GeForce2 MX/MX 400 vs RADEON 9000

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce2 MX/MX 400 vs RADEON 9000 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce2 MX/MX 400 vs RADEON 9000: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce2 MX/MX 400

2020

Why buy it

✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 128 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (4 vs 5).
❌2020 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
❌
163.3% HIGHER MSRP
$129 MSRPvs$49 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.0 vs 0.1 G3D/$ ($129 MSRP vs $49 MSRP).
❌66.7% higher power demand at 25W vs 15W.

RADEON 9000

2024

Why buy it

✅+25% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Costs $80 less on MSRP ($49 MSRP vs $129 MSRP).
✅Delivers 229.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.1 vs 0.0 G3D/$ ($49 MSRP vs $129 MSRP).
✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025) on 4nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
✅Draws 15W instead of 25W, a 10W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 128 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

RADEON 9000 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 25% in PassMark G3D (5 vs 4), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

RADEON 9000 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 4nm process instead of 12nm, 16 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2024 generation instead of 2020. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

RADEON 9000 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $80 cheaper on MSRP at $49 vs $129, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 229.1% (0.1 vs 0.0), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce2 MX/MX 400 vs RADEON 9000 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce2 MX/MX 400

The GeForce2 MX/MX 400 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 1 2020. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1395 MHz to 1575 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4 points.

RADEON 9000

The RADEON 9000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 15 2024. It features the RDNA 3.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 400 MHz to 2900 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce2 MX/MX 400 scores 4 versus the RADEON 9000's 5 — the RADEON 9000 leads by 25%. The GeForce2 MX/MX 400 is built on Turing while the RADEON 9000 uses RDNA 3.5, both on 12 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 896 (GeForce2 MX/MX 400) vs 1,024 (RADEON 9000). Raw compute: 3.226 TFLOPS (GeForce2 MX/MX 400) vs 5.939 TFLOPS (RADEON 9000). Boost clocks: 1575 MHz vs 2900 MHz.

Feature	GeForce2 MX/MX 400	RADEON 9000
G3D Mark Score	4	5+25%
Architecture	Turing	RDNA 3.5
Process Node	12 nm	4 nm
Shading Units	896	1024+14%
Compute (TFLOPS)	3.226 TFLOPS	5.939 TFLOPS+84%
Boost Clock	1575 MHz	2900 MHz+84%
ROPs	32	32
TMUs	64	64

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce2 MX/MX 400 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The RADEON 9000 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce2 MX/MX 400	RADEON 9000
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce2 MX/MX 400 has 512 MB of VRAM, while the RADEON 9000 carries 128 MB. GeForce2 MX/MX 400 gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce2 MX/MX 400 and 64-bit on the RADEON 9000.

Feature	GeForce2 MX/MX 400	RADEON 9000
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB+300%	0.125 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce2 MX/MX 400 draws 25W versus the RADEON 9000's 15W — a 50% difference. The RADEON 9000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce2 MX/MX 400) vs 350W (RADEON 9000). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy.

Feature	GeForce2 MX/MX 400	RADEON 9000
TDP	25W	15W-40%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	Legacy
Height	100mm	—
Slots	1	—
Temp (Load)	55°C	—
Perf/Watt	0.2	0.3+50%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce2 MX/MX 400 came in at $129, while the RADEON 9000 launched at $49. On MSRP, RADEON 9000 was 62% cheaper ($80 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.0 (GeForce2 MX/MX 400) vs 0.1 (RADEON 9000) — the RADEON 9000 offers 100+% better value. The newer card here is RADEON 9000 (2024 vs 2020).

Feature	GeForce2 MX/MX 400	RADEON 9000
MSRP	$129	$49-62%
Performance per Dollar	0.0	0.1
Codename	N17S-G5 / GP107-670-A1	Strix Point
Release	August 1 2020	July 15 2024
Ranking	#523	#312

Search GeForce2 MX/MX 400 on Amazon

Search RADEON 9000 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.