GeForce2 MX/MX 400 vs GeForce3 Ti 500

NVIDIA

GeForce2 MX/MX 400

2020Core: 1395 MHzBoost: 1575 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce3 Ti 500

2025Core: 2017 MHzBoost: 2407 MHz
Similar parts
····

GeForce2 MX/MX 400 vs GeForce3 Ti 500 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce2 MX/MX 400 vs GeForce3 Ti 500 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce2 MX/MX 400 vs GeForce3 Ti 500: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce2 MX/MX 400

2020

Why buy it

  • +33.3% higher PassMark G3D performance.
  • Costs $220 less on MSRP ($129 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
  • Delivers 260.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.0 vs 0.0 G3D/$ ($129 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
  • Draws 25W instead of 575W, a 550W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • 2020 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.

GeForce3 Ti 500

2025

Why buy it

  • Better long-term bet: Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
  • More future proof: Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark G3D performance (3 vs 4).
  • 170.5% HIGHER MSRP
    $349 MSRPvs$129 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.0 vs 0.0 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs $129 MSRP).
  • 2200% higher power demand at 575W vs 25W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce2 MX/MX 400 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 33.3% in PassMark G3D (4 vs 3), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce3 Ti 500 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 5nm process instead of 12nm, 170 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2025 generation instead of 2020. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce2 MX/MX 400 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $220 cheaper on MSRP at $129 vs $349, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 260.7% (0.0 vs 0.0), so the value case lines up with the gaming result. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, GeForce2 MX/MX 400 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce3 Ti 500 has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce2 MX/MX 400 vs GeForce3 Ti 500 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce2 MX/MX 400

The GeForce2 MX/MX 400 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 1 2020. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1395 MHz to 1575 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4 points.

NVIDIA

GeForce3 Ti 500

The GeForce3 Ti 500 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 30 2025. It features the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2017 MHz to 2407 MHz. It has 21760 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 575W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 170 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3 points. Launch price was $1,999.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce2 MX/MX 400 scores 4 versus the GeForce3 Ti 500's 3 — the GeForce2 MX/MX 400 leads by 33.3%. The GeForce2 MX/MX 400 is built on Turing while the GeForce3 Ti 500 uses Blackwell 2.0, both on 12 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 896 (GeForce2 MX/MX 400) vs 21,760 (GeForce3 Ti 500). Raw compute: 3.226 TFLOPS (GeForce2 MX/MX 400) vs 104.8 TFLOPS (GeForce3 Ti 500). Boost clocks: 1575 MHz vs 2407 MHz.

FeatureGeForce2 MX/MX 400GeForce3 Ti 500
G3D Mark Score
4+33%
3
Architecture
Turing
Blackwell 2.0
Process Node
12 nm
5 nm
Shading Units
896
21760+2329%
Compute (TFLOPS)
3.226 TFLOPS
104.8 TFLOPS+3149%
Boost Clock
1575 MHz
2407 MHz+53%
ROPs
32
176+450%
TMUs
64
680+963%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce2 MX/MX 400GeForce3 Ti 500
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce2 MX/MX 400 and 64-bit on the GeForce3 Ti 500.

FeatureGeForce2 MX/MX 400GeForce3 Ti 500
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
64-bit
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 7.0 (GeForce2 MX/MX 400) vs 8.1 (GeForce3 Ti 500). OpenGL: 1.2 vs 1.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

FeatureGeForce2 MX/MX 400GeForce3 Ti 500
DirectX
7.0
8.1+16%
OpenGL
1.2
1.5+25%
Max Displays
2
2
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: None (GeForce2 MX/MX 400) vs None (GeForce3 Ti 500). Decoder: MPEG-2 Decoder vs MPEG-2. Supported codecs: MPEG-2 (GeForce2 MX/MX 400) vs MPEG-2 (GeForce3 Ti 500).

FeatureGeForce2 MX/MX 400GeForce3 Ti 500
Encoder
None
None
Decoder
MPEG-2 Decoder
MPEG-2
Codecs
MPEG-2
MPEG-2
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce2 MX/MX 400 draws 25W versus the GeForce3 Ti 500's 575W — a 183.3% difference. The GeForce2 MX/MX 400 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce2 MX/MX 400) vs 350W (GeForce3 Ti 500). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 55°C vs 80.

FeatureGeForce2 MX/MX 400GeForce3 Ti 500
TDP
25W-96%
575W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
183mm
Height
100mm
0mm
Slots
1
1
Temp (Load)
55°C-31%
80
Perf/Watt
0.2
0.0
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce2 MX/MX 400 came in at $129, while the GeForce3 Ti 500 launched at $349. On MSRP, GeForce2 MX/MX 400 was 63% cheaper ($220 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.0 (GeForce2 MX/MX 400) vs 0.0 (GeForce3 Ti 500) — the GeForce3 Ti 500 offers 0% better value. The newer card here is GeForce3 Ti 500 (2025 vs 2020).

FeatureGeForce2 MX/MX 400GeForce3 Ti 500
MSRP
$129-63%
$349
Performance per Dollar
0.0
0.0
Codename
N17S-G5 / GP107-670-A1
GB202
Release
August 1 2020
January 30 2025
Ranking
#523
#3

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.