GeForce2 MX/MX 400 vs Radeon IGP 340M

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce2 MX/MX 400 vs Radeon IGP 340M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce2 MX/MX 400 vs Radeon IGP 340M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce2 MX/MX 400

2020

Why buy it

✅+33.3% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($129 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Radeon IGP 340M is already legacy-tier future-proofing, so GeForce2 MX/MX 400 is the less risky modern option long term.
✅Draws 25W instead of 230W, a 205W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌2020 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.

Radeon IGP 340M

2018

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (3 vs 4).
❌2018 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $129 MSRP).
❌820% higher power demand at 230W vs 25W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce2 MX/MX 400 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 33.3% in PassMark G3D (4 vs 3), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce2 MX/MX 400 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 12nm process instead of 14nm and a newer 2020 generation instead of 2018. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce2 MX/MX 400 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

GeForce2 MX/MX 400 vs Radeon IGP 340M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce2 MX/MX 400

The GeForce2 MX/MX 400 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 1 2020. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1395 MHz to 1575 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4 points.

Radeon IGP 340M

The Radeon IGP 340M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 26 2018. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 852 MHz to 1500 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 230W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce2 MX/MX 400 scores 4 versus the Radeon IGP 340M's 3 — the GeForce2 MX/MX 400 leads by 33.3%. The GeForce2 MX/MX 400 is built on Turing while the Radeon IGP 340M uses GCN 5.0, both on 12 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 896 (GeForce2 MX/MX 400) vs 3,584 (Radeon IGP 340M). Raw compute: 3.226 TFLOPS (GeForce2 MX/MX 400) vs 10.75 TFLOPS (Radeon IGP 340M). Boost clocks: 1575 MHz vs 1500 MHz.

Feature	GeForce2 MX/MX 400	Radeon IGP 340M
G3D Mark Score	4+33%	3
Architecture	Turing	GCN 5.0
Process Node	12 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	896	3584+300%
Compute (TFLOPS)	3.226 TFLOPS	10.75 TFLOPS+233%
Boost Clock	1575 MHz+5%	1500 MHz
ROPs	32	64+100%
TMUs	64	224+250%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce2 MX/MX 400 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon IGP 340M leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce2 MX/MX 400	Radeon IGP 340M
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce2 MX/MX 400 and 64-bit on the Radeon IGP 340M.

Feature	GeForce2 MX/MX 400	Radeon IGP 340M
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce2 MX/MX 400 draws 25W versus the Radeon IGP 340M's 230W — a 160.8% difference. The GeForce2 MX/MX 400 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce2 MX/MX 400) vs 350W (Radeon IGP 340M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	GeForce2 MX/MX 400	Radeon IGP 340M
TDP	25W-89%	230W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Height	100mm	—
Slots	1	—
Temp (Load)	55°C	—
Perf/Watt	0.2	0.0

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is GeForce2 MX/MX 400 (2020 vs 2018).

Feature	GeForce2 MX/MX 400	Radeon IGP 340M
MSRP	$129	—
Codename	N17S-G5 / GP107-670-A1	Vega 10
Release	August 1 2020	August 26 2018
Ranking	#523	#593

Search GeForce2 MX/MX 400 on Amazon

Search Radeon IGP 340M on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.