GeForce2 MX/MX 400 vs GeForce4 Ti 4800

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce2 MX/MX 400 vs GeForce4 Ti 4800 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce2 MX/MX 400 vs GeForce4 Ti 4800: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce2 MX/MX 400

2020

Why buy it

✅Costs $270 less on MSRP ($129 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
✅Delivers 106.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.0 vs 0.0 G3D/$ ($129 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
✅GeForce4 Ti 4800 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GeForce2 MX/MX 400 is the less risky modern option long term.
✅Draws 25W instead of 250W, a 225W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (4 vs 6).
❌2020 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.

GeForce4 Ti 4800

2010

Why buy it

✅+50% higher PassMark G3D performance.

Trade-offs

❌2010 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
209.3% HIGHER MSRP
$399 MSRPvs$129 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.0 vs 0.0 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $129 MSRP).
❌900% higher power demand at 250W vs 25W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce4 Ti 4800 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 50% in PassMark G3D (6 vs 4), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce2 MX/MX 400 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 12nm process instead of 40nm and a newer 2020 generation instead of 2010. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce2 MX/MX 400 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $270 cheaper on MSRP at $129 vs $399, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 106.2% (0.0 vs 0.0), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. GeForce4 Ti 4800 still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GeForce2 MX/MX 400 vs GeForce4 Ti 4800 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce2 MX/MX 400

The GeForce2 MX/MX 400 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 1 2020. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1395 MHz to 1575 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4 points.

GeForce4 Ti 4800

The GeForce4 Ti 4800 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 26 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6 points. Launch price was $499.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce2 MX/MX 400 scores 4 versus the GeForce4 Ti 4800's 6 — the GeForce4 Ti 4800 leads by 50%. The GeForce2 MX/MX 400 is built on Turing while the GeForce4 Ti 4800 uses Fermi, both on 12 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 896 (GeForce2 MX/MX 400) vs 480 (GeForce4 Ti 4800). Raw compute: 3.226 TFLOPS (GeForce2 MX/MX 400) vs 1.345 TFLOPS (GeForce4 Ti 4800).

Feature	GeForce2 MX/MX 400	GeForce4 Ti 4800
G3D Mark Score	4	6+50%
Architecture	Turing	Fermi
Process Node	12 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	896+87%	480
Compute (TFLOPS)	3.226 TFLOPS+140%	1.345 TFLOPS
ROPs	32	48+50%
TMUs	64+7%	60

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce2 MX/MX 400	GeForce4 Ti 4800
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce2 MX/MX 400 and 64-bit on the GeForce4 Ti 4800.

Feature	GeForce2 MX/MX 400	GeForce4 Ti 4800
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 7.0 (GeForce2 MX/MX 400) vs 8.1 (GeForce4 Ti 4800). OpenGL: 1.2 vs 1.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

Feature	GeForce2 MX/MX 400	GeForce4 Ti 4800
DirectX	7.0	8.1+16%
OpenGL	1.2	1.3+8%
Max Displays	2	2

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: None (GeForce2 MX/MX 400) vs No (GeForce4 Ti 4800). Decoder: MPEG-2 Decoder vs No.

Feature	GeForce2 MX/MX 400	GeForce4 Ti 4800
Encoder	None	No
Decoder	MPEG-2 Decoder	No
Codecs	MPEG-2

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce2 MX/MX 400 draws 25W versus the GeForce4 Ti 4800's 250W — a 163.6% difference. The GeForce2 MX/MX 400 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce2 MX/MX 400) vs 350W (GeForce4 Ti 4800). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 55°C vs 65°C.

Feature	GeForce2 MX/MX 400	GeForce4 Ti 4800
TDP	25W-90%	250W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	—	216mm
Height	100mm	111mm
Slots	1	1
Temp (Load)	55°C-15%	65°C
Perf/Watt	0.2	0.0

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce2 MX/MX 400 came in at $129, while the GeForce4 Ti 4800 launched at $399. On MSRP, GeForce2 MX/MX 400 was 67.7% cheaper ($270 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.0 (GeForce2 MX/MX 400) vs 0.0 (GeForce4 Ti 4800) — the GeForce4 Ti 4800 offers 0% better value. The newer card here is GeForce2 MX/MX 400 (2020 vs 2010).

Feature	GeForce2 MX/MX 400	GeForce4 Ti 4800
MSRP	$129-68%	$399
Performance per Dollar	0.0	0.0
Codename	N17S-G5 / GP107-670-A1	GF100
Release	August 1 2020	March 26 2010
Ranking	#523	#488

Search GeForce2 MX/MX 400 on Amazon

Search GeForce4 Ti 4800 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.