GeForce2 MX/MX 400 vs RADEON 7500

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce2 MX/MX 400 vs RADEON 7500 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce2 MX/MX 400 vs RADEON 7500: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce2 MX/MX 400

2020

Why buy it

✅+33.3% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Costs $70 less on MSRP ($129 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
✅Delivers 105.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.0 vs 0.0 G3D/$ ($129 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
✅693.7% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 65 MB).
✅RADEON 7500 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GeForce2 MX/MX 400 is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

❌2020 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.

RADEON 7500

2017

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (3 vs 4).
❌Less VRAM, with 65 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2017 hardware with 65 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
54.3% HIGHER MSRP
$199 MSRPvs$129 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.0 vs 0.0 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs $129 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce2 MX/MX 400 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 33.3% in PassMark G3D (4 vs 3), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce2 MX/MX 400 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 512 MB vs 65 MB of VRAM, a 12nm process instead of 14nm, and a newer 2020 generation instead of 2017. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce2 MX/MX 400 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $70 cheaper on MSRP at $129 vs $199, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 105.7% (0.0 vs 0.0), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce2 MX/MX 400 vs RADEON 7500 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce2 MX/MX 400

The GeForce2 MX/MX 400 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 1 2020. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1395 MHz to 1575 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4 points.

RADEON 7500

The RADEON 7500 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 20 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1100 MHz to 1183 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3 points. Launch price was $79.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce2 MX/MX 400 scores 4 versus the RADEON 7500's 3 — the GeForce2 MX/MX 400 leads by 33.3%. The GeForce2 MX/MX 400 is built on Turing while the RADEON 7500 uses GCN 4.0, both on 12 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 896 (GeForce2 MX/MX 400) vs 512 (RADEON 7500). Raw compute: 3.226 TFLOPS (GeForce2 MX/MX 400) vs 1.211 TFLOPS (RADEON 7500). Boost clocks: 1575 MHz vs 1183 MHz.

Feature	GeForce2 MX/MX 400	RADEON 7500
G3D Mark Score	4+33%	3
Architecture	Turing	GCN 4.0
Process Node	12 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	896+75%	512
Compute (TFLOPS)	3.226 TFLOPS+166%	1.211 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1575 MHz+33%	1183 MHz
ROPs	32+100%	16
TMUs	64+100%	32

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce2 MX/MX 400 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The RADEON 7500 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce2 MX/MX 400	RADEON 7500
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce2 MX/MX 400 has 512 MB of VRAM, while the RADEON 7500 carries 65 MB. GeForce2 MX/MX 400 gives you 693.7% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce2 MX/MX 400 and 128-bit on the RADEON 7500.

Feature	GeForce2 MX/MX 400	RADEON 7500
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB+694%	0.063 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 7.0 (GeForce2 MX/MX 400) vs 8.1 (RADEON 7500). OpenGL: 1.2 vs 1.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

Feature	GeForce2 MX/MX 400	RADEON 7500
DirectX	7.0	8.1+16%
OpenGL	1.2	1.3+8%
Max Displays	2	2

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: None (GeForce2 MX/MX 400) vs Legacy (RADEON 7500). Decoder: MPEG-2 Decoder vs Legacy. Supported codecs: MPEG-2 (GeForce2 MX/MX 400) vs MPEG-1,MPEG-2 (RADEON 7500).

Feature	GeForce2 MX/MX 400	RADEON 7500
Encoder	None	Legacy
Decoder	MPEG-2 Decoder	Legacy
Codecs	MPEG-2	MPEG-1,MPEG-2

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce2 MX/MX 400 draws 25W versus the RADEON 7500's 50W — a 66.7% difference. The GeForce2 MX/MX 400 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce2 MX/MX 400) vs 350W (RADEON 7500). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy.

Feature	GeForce2 MX/MX 400	RADEON 7500
TDP	25W-50%	50W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	Legacy
Height	100mm	—
Slots	1	1
Temp (Load)	55°C	—
Perf/Watt	0.2+100%	0.1

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce2 MX/MX 400 came in at $129, while the RADEON 7500 launched at $199. On MSRP, GeForce2 MX/MX 400 was 35.2% cheaper ($70 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.0 (GeForce2 MX/MX 400) vs 0.0 (RADEON 7500) — the RADEON 7500 offers 0% better value. The newer card here is GeForce2 MX/MX 400 (2020 vs 2017).

Feature	GeForce2 MX/MX 400	RADEON 7500
MSRP	$129-35%	$199
Performance per Dollar	0.0	0.0
Codename	N17S-G5 / GP107-670-A1	Lexa
Release	August 1 2020	April 20 2017
Ranking	#523	#668

Search GeForce2 MX/MX 400 on Amazon

Search RADEON 7500 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.