GeForce2 MX/MX 400 vs GeForce RTX 3070
GeForce2 MX/MX 400
Popular choices:
GeForce RTX 3070
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The GeForce2 MX/MX 400 is positioned at rank #750 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce2 MX/MX 400
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 3070
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 3070 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 554200% higher G3D Mark score and 1500% more VRAM (8 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce2 MX/MX 400.
| Insight | GeForce2 MX/MX 400 | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-554200%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+554200%) |
| Longevity | Turing (2018−2022) (12nm) | 🔮Strong Longevity (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 3070 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $200 (vs $15), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 41472.5% better value per dollar than the GeForce2 MX/MX 400.
| Insight | GeForce2 MX/MX 400 | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+41472.5%) |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($15) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($200) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce2 MX/MX 400 and GeForce RTX 3070
GeForce2 MX/MX 400
The GeForce2 MX/MX 400 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 1 2020. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1395 MHz to 1575 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4 points.
GeForce RTX 3070
The GeForce RTX 3070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1725 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 220W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,172 points. Launch price was $499.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce2 MX/MX 400 scores 4 versus the GeForce RTX 3070's 22,172 — the GeForce RTX 3070 leads by 554200%. The GeForce2 MX/MX 400 is built on Turing while the GeForce RTX 3070 uses Ampere, both on 12 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 896 (GeForce2 MX/MX 400) vs 5,888 (GeForce RTX 3070). Raw compute: 3.226 TFLOPS (GeForce2 MX/MX 400) vs 20.31 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3070). Boost clocks: 1575 MHz vs 1725 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce2 MX/MX 400 | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4 | 22,172+554200% |
| Architecture | Turing | Ampere |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 896 | 5888+557% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.226 TFLOPS | 20.31 TFLOPS+530% |
| Boost Clock | 1575 MHz | 1725 MHz+10% |
| ROPs | 32 | 96+200% |
| TMUs | 64 | 184+188% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce2 MX/MX 400 | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | DLSS 2.0 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce2 MX/MX 400 comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 3070 has 8 GB. The GeForce RTX 3070 offers 1500% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 256-bit.
| Feature | GeForce2 MX/MX 400 | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 8 GB+1500% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 256-bit+300% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 7.0 (GeForce2 MX/MX 400) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3070). OpenGL: 1.2 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce2 MX/MX 400 | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 7.0 | 12 Ultimate+71% |
| OpenGL | 1.2 | 4.6+283% |
| Max Displays | 2 | 4+100% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (GeForce2 MX/MX 400) vs NVENC 7th gen (GeForce RTX 3070). Decoder: MPEG-2 Decoder vs NVDEC 5th gen. Supported codecs: MPEG-2 (GeForce2 MX/MX 400) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 (GeForce RTX 3070).
| Feature | GeForce2 MX/MX 400 | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | NVENC 7th gen |
| Decoder | MPEG-2 Decoder | NVDEC 5th gen |
| Codecs | MPEG-2 | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce2 MX/MX 400 draws 25W versus the GeForce RTX 3070's 220W — a 159.2% difference. The GeForce2 MX/MX 400 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce2 MX/MX 400) vs 650W (GeForce RTX 3070). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin. Typical load temperature: 55°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce2 MX/MX 400 | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 25W-89% | 220W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-46% | 650W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 8-pin |
| Length | — | 242mm |
| Height | 100mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 1-50% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 55°C-27% | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 0.2 | 100.8+50300% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce2 MX/MX 400 launched at $129 MSRP and currently averages $15, while the GeForce RTX 3070 launched at $499 and now averages $200. The GeForce2 MX/MX 400 costs 92.5% less ($185 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 0.3 (GeForce2 MX/MX 400) vs 110.9 (GeForce RTX 3070) — the GeForce RTX 3070 offers 36866.7% better value.
| Feature | GeForce2 MX/MX 400 | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $129-74% | $499 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $15-93% | $200 |
| Performance per Dollar | 0.3 | 110.9+36867% |
| Codename | N17S-G5 / GP107-670-A1 | GA104 |
| Release | August 1 2020 | September 1 2020 |
| Ranking | #523 | #63 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce2 MX/MX 400 and GeForce RTX 3070
