GeForce3 Ti 500 vs RADEON 9000

NVIDIA

GeForce3 Ti 500

2025Core: 2017 MHzBoost: 2407 MHz
Similar parts
·····
VS
AMD

RADEON 9000

2024Core: 400 MHzBoost: 2900 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce3 Ti 500 vs RADEON 9000 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce3 Ti 500 vs RADEON 9000 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce3 Ti 500 vs RADEON 9000: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce3 Ti 500

2025

Why buy it

  • 300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 128 MB).
  • More future proof: Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark G3D performance (3 vs 5).
  • 612.2% HIGHER MSRP
    $349 MSRPvs$49 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.0 vs 0.1 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs $49 MSRP).
  • 3733.3% higher power demand at 575W vs 15W.

RADEON 9000

2024

Why buy it

  • +66.7% higher PassMark G3D performance.
  • Costs $300 less on MSRP ($49 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
  • Delivers 1087.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.1 vs 0.0 G3D/$ ($49 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
  • Draws 15W instead of 575W, a 560W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 128 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
RADEON 9000 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 66.7% in PassMark G3D (5 vs 3), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce3 Ti 500 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 512 MB vs 128 MB of VRAM, 170 vs 16 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2025 generation instead of 2024. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
RADEON 9000 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $300 cheaper on MSRP at $49 vs $349, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 1087.1% (0.1 vs 0.0), so the value case lines up with the gaming result. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, RADEON 9000 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce3 Ti 500 has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce3 Ti 500 vs RADEON 9000 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce3 Ti 500

The GeForce3 Ti 500 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 30 2025. It features the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2017 MHz to 2407 MHz. It has 21760 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 575W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 170 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3 points. Launch price was $1,999.

AMD

RADEON 9000

The RADEON 9000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 15 2024. It features the RDNA 3.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 400 MHz to 2900 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5 points.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce3 Ti 500 scores 3 versus the RADEON 9000's 5 — the RADEON 9000 leads by 66.7%. The GeForce3 Ti 500 is built on Blackwell 2.0 while the RADEON 9000 uses RDNA 3.5, both on 5 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 21,760 (GeForce3 Ti 500) vs 1,024 (RADEON 9000). Raw compute: 104.8 TFLOPS (GeForce3 Ti 500) vs 5.939 TFLOPS (RADEON 9000). Boost clocks: 2407 MHz vs 2900 MHz. Ray tracing: 170 RT cores (GeForce3 Ti 500) vs 16 (RADEON 9000) with 680 Tensor cores.

FeatureGeForce3 Ti 500RADEON 9000
G3D Mark Score
3
5+67%
Architecture
Blackwell 2.0
RDNA 3.5
Process Node
5 nm
4 nm
Shading Units
21760+2025%
1024
Compute (TFLOPS)
104.8 TFLOPS+1665%
5.939 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
2407 MHz
2900 MHz+20%
ROPs
176+450%
32
TMUs
680+963%
64
L1 Cache
21.3 MB+8420%
0.25 MB
L2 Cache
96 MB+4700%
2 MB
Ray Tracing Cores
170+963%
16

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce3 Ti 500 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The RADEON 9000 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce3 Ti 500RADEON 9000
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce3 Ti 500 has 512 MB of VRAM, while the RADEON 9000 carries 128 MB. GeForce3 Ti 500 gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce3 Ti 500 and 64-bit on the RADEON 9000. L2 Cache: 96 MB (GeForce3 Ti 500) vs 2 MB (RADEON 9000) — the GeForce3 Ti 500 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce3 Ti 500RADEON 9000
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB+300%
0.125 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
64-bit
L2 Cache
96 MB+4700%
2 MB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce3 Ti 500 draws 575W versus the RADEON 9000's 15W — a 189.8% difference. The RADEON 9000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce3 Ti 500) vs 350W (RADEON 9000). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy.

FeatureGeForce3 Ti 500RADEON 9000
TDP
575W
15W-97%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
Legacy
Length
183mm
Height
0mm
Slots
1
Temp (Load)
80
Perf/Watt
0.0
0.3
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce3 Ti 500 came in at $349, while the RADEON 9000 launched at $49. On MSRP, RADEON 9000 was 86% cheaper ($300 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.0 (GeForce3 Ti 500) vs 0.1 (RADEON 9000) — the RADEON 9000 offers 100+% better value. The newer card here is GeForce3 Ti 500 (2025 vs 2024).

FeatureGeForce3 Ti 500RADEON 9000
MSRP
$349
$49-86%
Performance per Dollar
0.0
0.1
Codename
GB202
Strix Point
Release
January 30 2025
July 15 2024
Ranking
#3
#312

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.