GeForce3 vs GeForce4 Ti 4600

NVIDIA

GeForce3

2015Core: 928 MHzBoost: 941 MHz
Similar parts
······
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce4 Ti 4600

2010Core: 675 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce3 vs GeForce4 Ti 4600 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce3 vs GeForce4 Ti 4600 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce3 vs GeForce4 Ti 4600: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce3

2015

Why buy it

  • Draws 33W instead of 160W, a 127W reduction.
  • Measures 165mm instead of 216mm, a 51mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
  • More future proof: Maxwell (2014−2017) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark G3D performance (5 vs 6).
  • Less VRAM, with 65 MB vs 128 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2015 hardware with 65 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 25.1% HIGHER MSRP
    $499 MSRPvs$399 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.0 vs 0.0 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).

GeForce4 Ti 4600

2010

Why buy it

  • +20% higher PassMark G3D performance.
  • Costs $100 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
  • Delivers 50.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.0 vs 0.0 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
  • 98.4% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (128 MB vs 65 MB).

Trade-offs

  • 2010 hardware with 128 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 384.8% higher power demand at 160W vs 33W.
  • 30.9% longer card at 216mm vs 165mm.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce4 Ti 4600 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 20% in PassMark G3D (6 vs 5), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce3 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 28nm process instead of 40nm and a newer 2015 generation instead of 2010. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce4 Ti 4600 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $100 cheaper on MSRP at $399 vs $499, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 50.1% (0.0 vs 0.0), so the value case lines up with the gaming result. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, GeForce4 Ti 4600 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce3 has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce3 vs GeForce4 Ti 4600 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce3

The GeForce3 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 928 MHz to 941 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5 points.

NVIDIA

GeForce4 Ti 4600

The GeForce4 Ti 4600 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 12 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 675 MHz. It has 336 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6 points. Launch price was $229.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce3 scores 5 versus the GeForce4 Ti 4600's 6 — the GeForce4 Ti 4600 leads by 20%. The GeForce3 is built on Maxwell while the GeForce4 Ti 4600 uses Fermi, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce3) vs 336 (GeForce4 Ti 4600). Raw compute: 0.7227 TFLOPS (GeForce3) vs 0.9072 TFLOPS (GeForce4 Ti 4600).

FeatureGeForce3GeForce4 Ti 4600
G3D Mark Score
5
6+20%
Architecture
Maxwell
Fermi
Process Node
28 nm
40 nm
Shading Units
384+14%
336
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.7227 TFLOPS
0.9072 TFLOPS+26%
ROPs
8
32+300%
TMUs
24
56+133%
L1 Cache
192 KB
448 KB+133%
L2 Cache
1 MB+100%
0.5 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce3GeForce4 Ti 4600
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce3 has 65 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce4 Ti 4600 carries 128 MB. GeForce4 Ti 4600 gives you 98.4% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce3 and 64-bit on the GeForce4 Ti 4600. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce3) vs 0.5 MB (GeForce4 Ti 4600) — the GeForce3 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce3GeForce4 Ti 4600
VRAM Capacity
0.063 GB
0.125 GB+98%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
64-bit
L2 Cache
1 MB+100%
0.5 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 8.1 (GeForce3) vs 8.1 (GeForce4 Ti 4600). Vulkan: N/A vs None. OpenGL: 1.3 vs 1.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

FeatureGeForce3GeForce4 Ti 4600
DirectX
8.1
8.1
Vulkan
N/A
None
OpenGL
1.3
1.3
Max Displays
2
2
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: None (GeForce3) vs No (GeForce4 Ti 4600). Decoder: None vs No.

FeatureGeForce3GeForce4 Ti 4600
Encoder
None
No
Decoder
None
No
Codecs
MPEG-1,MPEG-2
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce3 draws 33W versus the GeForce4 Ti 4600's 160W — a 131.6% difference. The GeForce3 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce3) vs 350W (GeForce4 Ti 4600). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 165mm vs 216mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 85 vs 65°C.

FeatureGeForce3GeForce4 Ti 4600
TDP
33W-79%
160W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
165mm
216mm
Height
100mm
111mm
Slots
1
1
Temp (Load)
85
65°C-24%
Perf/Watt
0.2
0.0
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce3 came in at $499, while the GeForce4 Ti 4600 launched at $399. On MSRP, GeForce4 Ti 4600 was 20% cheaper ($100 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.0 (GeForce3) vs 0.0 (GeForce4 Ti 4600) — the GeForce4 Ti 4600 offers 0% better value. The newer card here is GeForce3 (2015 vs 2010).

FeatureGeForce3GeForce4 Ti 4600
MSRP
$499
$399-20%
Performance per Dollar
0.0
0.0
Codename
GM108
GF104
Release
March 13 2015
July 12 2010
Ranking
#810
#652

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.