
GeForce2 MX/MX 400

GeForce4 440 Go 64M
GeForce2 MX/MX 400 vs GeForce4 440 Go 64M Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce2 MX/MX 400 vs GeForce4 440 Go 64M FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce2 MX/MX 400 vs GeForce4 440 Go 64M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce2 MX/MX 400
2020Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($129 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅GeForce4 440 Go 64M is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GeForce2 MX/MX 400 is the less risky modern option long term.
- ✅Draws 25W instead of 32W, a 7W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (4 vs 6).
- ❌2020 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
GeForce4 440 Go 64M
2012Why buy it
- ✅+50% higher PassMark G3D performance.
Trade-offs
- ❌2012 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $129 MSRP).
- ❌28% higher power demand at 32W vs 25W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce2 MX/MX 400 vs GeForce4 440 Go 64M Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce2 MX/MX 400
The GeForce2 MX/MX 400 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 1 2020. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1395 MHz to 1575 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4 points.

GeForce4 440 Go 64M
The GeForce4 440 Go 64M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 1 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is Up to 710 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 32W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce2 MX/MX 400 scores 4 versus the GeForce4 440 Go 64M's 6 — the GeForce4 440 Go 64M leads by 50%. The GeForce2 MX/MX 400 is built on Turing while the GeForce4 440 Go 64M uses Kepler, both on 12 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 896 (GeForce2 MX/MX 400) vs 384 (GeForce4 440 Go 64M). Raw compute: 3.226 TFLOPS (GeForce2 MX/MX 400) vs 0.5445 TFLOPS (GeForce4 440 Go 64M).
| Feature | GeForce2 MX/MX 400 | GeForce4 440 Go 64M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4 | 6+50% |
| Architecture | Turing | Kepler |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 896+133% | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.226 TFLOPS+492% | 0.5445 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32+100% | 16 |
| TMUs | 64+100% | 32 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce2 MX/MX 400 | GeForce4 440 Go 64M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce2 MX/MX 400 and 64-bit on the GeForce4 440 Go 64M.
| Feature | GeForce2 MX/MX 400 | GeForce4 440 Go 64M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 7.0 (GeForce2 MX/MX 400) vs 7.0 (GeForce4 440 Go 64M). OpenGL: 1.2 vs 1.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce2 MX/MX 400 | GeForce4 440 Go 64M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 7.0 | 7.0 |
| OpenGL | 1.2 | 1.5+25% |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (GeForce2 MX/MX 400) vs None (GeForce4 440 Go 64M). Decoder: MPEG-2 Decoder vs MPEG-2 VPE. Supported codecs: MPEG-2 (GeForce2 MX/MX 400) vs MPEG-2 (GeForce4 440 Go 64M).
| Feature | GeForce2 MX/MX 400 | GeForce4 440 Go 64M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | None |
| Decoder | MPEG-2 Decoder | MPEG-2 VPE |
| Codecs | MPEG-2 | MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce2 MX/MX 400 draws 25W versus the GeForce4 440 Go 64M's 32W — a 24.6% difference. The GeForce2 MX/MX 400 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce2 MX/MX 400) vs 350W (GeForce4 440 Go 64M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 55°C vs 85.
| Feature | GeForce2 MX/MX 400 | GeForce4 440 Go 64M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 25W-22% | 32W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 0mm |
| Height | 100mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 55°C-35% | 85 |
| Perf/Watt | 0.2 | 0.2 |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is GeForce2 MX/MX 400 (2020 vs 2012).
| Feature | GeForce2 MX/MX 400 | GeForce4 440 Go 64M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $129 | — |
| Codename | N17S-G5 / GP107-670-A1 | GK107 |
| Release | August 1 2020 | October 1 2012 |
| Ranking | #523 | #903 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














