GeForce2 MX/MX 400 vs GeForce4 440 Go 64M

NVIDIA

GeForce2 MX/MX 400

2020Core: 1395 MHzBoost: 1575 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce4 440 Go 64M

2012Core: Up to 710 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce2 MX/MX 400 vs GeForce4 440 Go 64M Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce2 MX/MX 400 vs GeForce4 440 Go 64M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce2 MX/MX 400 vs GeForce4 440 Go 64M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce2 MX/MX 400

2020

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($129 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • GeForce4 440 Go 64M is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GeForce2 MX/MX 400 is the less risky modern option long term.
  • Draws 25W instead of 32W, a 7W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark G3D performance (4 vs 6).
  • 2020 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.

GeForce4 440 Go 64M

2012

Why buy it

  • +50% higher PassMark G3D performance.

Trade-offs

  • 2012 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $129 MSRP).
  • 28% higher power demand at 32W vs 25W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce4 440 Go 64M is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 50% in PassMark G3D (6 vs 4), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce2 MX/MX 400 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 12nm process instead of 28nm and a newer 2020 generation instead of 2012. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce2 MX/MX 400 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. GeForce4 440 Go 64M still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GeForce2 MX/MX 400 vs GeForce4 440 Go 64M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce2 MX/MX 400

The GeForce2 MX/MX 400 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 1 2020. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1395 MHz to 1575 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4 points.

NVIDIA

GeForce4 440 Go 64M

The GeForce4 440 Go 64M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 1 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is Up to 710 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 32W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6 points.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce2 MX/MX 400 scores 4 versus the GeForce4 440 Go 64M's 6 — the GeForce4 440 Go 64M leads by 50%. The GeForce2 MX/MX 400 is built on Turing while the GeForce4 440 Go 64M uses Kepler, both on 12 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 896 (GeForce2 MX/MX 400) vs 384 (GeForce4 440 Go 64M). Raw compute: 3.226 TFLOPS (GeForce2 MX/MX 400) vs 0.5445 TFLOPS (GeForce4 440 Go 64M).

FeatureGeForce2 MX/MX 400GeForce4 440 Go 64M
G3D Mark Score
4
6+50%
Architecture
Turing
Kepler
Process Node
12 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
896+133%
384
Compute (TFLOPS)
3.226 TFLOPS+492%
0.5445 TFLOPS
ROPs
32+100%
16
TMUs
64+100%
32

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce2 MX/MX 400GeForce4 440 Go 64M
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce2 MX/MX 400 and 64-bit on the GeForce4 440 Go 64M.

FeatureGeForce2 MX/MX 400GeForce4 440 Go 64M
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
64-bit
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 7.0 (GeForce2 MX/MX 400) vs 7.0 (GeForce4 440 Go 64M). OpenGL: 1.2 vs 1.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

FeatureGeForce2 MX/MX 400GeForce4 440 Go 64M
DirectX
7.0
7.0
OpenGL
1.2
1.5+25%
Max Displays
2
2
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: None (GeForce2 MX/MX 400) vs None (GeForce4 440 Go 64M). Decoder: MPEG-2 Decoder vs MPEG-2 VPE. Supported codecs: MPEG-2 (GeForce2 MX/MX 400) vs MPEG-2 (GeForce4 440 Go 64M).

FeatureGeForce2 MX/MX 400GeForce4 440 Go 64M
Encoder
None
None
Decoder
MPEG-2 Decoder
MPEG-2 VPE
Codecs
MPEG-2
MPEG-2
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce2 MX/MX 400 draws 25W versus the GeForce4 440 Go 64M's 32W — a 24.6% difference. The GeForce2 MX/MX 400 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce2 MX/MX 400) vs 350W (GeForce4 440 Go 64M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 55°C vs 85.

FeatureGeForce2 MX/MX 400GeForce4 440 Go 64M
TDP
25W-22%
32W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
0mm
Height
100mm
0mm
Slots
1
0-100%
Temp (Load)
55°C-35%
85
Perf/Watt
0.2
0.2
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is GeForce2 MX/MX 400 (2020 vs 2012).

FeatureGeForce2 MX/MX 400GeForce4 440 Go 64M
MSRP
$129
Codename
N17S-G5 / GP107-670-A1
GK107
Release
August 1 2020
October 1 2012
Ranking
#523
#903

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.