GeForce2 MX/MX 400
VS
MOBILITY/RADEON 9000

GeForce2 MX/MX 400 vs MOBILITY/RADEON 9000

NVIDIA

GeForce2 MX/MX 400

2020Core: 1395 MHzBoost: 1575 MHz

Popular choices:

RTX 4060•RTX 3060•RTX 4060 Ti•RTX 3070•GTX 1650•RTX 3060 Ti•RTX 4070•RTX 3050•RX 7600•RTX 4070 Ti
VS
AMD

MOBILITY/RADEON 9000

2010Core: 700 MHz

Popular choices:

RTX 4060•RTX 3060•RTX 4060 Ti•RTX 3070•GTX 1650•RTX 3060 Ti•RTX 4070•RTX 3050•RX 7600•RTX 4070 Ti

Performance Spectrum - GPU

GeForce2 MX/MX 400
25
4
0.0%
brand logoGeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB
brand logoGeForce GTX 780 Ti
brand logoGeForce RTX 4050 Mobile
brand logoGeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
brand logoRTX 4000 Ada Generation
brand logoGeForce RTX 5070
brand logoGeForce RTX 4080 SUPER
brand logoGeForce RTX 4090
MOBILITY/RADEON 9000
10
4
0.0%
brand logoMOBILITY RADEON 9000
brand logoMOBILITY RADEON 9200
brand logoRadeon HD 7950 / R9 280
brand logoRadeon R9 Fury
brand logoRadeon RX 5700
brand logoRadeon RX 6700
brand logoRadeon RX 7800 XT
brand logoRadeon RX 7900 XT

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The GeForce2 MX/MX 400 is positioned at rank #750 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce2 MX/MX 400

#740
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
361900%
#742
GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150
328067%
#743
GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100
327200%
#747
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
297533%
#748
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
295500%
#750
GeForce2 MX/MX 400
MSRP: $129|Avg: $15
100%
#751
GeForce4 MX 440
MSRP: $149|Avg: $49
100%
#752
RADEON 7200
MSRP: $99|Avg: $45
100%
#753
GeForce 256
MSRP: $199|Avg: $20
100%
#754
GeForce2 MX
MSRP: $129|Avg: $49
67%
#755
GeForce4 440
MSRP: $469|Avg: $49
33%
#756
GeForce3
MSRP: $499|Avg: $49
33%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The GeForce2 MX/MX 400 is significantly newer (2020 vs 2010). The GeForce2 MX/MX 400 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce2 MX/MX 400.

InsightGeForce2 MX/MX 400MOBILITY/RADEON 9000
Performance
❌Lower raw frame rates (-0%)
✅Leading raw performance (+0%)
Longevity
Turing (2018−2022) (12nm)
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit
—
—

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce2 MX/MX 400 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $15 versus $49 for the MOBILITY/RADEON 9000, it costs 69% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 226.7% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightGeForce2 MX/MX 400MOBILITY/RADEON 9000
Cost Efficiency
✅Better overall value (+226.7%)
❌Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
✅More affordable ($15)
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($49)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce2 MX/MX 400 Benchmark Check

MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

1080p
low1 FPS
medium1 FPS
high1 FPS
ultra1 FPS
1440p
low1 FPS
medium1 FPS
high1 FPS
ultra1 FPS
4K
low1 FPS
medium1 FPS
high1 FPS
ultra1 FPS
Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

1080p
low1 FPS
medium1 FPS
high1 FPS
ultra1 FPS
1440p
low1 FPS
medium1 FPS
high1 FPS
ultra1 FPS
4K
low1 FPS
medium1 FPS
high1 FPS
ultra1 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

1080p
low1 FPS
medium1 FPS
high1 FPS
ultra1 FPS
1440p
low1 FPS
medium1 FPS
high1 FPS
ultra1 FPS
4K
low1 FPS
medium1 FPS
high1 FPS
ultra1 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

1080p
low1 FPS
medium1 FPS
high1 FPS
ultra1 FPS
1440p
low1 FPS
medium1 FPS
high1 FPS
ultra1 FPS
4K
low1 FPS
medium1 FPS
high1 FPS
ultra1 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

1080p
low1 FPS
medium1 FPS
high1 FPS
ultra1 FPS
1440p
low1 FPS
medium1 FPS
high1 FPS
ultra1 FPS
4K
low1 FPS
medium1 FPS
high1 FPS
ultra1 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

1080p
low1 FPS
medium1 FPS
high1 FPS
ultra1 FPS
1440p
low1 FPS
medium1 FPS
high1 FPS
ultra1 FPS
4K
low1 FPS
medium1 FPS
high1 FPS
ultra1 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

1080p
low1 FPS
medium1 FPS
high1 FPS
ultra1 FPS
1440p
low1 FPS
medium1 FPS
high1 FPS
ultra1 FPS
4K
low1 FPS
medium1 FPS
high1 FPS
ultra1 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

1080p
low1 FPS
medium1 FPS
high1 FPS
ultra1 FPS
1440p
low1 FPS
medium1 FPS
high1 FPS
ultra1 FPS
4K
low1 FPS
medium1 FPS
high1 FPS
ultra1 FPS
Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce2 MX/MX 400 and MOBILITY/RADEON 9000

NVIDIA

GeForce2 MX/MX 400

The GeForce2 MX/MX 400 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 1 2020. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1395 MHz to 1575 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4 points.

AMD

MOBILITY/RADEON 9000

The MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 10W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce2 MX/MX 400 scores 4 and the MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 reaches 4 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce2 MX/MX 400 is built on Turing while the MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 uses TeraScale 2, both on 12 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 896 (GeForce2 MX/MX 400) vs 800 (MOBILITY/RADEON 9000). Raw compute: 3.226 TFLOPS (GeForce2 MX/MX 400) vs 1.12 TFLOPS (MOBILITY/RADEON 9000).

FeatureGeForce2 MX/MX 400MOBILITY/RADEON 9000
G3D Mark Score
4
4
Architecture
Turing
TeraScale 2
Process Node
12 nm
40 nm
Shading Units
896+12%
800
Compute (TFLOPS)
3.226 TFLOPS+188%
1.12 TFLOPS
ROPs
32+100%
16
TMUs
64+60%
40
✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce2 MX/MX 400MOBILITY/RADEON 9000
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit.

FeatureGeForce2 MX/MX 400MOBILITY/RADEON 9000
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
64-bit
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 7.0 (GeForce2 MX/MX 400) vs 8.1 (MOBILITY/RADEON 9000). OpenGL: 1.2 vs 1.4. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

FeatureGeForce2 MX/MX 400MOBILITY/RADEON 9000
DirectX
7.0
8.1+16%
OpenGL
1.2
1.4+17%
Max Displays
2
2
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: None (GeForce2 MX/MX 400) vs N/A (MOBILITY/RADEON 9000). Decoder: MPEG-2 Decoder vs MPEG-2. Supported codecs: MPEG-2 (GeForce2 MX/MX 400) vs MPEG-2 (MOBILITY/RADEON 9000).

FeatureGeForce2 MX/MX 400MOBILITY/RADEON 9000
Encoder
None
N/A
Decoder
MPEG-2 Decoder
MPEG-2
Codecs
MPEG-2
MPEG-2
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce2 MX/MX 400 draws 25W versus the MOBILITY/RADEON 9000's 10W — a 85.7% difference. The MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce2 MX/MX 400) vs 0W (MOBILITY/RADEON 9000). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None. Typical load temperature: 55°C vs 70.

FeatureGeForce2 MX/MX 400MOBILITY/RADEON 9000
TDP
25W
10W-60%
Recommended PSU
350W
0W-100%
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
None
Length
—
0mm
Height
100mm
0mm
Slots
1
0-100%
Temp (Load)
55°C-21%
70
Perf/Watt
0.2
0.4+100%
💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce2 MX/MX 400 launched at $129 MSRP and currently averages $15, while the MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 launched at $0 and now averages $49. The GeForce2 MX/MX 400 costs 69.4% less ($34 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 0.3 (GeForce2 MX/MX 400) vs 0.1 (MOBILITY/RADEON 9000) — the GeForce2 MX/MX 400 offers 200% better value. The GeForce2 MX/MX 400 is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2010).

FeatureGeForce2 MX/MX 400MOBILITY/RADEON 9000
MSRP
$129
$0-100%
Avg Price (30d)
$15-69%
$49
Performance per Dollar
0.3+200%
0.1
Codename
N17S-G5 / GP107-670-A1
Broadway
Release
August 1 2020
January 7 2010
Ranking
#523
#846