GeForce2 MX/MX 400 vs RADEON 9250

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce2 MX/MX 400 vs RADEON 9250 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce2 MX/MX 400 vs RADEON 9250: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce2 MX/MX 400

2020

Why buy it

✅+33.3% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 256 MB).
✅RADEON 9250 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GeForce2 MX/MX 400 is the less risky modern option long term.
✅Draws 25W instead of 95W, a 70W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌2020 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
❌
63.3% HIGHER MSRP
$129 MSRPvs$79 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.0 vs 0.0 G3D/$ ($129 MSRP vs $79 MSRP).

RADEON 9250

2015

Why buy it

✅Costs $50 less on MSRP ($79 MSRP vs $129 MSRP).
✅Delivers 22.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.0 vs 0.0 G3D/$ ($79 MSRP vs $129 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (3 vs 4).
❌Less VRAM, with 256 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2015 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌280% higher power demand at 95W vs 25W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce2 MX/MX 400 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 33.3% in PassMark G3D (4 vs 3), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce2 MX/MX 400 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 512 MB vs 256 MB of VRAM, a 12nm process instead of 28nm, and a newer 2020 generation instead of 2015. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

RADEON 9250 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $50 cheaper on MSRP at $79 vs $129, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 22.5% (0.0 vs 0.0), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, RADEON 9250 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce2 MX/MX 400 has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce2 MX/MX 400 vs RADEON 9250 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce2 MX/MX 400

The GeForce2 MX/MX 400 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 1 2020. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1395 MHz to 1575 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4 points.

RADEON 9250

The RADEON 9250 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in September 29 2015. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 735 MHz to 1000 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 95W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce2 MX/MX 400 scores 4 versus the RADEON 9250's 3 — the GeForce2 MX/MX 400 leads by 33.3%. The GeForce2 MX/MX 400 is built on Turing while the RADEON 9250 uses GCN 3.0, both on 12 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 896 (GeForce2 MX/MX 400) vs 2,048 (RADEON 9250). Raw compute: 3.226 TFLOPS (GeForce2 MX/MX 400) vs 4.096 TFLOPS (RADEON 9250). Boost clocks: 1575 MHz vs 1000 MHz.

Feature	GeForce2 MX/MX 400	RADEON 9250
G3D Mark Score	4+33%	3
Architecture	Turing	GCN 3.0
Process Node	12 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	896	2048+129%
Compute (TFLOPS)	3.226 TFLOPS	4.096 TFLOPS+27%
Boost Clock	1575 MHz+57%	1000 MHz
ROPs	32	32
TMUs	64	128+100%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce2 MX/MX 400 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The RADEON 9250 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce2 MX/MX 400	RADEON 9250
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce2 MX/MX 400 has 512 MB of VRAM, while the RADEON 9250 carries 256 MB. GeForce2 MX/MX 400 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce2 MX/MX 400 and 64-bit on the RADEON 9250.

Feature	GeForce2 MX/MX 400	RADEON 9250
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB+100%	0.25 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce2 MX/MX 400 draws 25W versus the RADEON 9250's 95W — a 116.7% difference. The GeForce2 MX/MX 400 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce2 MX/MX 400) vs 350W (RADEON 9250). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy.

Feature	GeForce2 MX/MX 400	RADEON 9250
TDP	25W-74%	95W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	Legacy
Height	100mm	—
Slots	1	—
Temp (Load)	55°C	—
Perf/Watt	0.2	0.0

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce2 MX/MX 400 came in at $129, while the RADEON 9250 launched at $79. On MSRP, RADEON 9250 was 38.8% cheaper ($50 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.0 (GeForce2 MX/MX 400) vs 0.0 (RADEON 9250) — the RADEON 9250 offers 0% better value. The newer card here is GeForce2 MX/MX 400 (2020 vs 2015).

Feature	GeForce2 MX/MX 400	RADEON 9250
MSRP	$129	$79-39%
Performance per Dollar	0.0	0.0
Codename	N17S-G5 / GP107-670-A1	Amethyst
Release	August 1 2020	September 29 2015
Ranking	#523	#420

Search GeForce2 MX/MX 400 on Amazon

Search RADEON 9250 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.