at 183mm vs 165mm.

GeForce4 MX 460

2010

Why buy it

✅+33.3% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Costs $170 less on MSRP ($179 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
✅Delivers 160% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.0 vs 0.0 G3D/$ ($179 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
✅Draws 160W instead of 575W, a 415W reduction.
✅Measures 165mm instead of 183mm, a 18mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 128 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2010 hardware with 128 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce4 MX 460 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 33.3% in PassMark G3D (4 vs 3), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce3 Ti 500 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 512 MB vs 128 MB of VRAM, a 5nm process instead of 40nm, 170 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2025 generation instead of 2010. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce4 MX 460 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $170 cheaper on MSRP at $179 vs $349, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 160% (0.0 vs 0.0), so the value case lines up with the gaming result. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, GeForce4 MX 460 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce3 Ti 500 has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce3 Ti 500 vs GeForce4 MX 460 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce3 Ti 500

The GeForce3 Ti 500 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 30 2025. It features the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2017 MHz to 2407 MHz. It has 21760 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 575W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 170 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3 points. Launch price was $1,999.

GeForce4 MX 460

The GeForce4 MX 460 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 12 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 675 MHz. It has 336 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4 points. Launch price was $229.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce3 Ti 500 scores 3 versus the GeForce4 MX 460's 4 — the GeForce4 MX 460 leads by 33.3%. The GeForce3 Ti 500 is built on Blackwell 2.0 while the GeForce4 MX 460 uses Fermi, both on 5 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 21,760 (GeForce3 Ti 500) vs 336 (GeForce4 MX 460). Raw compute: 104.8 TFLOPS (GeForce3 Ti 500) vs 0.9072 TFLOPS (GeForce4 MX 460).

Feature	GeForce3 Ti 500	GeForce4 MX 460
G3D Mark Score	3	4+33%
Architecture	Blackwell 2.0	Fermi
Process Node	5 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	21760+6376%	336
Compute (TFLOPS)	104.8 TFLOPS+11452%	0.9072 TFLOPS
ROPs	176+450%	32
TMUs	680+1114%	56
L1 Cache	21.3 MB+4741%	0.44 MB
L2 Cache	96 MB+19100%	0.5 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce3 Ti 500	GeForce4 MX 460
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce3 Ti 500 has 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce4 MX 460 carries 128 MB. GeForce3 Ti 500 gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce3 Ti 500 and 64-bit on the GeForce4 MX 460. L2 Cache: 96 MB (GeForce3 Ti 500) vs 0.5 MB (GeForce4 MX 460) — the GeForce3 Ti 500 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce3 Ti 500	GeForce4 MX 460
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB+300%	0.125 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	96 MB+19100%	0.5 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 8.1 (GeForce3 Ti 500) vs 7.0 (GeForce4 MX 460). Vulkan: N/A vs None. OpenGL: 1.5 vs 1.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 1.

Feature	GeForce3 Ti 500	GeForce4 MX 460
DirectX	8.1+16%	7.0
Vulkan	N/A	None
OpenGL	1.5+15%	1.3
Max Displays	2+100%	1

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: None (GeForce3 Ti 500) vs No (GeForce4 MX 460). Decoder: MPEG-2 vs No.

Feature	GeForce3 Ti 500	GeForce4 MX 460
Encoder	None	No
Decoder	MPEG-2	No
Codecs	MPEG-2

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce3 Ti 500 draws 575W versus the GeForce4 MX 460's 160W — a 112.9% difference. The GeForce4 MX 460 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce3 Ti 500) vs 350W (GeForce4 MX 460). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 183mm vs 165mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 80 vs 60°C.

Feature	GeForce3 Ti 500	GeForce4 MX 460
TDP	575W	160W-72%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	183mm	165mm
Height	0mm	100mm
Slots	1	1
Temp (Load)	80	60°C-25%
Perf/Watt	0.0	0.0

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce3 Ti 500 came in at $349, while the GeForce4 MX 460 launched at $179. On MSRP, GeForce4 MX 460 was 48.7% cheaper ($170 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.0 (GeForce3 Ti 500) vs 0.0 (GeForce4 MX 460) — the GeForce4 MX 460 offers 0% better value. The newer card here is GeForce3 Ti 500 (2025 vs 2010).

Feature	GeForce3 Ti 500	GeForce4 MX 460
MSRP	$349	$179-49%
Performance per Dollar	0.0	0.0
Codename	GB202	GF104
Release	January 30 2025	July 12 2010
Ranking	#3	#652

Search GeForce3 Ti 500 on Amazon

Search GeForce4 MX 460 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.