GeForce3 Ti 500 vs Radeon IGP 320M

NVIDIA

GeForce3 Ti 500

2025Core: 2017 MHzBoost: 2407 MHz
Similar parts
·····
VS
AMD

Radeon IGP 320M

2019Core: 1000 MHzBoost: 1250 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce3 Ti 500 vs Radeon IGP 320M Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce3 Ti 500 vs Radeon IGP 320M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce3 Ti 500 vs Radeon IGP 320M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce3 Ti 500

2025

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • Better long-term bet: Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
  • More future proof: Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark G3D performance (3 vs 4).
  • 576.5% higher power demand at 575W vs 85W.

Radeon IGP 320M

2019

Why buy it

  • +33.3% higher PassMark G3D performance.
  • Draws 85W instead of 575W, a 490W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Older hardware, 512 MB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $349 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon IGP 320M is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 33.3% in PassMark G3D (4 vs 3), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce3 Ti 500 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 5nm process instead of 7nm, 170 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2025 generation instead of 2019. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce3 Ti 500 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. Radeon IGP 320M still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GeForce3 Ti 500 vs Radeon IGP 320M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce3 Ti 500

The GeForce3 Ti 500 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 30 2025. It features the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2017 MHz to 2407 MHz. It has 21760 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 575W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 170 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3 points. Launch price was $1,999.

AMD

Radeon IGP 320M

The Radeon IGP 320M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 13 2019. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1250 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 85W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4 points.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce3 Ti 500 scores 3 versus the Radeon IGP 320M's 4 — the Radeon IGP 320M leads by 33.3%. The GeForce3 Ti 500 is built on Blackwell 2.0 while the Radeon IGP 320M uses RDNA 1.0, both on 5 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 21,760 (GeForce3 Ti 500) vs 1,280 (Radeon IGP 320M). Raw compute: 104.8 TFLOPS (GeForce3 Ti 500) vs 3.2 TFLOPS (Radeon IGP 320M). Boost clocks: 2407 MHz vs 1250 MHz.

FeatureGeForce3 Ti 500Radeon IGP 320M
G3D Mark Score
3
4+33%
Architecture
Blackwell 2.0
RDNA 1.0
Process Node
5 nm
7 nm
Shading Units
21760+1600%
1280
Compute (TFLOPS)
104.8 TFLOPS+3175%
3.2 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
2407 MHz+93%
1250 MHz
ROPs
176+450%
32
TMUs
680+750%
80
L2 Cache
96 MB+4700%
2 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce3 Ti 500 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon IGP 320M leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce3 Ti 500Radeon IGP 320M
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce3 Ti 500 and 64-bit on the Radeon IGP 320M. L2 Cache: 96 MB (GeForce3 Ti 500) vs 2 MB (Radeon IGP 320M) — the GeForce3 Ti 500 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce3 Ti 500Radeon IGP 320M
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
64-bit
L2 Cache
96 MB+4700%
2 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

FeatureGeForce3 Ti 500Radeon IGP 320M
Max Displays
2
2
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: None (GeForce3 Ti 500) vs None (Radeon IGP 320M). Decoder: MPEG-2 vs None. Supported codecs: MPEG-2 (GeForce3 Ti 500) vs MPEG-2 (Radeon IGP 320M).

FeatureGeForce3 Ti 500Radeon IGP 320M
Encoder
None
None
Decoder
MPEG-2
None
Codecs
MPEG-2
MPEG-2
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce3 Ti 500 draws 575W versus the Radeon IGP 320M's 85W — a 148.5% difference. The Radeon IGP 320M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce3 Ti 500) vs 350W (Radeon IGP 320M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureGeForce3 Ti 500Radeon IGP 320M
TDP
575W
85W-85%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
183mm
Height
0mm
Slots
1
0-100%
Temp (Load)
80
Perf/Watt
0.0
0.0
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is GeForce3 Ti 500 (2025 vs 2019).

FeatureGeForce3 Ti 500Radeon IGP 320M
MSRP
$349
Codename
GB202
Navi 14
Release
January 30 2025
November 13 2019
Ranking
#3
#403

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.