GeForce3 vs GeForce4 Ti 4800

NVIDIA

GeForce3

2015Core: 928 MHzBoost: 941 MHz
Similar parts
······
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce4 Ti 4800

2010Core: 700 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce3 vs GeForce4 Ti 4800 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce3 vs GeForce4 Ti 4800 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce3 vs GeForce4 Ti 4800: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce3

2015

Why buy it

  • Draws 33W instead of 250W, a 217W reduction.
  • Measures 165mm instead of 216mm, a 51mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
  • More future proof: Maxwell (2014−2017) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark G3D performance (5 vs 6).
  • Less VRAM, with 65 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2015 hardware with 65 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 25.1% HIGHER MSRP
    $499 MSRPvs$399 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.0 vs 0.0 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).

GeForce4 Ti 4800

2010

Why buy it

  • +20% higher PassMark G3D performance.
  • Costs $100 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
  • Delivers 50.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.0 vs 0.0 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
  • 693.7% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 65 MB).

Trade-offs

  • 2010 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 657.6% higher power demand at 250W vs 33W.
  • 30.9% longer card at 216mm vs 165mm.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce4 Ti 4800 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 20% in PassMark G3D (6 vs 5), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce3 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 28nm process instead of 40nm and a newer 2015 generation instead of 2010. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce4 Ti 4800 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $100 cheaper on MSRP at $399 vs $499, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 50.1% (0.0 vs 0.0), so the value case lines up with the gaming result. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, GeForce4 Ti 4800 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce3 has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce3 vs GeForce4 Ti 4800 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce3

The GeForce3 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 928 MHz to 941 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5 points.

NVIDIA

GeForce4 Ti 4800

The GeForce4 Ti 4800 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 26 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6 points. Launch price was $499.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce3 scores 5 versus the GeForce4 Ti 4800's 6 — the GeForce4 Ti 4800 leads by 20%. The GeForce3 is built on Maxwell while the GeForce4 Ti 4800 uses Fermi, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce3) vs 480 (GeForce4 Ti 4800). Raw compute: 0.7227 TFLOPS (GeForce3) vs 1.345 TFLOPS (GeForce4 Ti 4800).

FeatureGeForce3GeForce4 Ti 4800
G3D Mark Score
5
6+20%
Architecture
Maxwell
Fermi
Process Node
28 nm
40 nm
Shading Units
384
480+25%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.7227 TFLOPS
1.345 TFLOPS+86%
ROPs
8
48+500%
TMUs
24
60+150%
L1 Cache
192 KB
960 KB+400%
L2 Cache
1 MB+33%
0.75 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce3GeForce4 Ti 4800
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce3 has 65 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce4 Ti 4800 carries 512 MB. GeForce4 Ti 4800 gives you 693.7% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce3 and 64-bit on the GeForce4 Ti 4800. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce3) vs 0.75 MB (GeForce4 Ti 4800) — the GeForce3 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce3GeForce4 Ti 4800
VRAM Capacity
0.063 GB
0.5 GB+694%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
64-bit
L2 Cache
1 MB+33%
0.75 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 8.1 (GeForce3) vs 8.1 (GeForce4 Ti 4800). Vulkan: N/A vs None. OpenGL: 1.3 vs 1.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

FeatureGeForce3GeForce4 Ti 4800
DirectX
8.1
8.1
Vulkan
N/A
None
OpenGL
1.3
1.3
Max Displays
2
2
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: None (GeForce3) vs No (GeForce4 Ti 4800). Decoder: None vs No.

FeatureGeForce3GeForce4 Ti 4800
Encoder
None
No
Decoder
None
No
Codecs
MPEG-1,MPEG-2
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce3 draws 33W versus the GeForce4 Ti 4800's 250W — a 153.4% difference. The GeForce3 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce3) vs 350W (GeForce4 Ti 4800). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 165mm vs 216mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 85 vs 65°C.

FeatureGeForce3GeForce4 Ti 4800
TDP
33W-87%
250W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
165mm
216mm
Height
100mm
111mm
Slots
1
1
Temp (Load)
85
65°C-24%
Perf/Watt
0.2
0.0
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce3 came in at $499, while the GeForce4 Ti 4800 launched at $399. On MSRP, GeForce4 Ti 4800 was 20% cheaper ($100 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.0 (GeForce3) vs 0.0 (GeForce4 Ti 4800) — the GeForce4 Ti 4800 offers 0% better value. The newer card here is GeForce3 (2015 vs 2010).

FeatureGeForce3GeForce4 Ti 4800
MSRP
$499
$399-20%
Performance per Dollar
0.0
0.0
Codename
GM108
GF100
Release
March 13 2015
March 26 2010
Ranking
#810
#488

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.