GeForce2 MX/MX 400 vs MOBILITY RADEON 7000 IGP
GeForce2 MX/MX 400
Popular choices:
MOBILITY RADEON 7000 IGP
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce2 MX/MX 400 is positioned at rank 750 and the MOBILITY RADEON 7000 IGP is on rank 732, so the MOBILITY RADEON 7000 IGP offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce2 MX/MX 400
Performance Per Dollar MOBILITY RADEON 7000 IGP
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce2 MX/MX 400 is significantly newer (2020 vs 2010). The GeForce2 MX/MX 400 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The MOBILITY RADEON 7000 IGP lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The MOBILITY RADEON 7000 IGP is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 50% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce2 MX/MX 400.
| Insight | GeForce2 MX/MX 400 | MOBILITY RADEON 7000 IGP |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-50%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+50%) |
| Longevity | Turing (2018−2022) (12nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The MOBILITY RADEON 7000 IGP offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $5 versus $15 for the GeForce2 MX/MX 400, it costs 67% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 350% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce2 MX/MX 400 | MOBILITY RADEON 7000 IGP |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+350%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($15) | ✅More affordable ($5) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce2 MX/MX 400 and MOBILITY RADEON 7000 IGP
GeForce2 MX/MX 400
The GeForce2 MX/MX 400 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 1 2020. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1395 MHz to 1575 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4 points.
MOBILITY RADEON 7000 IGP
The MOBILITY RADEON 7000 IGP is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce2 MX/MX 400 scores 4 versus the MOBILITY RADEON 7000 IGP's 6 — the MOBILITY RADEON 7000 IGP leads by 50%. The GeForce2 MX/MX 400 is built on Turing while the MOBILITY RADEON 7000 IGP uses TeraScale 2, both on 12 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 896 (GeForce2 MX/MX 400) vs 800 (MOBILITY RADEON 7000 IGP). Raw compute: 3.226 TFLOPS (GeForce2 MX/MX 400) vs 1.12 TFLOPS (MOBILITY RADEON 7000 IGP).
| Feature | GeForce2 MX/MX 400 | MOBILITY RADEON 7000 IGP |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4 | 6+50% |
| Architecture | Turing | TeraScale 2 |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 896+12% | 800 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.226 TFLOPS+188% | 1.12 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32+100% | 16 |
| TMUs | 64+60% | 40 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce2 MX/MX 400 | MOBILITY RADEON 7000 IGP |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | GeForce2 MX/MX 400 | MOBILITY RADEON 7000 IGP |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 7.0 (GeForce2 MX/MX 400) vs 7.0 (MOBILITY RADEON 7000 IGP). OpenGL: 1.2 vs 1.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce2 MX/MX 400 | MOBILITY RADEON 7000 IGP |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 7.0 | 7.0 |
| OpenGL | 1.2 | 1.3+8% |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce2 MX/MX 400 draws 25W versus the MOBILITY RADEON 7000 IGP's 50W — a 66.7% difference. The GeForce2 MX/MX 400 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce2 MX/MX 400) vs 350W (MOBILITY RADEON 7000 IGP). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 55°C vs 70°C.
| Feature | GeForce2 MX/MX 400 | MOBILITY RADEON 7000 IGP |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 25W-50% | 50W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Height | 100mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 55°C-21% | 70°C |
| Perf/Watt | 0.2+100% | 0.1 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce2 MX/MX 400 launched at $129 MSRP and currently averages $15, while the MOBILITY RADEON 7000 IGP launched at $20 and now averages $5. The MOBILITY RADEON 7000 IGP costs 66.7% less ($10 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 0.3 (GeForce2 MX/MX 400) vs 1.2 (MOBILITY RADEON 7000 IGP) — the MOBILITY RADEON 7000 IGP offers 300% better value. The GeForce2 MX/MX 400 is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2010).
| Feature | GeForce2 MX/MX 400 | MOBILITY RADEON 7000 IGP |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $129 | $20-84% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $15 | $5-67% |
| Performance per Dollar | 0.3 | 1.2+300% |
| Codename | N17S-G5 / GP107-670-A1 | Broadway |
| Release | August 1 2020 | January 7 2010 |
| Ranking | #523 | #846 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce2 MX/MX 400 and MOBILITY RADEON 7000 IGP
