GeForce3 Ti 500 vs Radeon VE

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce3 Ti 500 vs Radeon VE FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce3 Ti 500 vs Radeon VE: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce3 Ti 500

2025

Why buy it

✅+50% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Better long-term bet: Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌94.9% higher power demand at 575W vs 295W.
❌10.9% longer card at 183mm vs 165mm.

Radeon VE

2019

Why buy it

✅Draws 295W instead of 575W, a 280W reduction.
✅Measures 165mm instead of 183mm, a 18mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (2 vs 3).
❌Older hardware, 512 MB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $349 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce3 Ti 500 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 50% in PassMark G3D (3 vs 2), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce3 Ti 500 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 5nm process instead of 7nm, 170 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2025 generation instead of 2019. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce3 Ti 500 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

GeForce3 Ti 500 vs Radeon VE Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce3 Ti 500

The GeForce3 Ti 500 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 30 2025. It features the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2017 MHz to 2407 MHz. It has 21760 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 575W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 170 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3 points. Launch price was $1,999.

Radeon VE

The Radeon VE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in February 7 2019. It features the GCN 5.1 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1400 MHz to 1750 MHz. It has 3840 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 295W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2 points. Launch price was $699.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce3 Ti 500 scores 3 versus the Radeon VE's 2 — the GeForce3 Ti 500 leads by 50%. The GeForce3 Ti 500 is built on Blackwell 2.0 while the Radeon VE uses GCN 5.1, both on 5 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 21,760 (GeForce3 Ti 500) vs 3,840 (Radeon VE). Raw compute: 104.8 TFLOPS (GeForce3 Ti 500) vs 13.44 TFLOPS (Radeon VE). Boost clocks: 2407 MHz vs 1750 MHz.

Feature	GeForce3 Ti 500	Radeon VE
G3D Mark Score	3+50%	2
Architecture	Blackwell 2.0	GCN 5.1
Process Node	5 nm	7 nm
Shading Units	21760+467%	3840
Compute (TFLOPS)	104.8 TFLOPS+680%	13.44 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	2407 MHz+38%	1750 MHz
ROPs	176+175%	64
TMUs	680+183%	240
L1 Cache	21.3 MB+2166%	0.94 MB
L2 Cache	96 MB+2300%	4 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce3 Ti 500 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon VE leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce3 Ti 500	Radeon VE
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce3 Ti 500 and 64-bit on the Radeon VE. L2 Cache: 96 MB (GeForce3 Ti 500) vs 4 MB (Radeon VE) — the GeForce3 Ti 500 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce3 Ti 500	Radeon VE
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	96 MB+2300%	4 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 8.1 (GeForce3 Ti 500) vs 7_0 (Radeon VE). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

Feature	GeForce3 Ti 500	Radeon VE
DirectX	8.1+16%	7_0
Max Displays	2	2

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce3 Ti 500 draws 575W versus the Radeon VE's 295W — a 64.4% difference. The Radeon VE is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce3 Ti 500) vs 350W (Radeon VE). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 183mm vs 165mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots.

Feature	GeForce3 Ti 500	Radeon VE
TDP	575W	295W-49%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	183mm	165mm
Height	0mm	—
Slots	1	1
Temp (Load)	80	—
Perf/Watt	0.0	0.0

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce3 Ti 500 came in at $349, while the Radeon VE launched at $0. On MSRP, Radeon VE was 100+% cheaper ($349 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.0 (GeForce3 Ti 500) vs Infinity (Radeon VE) — the Radeon VE offers 100+% better value. The newer card here is GeForce3 Ti 500 (2025 vs 2019).

Feature	GeForce3 Ti 500	Radeon VE
MSRP	$349	$0-100%
Performance per Dollar	0.0	Infinity
Codename	GB202	Vega 20
Release	January 30 2025	February 7 2019
Ranking	#3	#125

Search GeForce3 Ti 500 on Amazon

Search Radeon VE on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.