
GeForce3

GeForce4 Ti 4200
GeForce3 vs GeForce4 Ti 4200 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce3 vs GeForce4 Ti 4200 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6

Call of Duty: Warzone
GeForce3 vs GeForce4 Ti 4200: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce3
2015Why buy it
- ✅Draws 33W instead of 450W, a 417W reduction.
- ✅Measures 165mm instead of 175mm, a 10mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (5 vs 6).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 65 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2015 hardware with 65 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌150.8% HIGHER MSRP$499 MSRPvs$199 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.0 vs 0.0 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
GeForce4 Ti 4200
2022Why buy it
- ✅+20% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $300 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 200.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.0 vs 0.0 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
- ✅693.7% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 65 MB).
- ✅Better long-term bet: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌1263.6% higher power demand at 450W vs 33W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce3 vs GeForce4 Ti 4200 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce3
The GeForce3 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 928 MHz to 941 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5 points.

GeForce4 Ti 4200
The GeForce4 Ti 4200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 20 2022. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2235 MHz to 2520 MHz. It has 16384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 450W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 128 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6 points. Launch price was $1,599.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce3 scores 5 versus the GeForce4 Ti 4200's 6 — the GeForce4 Ti 4200 leads by 20%. The GeForce3 is built on Maxwell while the GeForce4 Ti 4200 uses Ada Lovelace, both on 28 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce3) vs 16,384 (GeForce4 Ti 4200). Raw compute: 0.7227 TFLOPS (GeForce3) vs 82.58 TFLOPS (GeForce4 Ti 4200). Boost clocks: 941 MHz vs 2520 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce3 | GeForce4 Ti 4200 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5 | 6+20% |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 16384+4167% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.7227 TFLOPS | 82.58 TFLOPS+11327% |
| Boost Clock | 941 MHz | 2520 MHz+168% |
| ROPs | 8 | 176+2100% |
| TMUs | 24 | 512+2033% |
| L1 Cache | 0.19 MB | 16 MB+8321% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 72 MB+7100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce3 | GeForce4 Ti 4200 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce3 has 65 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce4 Ti 4200 carries 512 MB. GeForce4 Ti 4200 gives you 693.7% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce3 and 64-bit on the GeForce4 Ti 4200. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce3) vs 72 MB (GeForce4 Ti 4200) — the GeForce4 Ti 4200 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce3 | GeForce4 Ti 4200 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.063 GB | 0.5 GB+694% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 72 MB+7100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 8.1 (GeForce3) vs 8.1 (GeForce4 Ti 4200). Vulkan: N/A vs N/A. OpenGL: 1.3 vs 1.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce3 | GeForce4 Ti 4200 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
| OpenGL | 1.3 | 1.5+15% |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (GeForce3) vs None (GeForce4 Ti 4200). Decoder: None vs None. Supported codecs: MPEG-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce3) vs MPEG-2 (GeForce4 Ti 4200).
| Feature | GeForce3 | GeForce4 Ti 4200 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | None |
| Decoder | None | None |
| Codecs | MPEG-1,MPEG-2 | MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce3 draws 33W versus the GeForce4 Ti 4200's 450W — a 172.7% difference. The GeForce3 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce3) vs 350W (GeForce4 Ti 4200). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 165mm vs 175mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 85 vs 65.
| Feature | GeForce3 | GeForce4 Ti 4200 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 33W-93% | 450W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 165mm | 175mm |
| Height | 100mm | 100mm |
| Slots | 1 | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 85 | 65-24% |
| Perf/Watt | 0.2 | 0.0 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce3 came in at $499, while the GeForce4 Ti 4200 launched at $199. On MSRP, GeForce4 Ti 4200 was 60.1% cheaper ($300 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.0 (GeForce3) vs 0.0 (GeForce4 Ti 4200) — the GeForce4 Ti 4200 offers 0% better value. The newer card here is GeForce4 Ti 4200 (2022 vs 2015).
| Feature | GeForce3 | GeForce4 Ti 4200 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $499 | $199-60% |
| Performance per Dollar | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Codename | GM108 | AD102 |
| Release | March 13 2015 | September 20 2022 |
| Ranking | #810 | #4 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














