
GeForce3

GeForce4 Ti 4600
GeForce3 vs GeForce4 Ti 4600 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce3 vs GeForce4 Ti 4600 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce3 vs GeForce4 Ti 4600: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce3
2015Why buy it
- ✅Draws 33W instead of 160W, a 127W reduction.
- ✅Measures 165mm instead of 216mm, a 51mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
- ✅More future proof: Maxwell (2014−2017) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (5 vs 6).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 65 MB vs 128 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2015 hardware with 65 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌25.1% HIGHER MSRP$499 MSRPvs$399 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.0 vs 0.0 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
GeForce4 Ti 4600
2010Why buy it
- ✅+20% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $100 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 50.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.0 vs 0.0 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
- ✅98.4% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (128 MB vs 65 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌2010 hardware with 128 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌384.8% higher power demand at 160W vs 33W.
- ❌30.9% longer card at 216mm vs 165mm.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce3 vs GeForce4 Ti 4600 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce3
The GeForce3 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 928 MHz to 941 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5 points.

GeForce4 Ti 4600
The GeForce4 Ti 4600 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 12 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 675 MHz. It has 336 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6 points. Launch price was $229.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce3 scores 5 versus the GeForce4 Ti 4600's 6 — the GeForce4 Ti 4600 leads by 20%. The GeForce3 is built on Maxwell while the GeForce4 Ti 4600 uses Fermi, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce3) vs 336 (GeForce4 Ti 4600). Raw compute: 0.7227 TFLOPS (GeForce3) vs 0.9072 TFLOPS (GeForce4 Ti 4600).
| Feature | GeForce3 | GeForce4 Ti 4600 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5 | 6+20% |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Fermi |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 384+14% | 336 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.7227 TFLOPS | 0.9072 TFLOPS+26% |
| ROPs | 8 | 32+300% |
| TMUs | 24 | 56+133% |
| L1 Cache | 192 KB | 448 KB+133% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+100% | 0.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce3 | GeForce4 Ti 4600 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce3 has 65 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce4 Ti 4600 carries 128 MB. GeForce4 Ti 4600 gives you 98.4% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce3 and 64-bit on the GeForce4 Ti 4600. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce3) vs 0.5 MB (GeForce4 Ti 4600) — the GeForce3 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce3 | GeForce4 Ti 4600 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.063 GB | 0.125 GB+98% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+100% | 0.5 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 8.1 (GeForce3) vs 8.1 (GeForce4 Ti 4600). Vulkan: N/A vs None. OpenGL: 1.3 vs 1.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce3 | GeForce4 Ti 4600 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Vulkan | N/A | None |
| OpenGL | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (GeForce3) vs No (GeForce4 Ti 4600). Decoder: None vs No.
| Feature | GeForce3 | GeForce4 Ti 4600 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | No |
| Decoder | None | No |
| Codecs | MPEG-1,MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce3 draws 33W versus the GeForce4 Ti 4600's 160W — a 131.6% difference. The GeForce3 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce3) vs 350W (GeForce4 Ti 4600). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 165mm vs 216mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 85 vs 65°C.
| Feature | GeForce3 | GeForce4 Ti 4600 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 33W-79% | 160W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 165mm | 216mm |
| Height | 100mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 1 | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 85 | 65°C-24% |
| Perf/Watt | 0.2 | 0.0 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce3 came in at $499, while the GeForce4 Ti 4600 launched at $399. On MSRP, GeForce4 Ti 4600 was 20% cheaper ($100 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.0 (GeForce3) vs 0.0 (GeForce4 Ti 4600) — the GeForce4 Ti 4600 offers 0% better value. The newer card here is GeForce3 (2015 vs 2010).
| Feature | GeForce3 | GeForce4 Ti 4600 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $499 | $399-20% |
| Performance per Dollar | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Codename | GM108 | GF104 |
| Release | March 13 2015 | July 12 2010 |
| Ranking | #810 | #652 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














