GeForce2 MX/MX 400
RADEON 9200 SE
GeForce2 MX/MX 400 vs RADEON 9200 SE Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce2 MX/MX 400 vs RADEON 9200 SE FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce2 MX/MX 400 vs RADEON 9200 SE: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce2 MX/MX 400
2020Why buy it
- ✅+33.3% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 256 MB).
- ✅Draws 25W instead of 55W, a 30W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌2020 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
- ❌330% HIGHER MSRP$129 MSRPvs$30 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.0 vs 0.1 G3D/$ ($129 MSRP vs $30 MSRP).
RADEON 9200 SE
2025Why buy it
- ✅Costs $99 less on MSRP ($30 MSRP vs $129 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 222.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.1 vs 0.0 G3D/$ ($30 MSRP vs $129 MSRP).
- ✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025) on 4nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (3 vs 4).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 256 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌120% higher power demand at 55W vs 25W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce2 MX/MX 400 vs RADEON 9200 SE Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
GeForce2 MX/MX 400
The GeForce2 MX/MX 400 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 1 2020. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1395 MHz to 1575 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4 points.
RADEON 9200 SE
The RADEON 9200 SE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 6 2025. It features the RDNA 3.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1295 MHz to 2900 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 40 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce2 MX/MX 400 scores 4 versus the RADEON 9200 SE's 3 — the GeForce2 MX/MX 400 leads by 33.3%. The GeForce2 MX/MX 400 is built on Turing while the RADEON 9200 SE uses RDNA 3.5, both on 12 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 896 (GeForce2 MX/MX 400) vs 2,560 (RADEON 9200 SE). Raw compute: 3.226 TFLOPS (GeForce2 MX/MX 400) vs 14.85 TFLOPS (RADEON 9200 SE). Boost clocks: 1575 MHz vs 2900 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce2 MX/MX 400 | RADEON 9200 SE |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4+33% | 3 |
| Architecture | Turing | RDNA 3.5 |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 4 nm |
| Shading Units | 896 | 2560+186% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.226 TFLOPS | 14.85 TFLOPS+360% |
| Boost Clock | 1575 MHz | 2900 MHz+84% |
| ROPs | 32 | 64+100% |
| TMUs | 64 | 160+150% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce2 MX/MX 400 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The RADEON 9200 SE leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce2 MX/MX 400 | RADEON 9200 SE |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce2 MX/MX 400 has 512 MB of VRAM, while the RADEON 9200 SE carries 256 MB. GeForce2 MX/MX 400 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce2 MX/MX 400 and 64-bit on the RADEON 9200 SE.
| Feature | GeForce2 MX/MX 400 | RADEON 9200 SE |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB+100% | 0.25 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 7.0 (GeForce2 MX/MX 400) vs 8.1 (RADEON 9200 SE). OpenGL: 1.2 vs 1.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce2 MX/MX 400 | RADEON 9200 SE |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 7.0 | 8.1+16% |
| OpenGL | 1.2 | 1.3+8% |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (GeForce2 MX/MX 400) vs None (RADEON 9200 SE). Decoder: MPEG-2 Decoder vs None. Supported codecs: MPEG-2 (GeForce2 MX/MX 400) vs MPEG-2 (RADEON 9200 SE).
| Feature | GeForce2 MX/MX 400 | RADEON 9200 SE |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | None |
| Decoder | MPEG-2 Decoder | None |
| Codecs | MPEG-2 | MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce2 MX/MX 400 draws 25W versus the RADEON 9200 SE's 55W — a 75% difference. The GeForce2 MX/MX 400 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce2 MX/MX 400) vs 350W (RADEON 9200 SE). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy. Typical load temperature: 55°C vs 60.
| Feature | GeForce2 MX/MX 400 | RADEON 9200 SE |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 25W-55% | 55W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Legacy |
| Length | — | 168mm |
| Height | 100mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 1 | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 55°C-8% | 60 |
| Perf/Watt | 0.2+100% | 0.1 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce2 MX/MX 400 came in at $129, while the RADEON 9200 SE launched at $30. On MSRP, RADEON 9200 SE was 76.7% cheaper ($99 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.0 (GeForce2 MX/MX 400) vs 0.1 (RADEON 9200 SE) — the RADEON 9200 SE offers 100+% better value. The newer card here is RADEON 9200 SE (2025 vs 2020).
| Feature | GeForce2 MX/MX 400 | RADEON 9200 SE |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $129 | $30-77% |
| Performance per Dollar | 0.0 | 0.1 |
| Codename | N17S-G5 / GP107-670-A1 | Strix Halo |
| Release | August 1 2020 | January 6 2025 |
| Ranking | #523 | #98 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce2 MX/MX 400 and RADEON 9200 SE
