
GeForce2 MX/MX 400

GeForce3 Ti 500
GeForce2 MX/MX 400 vs GeForce3 Ti 500 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce2 MX/MX 400 vs GeForce3 Ti 500 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce2 MX/MX 400 vs GeForce3 Ti 500: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce2 MX/MX 400
2020Why buy it
- ✅+33.3% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $220 less on MSRP ($129 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 260.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.0 vs 0.0 G3D/$ ($129 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 25W instead of 575W, a 550W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌2020 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
GeForce3 Ti 500
2025Why buy it
- ✅Better long-term bet: Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
- ✅More future proof: Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (3 vs 4).
- ❌170.5% HIGHER MSRP$349 MSRPvs$129 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.0 vs 0.0 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs $129 MSRP).
- ❌2200% higher power demand at 575W vs 25W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce2 MX/MX 400 vs GeForce3 Ti 500 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce2 MX/MX 400
The GeForce2 MX/MX 400 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 1 2020. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1395 MHz to 1575 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4 points.

GeForce3 Ti 500
The GeForce3 Ti 500 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 30 2025. It features the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2017 MHz to 2407 MHz. It has 21760 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 575W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 170 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3 points. Launch price was $1,999.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce2 MX/MX 400 scores 4 versus the GeForce3 Ti 500's 3 — the GeForce2 MX/MX 400 leads by 33.3%. The GeForce2 MX/MX 400 is built on Turing while the GeForce3 Ti 500 uses Blackwell 2.0, both on 12 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 896 (GeForce2 MX/MX 400) vs 21,760 (GeForce3 Ti 500). Raw compute: 3.226 TFLOPS (GeForce2 MX/MX 400) vs 104.8 TFLOPS (GeForce3 Ti 500). Boost clocks: 1575 MHz vs 2407 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce2 MX/MX 400 | GeForce3 Ti 500 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4+33% | 3 |
| Architecture | Turing | Blackwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 896 | 21760+2329% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.226 TFLOPS | 104.8 TFLOPS+3149% |
| Boost Clock | 1575 MHz | 2407 MHz+53% |
| ROPs | 32 | 176+450% |
| TMUs | 64 | 680+963% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce2 MX/MX 400 | GeForce3 Ti 500 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce2 MX/MX 400 and 64-bit on the GeForce3 Ti 500.
| Feature | GeForce2 MX/MX 400 | GeForce3 Ti 500 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 7.0 (GeForce2 MX/MX 400) vs 8.1 (GeForce3 Ti 500). OpenGL: 1.2 vs 1.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce2 MX/MX 400 | GeForce3 Ti 500 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 7.0 | 8.1+16% |
| OpenGL | 1.2 | 1.5+25% |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (GeForce2 MX/MX 400) vs None (GeForce3 Ti 500). Decoder: MPEG-2 Decoder vs MPEG-2. Supported codecs: MPEG-2 (GeForce2 MX/MX 400) vs MPEG-2 (GeForce3 Ti 500).
| Feature | GeForce2 MX/MX 400 | GeForce3 Ti 500 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | None |
| Decoder | MPEG-2 Decoder | MPEG-2 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2 | MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce2 MX/MX 400 draws 25W versus the GeForce3 Ti 500's 575W — a 183.3% difference. The GeForce2 MX/MX 400 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce2 MX/MX 400) vs 350W (GeForce3 Ti 500). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 55°C vs 80.
| Feature | GeForce2 MX/MX 400 | GeForce3 Ti 500 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 25W-96% | 575W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 183mm |
| Height | 100mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 1 | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 55°C-31% | 80 |
| Perf/Watt | 0.2 | 0.0 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce2 MX/MX 400 came in at $129, while the GeForce3 Ti 500 launched at $349. On MSRP, GeForce2 MX/MX 400 was 63% cheaper ($220 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.0 (GeForce2 MX/MX 400) vs 0.0 (GeForce3 Ti 500) — the GeForce3 Ti 500 offers 0% better value. The newer card here is GeForce3 Ti 500 (2025 vs 2020).
| Feature | GeForce2 MX/MX 400 | GeForce3 Ti 500 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $129-63% | $349 |
| Performance per Dollar | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Codename | N17S-G5 / GP107-670-A1 | GB202 |
| Release | August 1 2020 | January 30 2025 |
| Ranking | #523 | #3 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














