
GeForce2 MX/MX 400

GeForce3
GeForce2 MX/MX 400 vs GeForce3 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce2 MX/MX 400 vs GeForce3 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce2 MX/MX 400 vs GeForce3: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce2 MX/MX 400
2020Why buy it
- ✅Costs $370 less on MSRP ($129 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 209.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.0 vs 0.0 G3D/$ ($129 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
- ✅693.7% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 65 MB).
- ✅GeForce3 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GeForce2 MX/MX 400 is the less risky modern option long term.
- ✅Draws 25W instead of 33W, a 8W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (4 vs 5).
- ❌2020 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
GeForce3
2015Why buy it
- ✅+25% higher PassMark G3D performance.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 65 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2015 hardware with 65 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌286.8% HIGHER MSRP$499 MSRPvs$129 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.0 vs 0.0 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs $129 MSRP).
- ❌32% higher power demand at 33W vs 25W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce2 MX/MX 400 vs GeForce3 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce2 MX/MX 400
The GeForce2 MX/MX 400 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 1 2020. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1395 MHz to 1575 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4 points.

GeForce3
The GeForce3 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 928 MHz to 941 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce2 MX/MX 400 scores 4 versus the GeForce3's 5 — the GeForce3 leads by 25%. The GeForce2 MX/MX 400 is built on Turing while the GeForce3 uses Maxwell, both on 12 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 896 (GeForce2 MX/MX 400) vs 384 (GeForce3). Raw compute: 3.226 TFLOPS (GeForce2 MX/MX 400) vs 0.7227 TFLOPS (GeForce3). Boost clocks: 1575 MHz vs 941 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce2 MX/MX 400 | GeForce3 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4 | 5+25% |
| Architecture | Turing | Maxwell |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 896+133% | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.226 TFLOPS+346% | 0.7227 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1575 MHz+67% | 941 MHz |
| ROPs | 32+300% | 8 |
| TMUs | 64+167% | 24 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce2 MX/MX 400 | GeForce3 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce2 MX/MX 400 has 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce3 carries 65 MB. GeForce2 MX/MX 400 gives you 693.7% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce2 MX/MX 400 and 64-bit on the GeForce3.
| Feature | GeForce2 MX/MX 400 | GeForce3 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB+694% | 0.063 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 7.0 (GeForce2 MX/MX 400) vs 8.1 (GeForce3). OpenGL: 1.2 vs 1.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce2 MX/MX 400 | GeForce3 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 7.0 | 8.1+16% |
| OpenGL | 1.2 | 1.3+8% |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (GeForce2 MX/MX 400) vs None (GeForce3). Decoder: MPEG-2 Decoder vs None. Supported codecs: MPEG-2 (GeForce2 MX/MX 400) vs MPEG-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce3).
| Feature | GeForce2 MX/MX 400 | GeForce3 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | None |
| Decoder | MPEG-2 Decoder | None |
| Codecs | MPEG-2 | MPEG-1,MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce2 MX/MX 400 draws 25W versus the GeForce3's 33W — a 27.6% difference. The GeForce2 MX/MX 400 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce2 MX/MX 400) vs 350W (GeForce3). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 55°C vs 85.
| Feature | GeForce2 MX/MX 400 | GeForce3 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 25W-24% | 33W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 165mm |
| Height | 100mm | 100mm |
| Slots | 1 | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 55°C-35% | 85 |
| Perf/Watt | 0.2 | 0.2 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce2 MX/MX 400 came in at $129, while the GeForce3 launched at $499. On MSRP, GeForce2 MX/MX 400 was 74.1% cheaper ($370 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.0 (GeForce2 MX/MX 400) vs 0.0 (GeForce3) — the GeForce3 offers 0% better value. The newer card here is GeForce2 MX/MX 400 (2020 vs 2015).
| Feature | GeForce2 MX/MX 400 | GeForce3 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $129-74% | $499 |
| Performance per Dollar | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Codename | N17S-G5 / GP107-670-A1 | GM108 |
| Release | August 1 2020 | March 13 2015 |
| Ranking | #523 | #810 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














