GeForce3 Ti 500 vs RADEON 9200

NVIDIA

GeForce3 Ti 500

2025Core: 2017 MHzBoost: 2407 MHz
Similar parts
·····
VS
AMD

RADEON 9200

2019Core: 730 MHzBoost: 1024 MHz

GeForce3 Ti 500 vs RADEON 9200 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce3 Ti 500 vs RADEON 9200 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce3 Ti 500 vs RADEON 9200: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce3 Ti 500

2025

Why buy it

  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 256 MB).
  • Better long-term bet: Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
  • More future proof: Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark G3D performance (3 vs 4).
  • 252.5% HIGHER MSRP
    $349 MSRPvs$99 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.0 vs 0.0 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs $99 MSRP).
  • 1050% higher power demand at 575W vs 50W.

RADEON 9200

2019

Why buy it

  • +33.3% higher PassMark G3D performance.
  • Costs $250 less on MSRP ($99 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
  • Delivers 370% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.0 vs 0.0 G3D/$ ($99 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
  • Draws 50W instead of 575W, a 525W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 256 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2019 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
RADEON 9200 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 33.3% in PassMark G3D (4 vs 3), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce3 Ti 500 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 512 MB vs 256 MB of VRAM, a 5nm process instead of 28nm, 170 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2025 generation instead of 2019. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
RADEON 9200 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $250 cheaper on MSRP at $99 vs $349, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 370% (0.0 vs 0.0), so the value case lines up with the gaming result. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, RADEON 9200 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce3 Ti 500 has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce3 Ti 500 vs RADEON 9200 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce3 Ti 500

The GeForce3 Ti 500 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 30 2025. It features the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2017 MHz to 2407 MHz. It has 21760 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 575W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 170 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3 points. Launch price was $1,999.

AMD

RADEON 9200

The RADEON 9200 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 13 2019. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 730 MHz to 1024 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4 points.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce3 Ti 500 scores 3 versus the RADEON 9200's 4 — the RADEON 9200 leads by 33.3%. The GeForce3 Ti 500 is built on Blackwell 2.0 while the RADEON 9200 uses GCN 3.0, both on 5 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 21,760 (GeForce3 Ti 500) vs 384 (RADEON 9200). Raw compute: 104.8 TFLOPS (GeForce3 Ti 500) vs 0.7864 TFLOPS (RADEON 9200). Boost clocks: 2407 MHz vs 1024 MHz.

FeatureGeForce3 Ti 500RADEON 9200
G3D Mark Score
3
4+33%
Architecture
Blackwell 2.0
GCN 3.0
Process Node
5 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
21760+5567%
384
Compute (TFLOPS)
104.8 TFLOPS+13227%
0.7864 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
2407 MHz+135%
1024 MHz
ROPs
176+2100%
8
TMUs
680+2733%
24
L1 Cache
21.3 MB+23567%
0.09 MB
L2 Cache
96 MB+73746%
0.13 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce3 Ti 500 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The RADEON 9200 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce3 Ti 500RADEON 9200
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce3 Ti 500 has 512 MB of VRAM, while the RADEON 9200 carries 256 MB. GeForce3 Ti 500 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce3 Ti 500 and 64-bit on the RADEON 9200. L2 Cache: 96 MB (GeForce3 Ti 500) vs 0.13 MB (RADEON 9200) — the GeForce3 Ti 500 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce3 Ti 500RADEON 9200
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB+100%
0.25 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
64-bit
L2 Cache
96 MB+73746%
0.13 MB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce3 Ti 500 draws 575W versus the RADEON 9200's 50W — a 168% difference. The RADEON 9200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce3 Ti 500) vs 350W (RADEON 9200). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy.

FeatureGeForce3 Ti 500RADEON 9200
TDP
575W
50W-91%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
Legacy
Length
183mm
Height
0mm
Slots
1
Temp (Load)
80
Perf/Watt
0.0
0.1
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce3 Ti 500 came in at $349, while the RADEON 9200 launched at $99. On MSRP, RADEON 9200 was 71.6% cheaper ($250 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.0 (GeForce3 Ti 500) vs 0.0 (RADEON 9200) — the RADEON 9200 offers 0% better value. The newer card here is GeForce3 Ti 500 (2025 vs 2019).

FeatureGeForce3 Ti 500RADEON 9200
MSRP
$349
$99-72%
Performance per Dollar
0.0
0.0
Codename
GB202
Polaris 24
Release
January 30 2025
May 13 2019
Ranking
#3
#898

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.