
GeForce3

Radeon IGP 320M
GeForce3 vs Radeon IGP 320M Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce3 vs Radeon IGP 320M FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce3 vs Radeon IGP 320M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce3
2015Why buy it
- β +25% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- β Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- β Draws 33W instead of 85W, a 52W reduction.
Trade-offs
- βLess VRAM, with 65 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- β2015 hardware with 65 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Radeon IGP 320M
2019Why buy it
- β 693.7% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 65 MB).
- β GeForce3 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon IGP 320M is the less risky modern option long term.
- β More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019β2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- βLower PassMark G3D performance (4 vs 5).
- βOlder hardware, 512 MB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
- βLower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
- β157.6% higher power demand at 85W vs 33W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce3 vs Radeon IGP 320M Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce3
The GeForce3 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 928 MHz to 941 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5 points.

Radeon IGP 320M
The Radeon IGP 320M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 13 2019. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1250 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 85W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce3 scores 5 versus the Radeon IGP 320M's 4 β the GeForce3 leads by 25%. The GeForce3 is built on Maxwell while the Radeon IGP 320M uses RDNA 1.0, both on 28 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce3) vs 1,280 (Radeon IGP 320M). Raw compute: 0.7227 TFLOPS (GeForce3) vs 3.2 TFLOPS (Radeon IGP 320M). Boost clocks: 941 MHz vs 1250 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce3 | Radeon IGP 320M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5+25% | 4 |
| Architecture | Maxwell | RDNA 1.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 1280+233% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.7227 TFLOPS | 3.2 TFLOPS+343% |
| Boost Clock | 941 MHz | 1250 MHz+33% |
| ROPs | 8 | 32+300% |
| TMUs | 24 | 80+233% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 2 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce3 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon IGP 320M leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce3 | Radeon IGP 320M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce3 has 65 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon IGP 320M carries 512 MB. Radeon IGP 320M gives you 693.7% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce3 and 64-bit on the Radeon IGP 320M. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce3) vs 2 MB (Radeon IGP 320M) β the Radeon IGP 320M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce3 | Radeon IGP 320M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.063 GB | 0.5 GB+694% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 2 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce3 | Radeon IGP 320M |
|---|---|---|
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (GeForce3) vs None (Radeon IGP 320M). Decoder: None vs None. Supported codecs: MPEG-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce3) vs MPEG-2 (Radeon IGP 320M).
| Feature | GeForce3 | Radeon IGP 320M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | None |
| Decoder | None | None |
| Codecs | MPEG-1,MPEG-2 | MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce3 draws 33W versus the Radeon IGP 320M's 85W β a 88.1% difference. The GeForce3 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce3) vs 350W (Radeon IGP 320M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce3 | Radeon IGP 320M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 33W-61% | 85W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 165mm | β |
| Height | 100mm | β |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 85 | β |
| Perf/Watt | 0.2 | 0.0 |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is Radeon IGP 320M (2019 vs 2015).
| Feature | GeForce3 | Radeon IGP 320M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $499 | β |
| Codename | GM108 | Navi 14 |
| Release | March 13 2015 | November 13 2019 |
| Ranking | #810 | #403 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














