GeForce2 MX/MX 400 vs MOBILITY RADEON 9200

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce2 MX/MX 400 is positioned at rank 750 and the MOBILITY RADEON 9200 is on rank 745, so the MOBILITY RADEON 9200 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce2 MX/MX 400

#740

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

361900%

#742

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

328067%

#743

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

327200%

#747

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

297533%

#748

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

295500%

#750

GeForce2 MX/MX 400

MSRP: $129|Avg: $15

100%

#751

GeForce4 MX 440

MSRP: $149|Avg: $49

100%

#752

RADEON 7200

MSRP: $99|Avg: $45

100%

#753

GeForce 256

MSRP: $199|Avg: $20

100%

#754

GeForce2 MX

MSRP: $129|Avg: $49

67%

#755

GeForce4 440

MSRP: $469|Avg: $49

33%

#756

GeForce3

MSRP: $499|Avg: $49

33%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar MOBILITY RADEON 9200

#735

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

180950%

#737

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

164033%

#738

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

163600%

#742

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

148767%

#743

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

147750%

#745

MOBILITY RADEON 9200

MSRP: $49|Avg: $15

100%

#746

MOBILITY RADEON 9000

MSRP: $50|Avg: $5

100%

#747

GeForce4 MX 420

MSRP: $99|Avg: $10

83%

#748

RADEON 9250

MSRP: $79|Avg: $25

67%

#749

RADEON 9200

MSRP: $99|Avg: $25

67%

#750

GeForce 256

MSRP: $199|Avg: $20

50%

#751

RADEON 7200

MSRP: $99|Avg: $45

50%

#752

GeForce4 MX 440

MSRP: $149|Avg: $49

50%

#753

GeForce2 MX/MX 400

MSRP: $129|Avg: $15

50%

#754

GeForce2 MX

MSRP: $129|Avg: $49

33%

#755

GeForce4 440

MSRP: $469|Avg: $49

17%

#756

GeForce3

MSRP: $499|Avg: $49

17%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The GeForce2 MX/MX 400 is significantly newer (2020 vs 2010). The GeForce2 MX/MX 400 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The MOBILITY RADEON 9200 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce2 MX/MX 400 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 33.3% higher G3D Mark score and 693.7% more VRAM (512 MB vs 65 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the MOBILITY RADEON 9200.

Insight	GeForce2 MX/MX 400	MOBILITY RADEON 9200
Performance	✅Leading raw performance (+33.3%)	❌Lower raw frame rates (-33.3%)
Longevity	Turing (2018−2022) (12nm)	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	✅ More VRAM (+693.7%)	❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit	—	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce2 MX/MX 400 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $15 (vs $15), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 33.3% better value per dollar than the MOBILITY RADEON 9200.

Insight	GeForce2 MX/MX 400	MOBILITY RADEON 9200
Cost Efficiency	✅Better overall value (+33.3%)	❌Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost	Equivalent pricing	Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce2 MX/MX 400 Benchmark Check

MOBILITY RADEON 9200 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce2 MX/MX 400 and MOBILITY RADEON 9200

GeForce2 MX/MX 400

The GeForce2 MX/MX 400 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 1 2020. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1395 MHz to 1575 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4 points.

MOBILITY RADEON 9200

The MOBILITY RADEON 9200 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce2 MX/MX 400 scores 4 versus the MOBILITY RADEON 9200's 3 — the GeForce2 MX/MX 400 leads by 33.3%. The GeForce2 MX/MX 400 is built on Turing while the MOBILITY RADEON 9200 uses TeraScale 2, both on 12 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 896 (GeForce2 MX/MX 400) vs 800 (MOBILITY RADEON 9200). Raw compute: 3.226 TFLOPS (GeForce2 MX/MX 400) vs 1.12 TFLOPS (MOBILITY RADEON 9200).

Feature	GeForce2 MX/MX 400	MOBILITY RADEON 9200
G3D Mark Score	4+33%	3
Architecture	Turing	TeraScale 2
Process Node	12 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	896+12%	800
Compute (TFLOPS)	3.226 TFLOPS+188%	1.12 TFLOPS
ROPs	32+100%	16
TMUs	64+60%	40

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce2 MX/MX 400	MOBILITY RADEON 9200
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce2 MX/MX 400 comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the MOBILITY RADEON 9200 has 65 MB. The GeForce2 MX/MX 400 offers 693.7% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit.

Feature	GeForce2 MX/MX 400	MOBILITY RADEON 9200
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB+694%	0.063 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 7.0 (GeForce2 MX/MX 400) vs 8.1 (MOBILITY RADEON 9200). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 0.

Feature	GeForce2 MX/MX 400	MOBILITY RADEON 9200
DirectX	7.0	8.1+16%
Max Displays	2	0

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce2 MX/MX 400 draws 25W versus the MOBILITY RADEON 9200's 50W — a 66.7% difference. The GeForce2 MX/MX 400 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce2 MX/MX 400) vs 350W (MOBILITY RADEON 9200). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	GeForce2 MX/MX 400	MOBILITY RADEON 9200
TDP	25W-50%	50W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	—	1mm
Height	100mm	—
Slots	1	0-100%
Temp (Load)	55°C	—
Perf/Watt	0.2+100%	0.1

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce2 MX/MX 400 launched at $129 MSRP and currently averages $15, while the MOBILITY RADEON 9200 launched at $49 and now averages $15. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 0.3 (GeForce2 MX/MX 400) vs 0.2 (MOBILITY RADEON 9200) — the GeForce2 MX/MX 400 offers 50% better value. The GeForce2 MX/MX 400 is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2010).

Feature	GeForce2 MX/MX 400	MOBILITY RADEON 9200
MSRP	$129	$49-62%
Avg Price (30d)	$15	$15
Performance per Dollar	0.3+50%	0.2
Codename	N17S-G5 / GP107-670-A1	Broadway
Release	August 1 2020	January 7 2010
Ranking	#523	#846