
GeForce3 Ti 500

RADEON IGP 320
GeForce3 Ti 500 vs RADEON IGP 320 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce3 Ti 500 vs RADEON IGP 320 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce3 Ti 500 vs RADEON IGP 320: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce3 Ti 500
2025Why buy it
- ✅Better long-term bet: Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
- ✅More future proof: Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (3 vs 4).
- ❌249% HIGHER MSRP$349 MSRPvs$100 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.0 vs 0.0 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
- ❌91.7% higher power demand at 575W vs 300W.
RADEON IGP 320
2021Why buy it
- ✅+33.3% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $249 less on MSRP ($100 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 365.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.0 vs 0.0 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 300W instead of 575W, a 275W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Older hardware, 512 MB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce3 Ti 500 vs RADEON IGP 320 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce3 Ti 500
The GeForce3 Ti 500 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 30 2025. It features the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2017 MHz to 2407 MHz. It has 21760 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 575W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 170 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3 points. Launch price was $1,999.

RADEON IGP 320
The RADEON IGP 320 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 4 2021. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1825 MHz to 2200 MHz. It has 4608 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 72 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce3 Ti 500 scores 3 versus the RADEON IGP 320's 4 — the RADEON IGP 320 leads by 33.3%. The GeForce3 Ti 500 is built on Blackwell 2.0 while the RADEON IGP 320 uses RDNA 2.0, both on 5 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 21,760 (GeForce3 Ti 500) vs 4,608 (RADEON IGP 320). Raw compute: 104.8 TFLOPS (GeForce3 Ti 500) vs 20.28 TFLOPS (RADEON IGP 320). Boost clocks: 2407 MHz vs 2200 MHz. Ray tracing: 170 RT cores (GeForce3 Ti 500) vs 72 (RADEON IGP 320) with 680 Tensor cores.
| Feature | GeForce3 Ti 500 | RADEON IGP 320 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3 | 4+33% |
| Architecture | Blackwell 2.0 | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 21760+372% | 4608 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 104.8 TFLOPS+417% | 20.28 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2407 MHz+9% | 2200 MHz |
| ROPs | 176+38% | 128 |
| TMUs | 680+136% | 288 |
| L1 Cache | 21.3 MB+2030% | 1 MB |
| L2 Cache | 96 MB+2300% | 4 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 170+136% | 72 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce3 Ti 500 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The RADEON IGP 320 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce3 Ti 500 | RADEON IGP 320 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce3 Ti 500 and 64-bit on the RADEON IGP 320. L2 Cache: 96 MB (GeForce3 Ti 500) vs 4 MB (RADEON IGP 320) — the GeForce3 Ti 500 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce3 Ti 500 | RADEON IGP 320 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 96 MB+2300% | 4 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce3 Ti 500 draws 575W versus the RADEON IGP 320's 300W — a 62.9% difference. The RADEON IGP 320 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce3 Ti 500) vs 350W (RADEON IGP 320). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy.
| Feature | GeForce3 Ti 500 | RADEON IGP 320 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 575W | 300W-48% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Legacy |
| Length | 183mm | — |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 80 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 0.0 | 0.0 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce3 Ti 500 came in at $349, while the RADEON IGP 320 launched at $100. On MSRP, RADEON IGP 320 was 71.3% cheaper ($249 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.0 (GeForce3 Ti 500) vs 0.0 (RADEON IGP 320) — the RADEON IGP 320 offers 0% better value. The newer card here is GeForce3 Ti 500 (2025 vs 2021).
| Feature | GeForce3 Ti 500 | RADEON IGP 320 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $349 | $100-71% |
| Performance per Dollar | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Codename | GB202 | Navi 21 |
| Release | January 30 2025 | November 4 2021 |
| Ranking | #3 | #136 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














