
GeForce3 Ti 500

RADEON 9200
GeForce3 Ti 500 vs RADEON 9200 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce3 Ti 500 vs RADEON 9200 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6

Call of Duty: Warzone

Euro Truck Simulator 2
GeForce3 Ti 500 vs RADEON 9200: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce3 Ti 500
2025Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 256 MB).
- ✅Better long-term bet: Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
- ✅More future proof: Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (3 vs 4).
- ❌252.5% HIGHER MSRP$349 MSRPvs$99 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.0 vs 0.0 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs $99 MSRP).
- ❌1050% higher power demand at 575W vs 50W.
RADEON 9200
2019Why buy it
- ✅+33.3% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $250 less on MSRP ($99 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 370% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.0 vs 0.0 G3D/$ ($99 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 575W, a 525W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 256 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2019 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce3 Ti 500 vs RADEON 9200 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce3 Ti 500
The GeForce3 Ti 500 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 30 2025. It features the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2017 MHz to 2407 MHz. It has 21760 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 575W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 170 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3 points. Launch price was $1,999.

RADEON 9200
The RADEON 9200 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 13 2019. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 730 MHz to 1024 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce3 Ti 500 scores 3 versus the RADEON 9200's 4 — the RADEON 9200 leads by 33.3%. The GeForce3 Ti 500 is built on Blackwell 2.0 while the RADEON 9200 uses GCN 3.0, both on 5 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 21,760 (GeForce3 Ti 500) vs 384 (RADEON 9200). Raw compute: 104.8 TFLOPS (GeForce3 Ti 500) vs 0.7864 TFLOPS (RADEON 9200). Boost clocks: 2407 MHz vs 1024 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce3 Ti 500 | RADEON 9200 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3 | 4+33% |
| Architecture | Blackwell 2.0 | GCN 3.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 21760+5567% | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 104.8 TFLOPS+13227% | 0.7864 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2407 MHz+135% | 1024 MHz |
| ROPs | 176+2100% | 8 |
| TMUs | 680+2733% | 24 |
| L1 Cache | 21.3 MB+23567% | 0.09 MB |
| L2 Cache | 96 MB+73746% | 0.13 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce3 Ti 500 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The RADEON 9200 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce3 Ti 500 | RADEON 9200 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce3 Ti 500 has 512 MB of VRAM, while the RADEON 9200 carries 256 MB. GeForce3 Ti 500 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce3 Ti 500 and 64-bit on the RADEON 9200. L2 Cache: 96 MB (GeForce3 Ti 500) vs 0.13 MB (RADEON 9200) — the GeForce3 Ti 500 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce3 Ti 500 | RADEON 9200 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB+100% | 0.25 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 96 MB+73746% | 0.13 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce3 Ti 500 draws 575W versus the RADEON 9200's 50W — a 168% difference. The RADEON 9200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce3 Ti 500) vs 350W (RADEON 9200). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy.
| Feature | GeForce3 Ti 500 | RADEON 9200 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 575W | 50W-91% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Legacy |
| Length | 183mm | — |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 80 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 0.0 | 0.1 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce3 Ti 500 came in at $349, while the RADEON 9200 launched at $99. On MSRP, RADEON 9200 was 71.6% cheaper ($250 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.0 (GeForce3 Ti 500) vs 0.0 (RADEON 9200) — the RADEON 9200 offers 0% better value. The newer card here is GeForce3 Ti 500 (2025 vs 2019).
| Feature | GeForce3 Ti 500 | RADEON 9200 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $349 | $99-72% |
| Performance per Dollar | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Codename | GB202 | Polaris 24 |
| Release | January 30 2025 | May 13 2019 |
| Ranking | #3 | #898 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














