
GeForce PCX 5300 vs RADEON 9000

GeForce PCX 5300
Popular choices:

RADEON 9000
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce PCX 5300 is positioned at rank 376 and the RADEON 9000 is on rank 742, so the GeForce PCX 5300 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce PCX 5300
Performance Per Dollar RADEON 9000
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce PCX 5300 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 20% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the RADEON 9000.
| Insight | GeForce PCX 5300 | RADEON 9000 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+20%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-20%) |
| Longevity | Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026) (5nm) | RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025) (4nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce PCX 5300 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $15 versus $20 for the RADEON 9000, it costs 25% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 60% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce PCX 5300 | RADEON 9000 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+60%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($15) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($20) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce PCX 5300 and RADEON 9000

GeForce PCX 5300
The GeForce PCX 5300 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 30 2025. It features the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2017 MHz to 2407 MHz. It has 21760 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 575W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 170 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6 points. Launch price was $1,999.

RADEON 9000
The RADEON 9000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 15 2024. It features the RDNA 3.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 400 MHz to 2900 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce PCX 5300 scores 6 versus the RADEON 9000's 5 — the GeForce PCX 5300 leads by 20%. The GeForce PCX 5300 is built on Blackwell 2.0 while the RADEON 9000 uses RDNA 3.5, both on 5 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 21,760 (GeForce PCX 5300) vs 1,024 (RADEON 9000). Raw compute: 104.8 TFLOPS (GeForce PCX 5300) vs 5.939 TFLOPS (RADEON 9000). Boost clocks: 2407 MHz vs 2900 MHz. Ray tracing: 170 RT cores (GeForce PCX 5300) vs 16 (RADEON 9000) with 680 Tensor cores.
| Feature | GeForce PCX 5300 | RADEON 9000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6+20% | 5 |
| Architecture | Blackwell 2.0 | RDNA 3.5 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 4 nm |
| Shading Units | 21760+2025% | 1024 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 104.8 TFLOPS+1665% | 5.939 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2407 MHz | 2900 MHz+20% |
| ROPs | 176+450% | 32 |
| TMUs | 680+963% | 64 |
| L1 Cache | 21.3 MB+8420% | 0.25 MB |
| L2 Cache | 96 MB+4700% | 2 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 170+963% | 16 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce PCX 5300 | RADEON 9000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 128 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 96 MB (GeForce PCX 5300) vs 2 MB (RADEON 9000) — the GeForce PCX 5300 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce PCX 5300 | RADEON 9000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.125 GB | 0.125 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 96 MB+4700% | 2 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce PCX 5300 draws 575W versus the RADEON 9000's 15W — a 189.8% difference. The RADEON 9000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce PCX 5300) vs 350W (RADEON 9000). Power connectors: Legacy vs Legacy.
| Feature | GeForce PCX 5300 | RADEON 9000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 575W | 15W-97% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | Legacy |
| Length | 168mm | — |
| Height | 100mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 70 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 0.0 | 0.3 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce PCX 5300 launched at $60 MSRP and currently averages $15, while the RADEON 9000 launched at $49 and now averages $20. The GeForce PCX 5300 costs 25% less ($5 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 0.4 (GeForce PCX 5300) vs 0.3 (RADEON 9000) — the GeForce PCX 5300 offers 33.3% better value. The GeForce PCX 5300 is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2024).
| Feature | GeForce PCX 5300 | RADEON 9000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $60 | $49-18% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $15-25% | $20 |
| Performance per Dollar | 0.4+33% | 0.3 |
| Codename | GB202 | Strix Point |
| Release | January 30 2025 | July 15 2024 |
| Ranking | #3 | #312 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.











